Cases

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31, 2023 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00909-CV DELORES BROWN, Appellant V. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellee On Appeal from the 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2

Order filed January 10, 2022 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-22-00909-CV ____________ DELORES BROWN, Appellant V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND HARRIS COUNTY, Appellees On Appeal from the 164th District Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16-4234 DELORES HENRY, et al., on behalf of a class, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MELODY HULETT, former Warden of Lincoln Correctional Center, et al., Defendants-Appellees. __________

TERENCE T. EVANS, District Judge. Delores Brown was convicted of two counts of felony murder in the Circuit Court of Elkhart County, Indiana. The convictions were affirmed by the Indiana Supreme Court, Brown v. State, 448 N.E.2d 10 (Ind.1983). Brown’s petition for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus was denied by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. She is here appealing the dis

BERTELSMAN, District Judge. This Title VII case requires us to analyze the role of United States magistrates in conducting hearings pursuant to references by district judges, especially in Title VII cases. Particularly in issue is the scope of review by the referring district judge of the findings of fact of a magistrate who has heard the evidence. The d

12 So.3d 478 (2009) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Delores BROWN, Appellant. No. 44,222-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 13, 2009. *479 Lavalle B. Salomon, Monroe, for Appellant. William R. Coenen, Jr., District Attorney, Penny W. Douciere, Kenneth D. Wheeler, Assistant District Attorneys, for Appell

PER CURIAM: * Petitioner-Appellant Delores Brown Redd (“Redd”), federal prisoner # 07861-043, appeals from the district court’s denial of her motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court granted her a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on four issues. For the reasons set out below, we affirm in part and dis*334

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. These cases are before the court on a remand from the United States Supreme Court. The cases arise under the Truth in Lending Act, TILA, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., as implemented by Federal Reserve Board Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq. The plaintiffs were purchasers of motor vehicles under installment payment contracts. The defendants were e

BROWN, Chief Judge, concurring. hi concur in this opinion; however, I would have found that the amount tendered by Coregis, which was less than the stipulated special damages, was grievously inadequate and that penalties should be awarded.

PER CURIAM. See Woods v. Nova Companies Belize Ltd., 739 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. denied, 766 So.2d 222 (Fla.2000); Youngblood v. Citrus Associates of New York Cotton Exchange, Inc., 276 So.2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 285 So.2d 26 (Fla.1973). AFFIRMED. SAWAYA, CJ., SHARP, W., and MONACO, JJ., concur.

FLAUM, Chief Judge. The appellees (“plaintiffs”) filed suit against the appellant (“TTX”) alleging employment discrimination. After contentious litigation, the plaintiffs accepted separate Rule 68 offers of judgment to settle their claims against TTX. The parties, however, were unable to resolve the amount of attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded to plaintiffs’ counsel. The di

BROWN, C.J. ¶ 1. In this case, we must decide whether a volunteer firefighter was entitled to governmental immunity when he ran a red light while responding to an emergency call. Marilyn M. Brown and Delores M. Schwartz were injured in an accident when Parnell E Burditt, a volunteer firefighter for the Okauchee Fire Department (OFD), struck their vehicle while going through a red light on his way to the fire station. Brown and Sc

MEMORANDUM * Michael Brown (“Brown”) appeals the dismissal of his diversity suit alleging various common law tort claims against LabOne, Inc. d/b/a Northwest Toxicology, Quest Diagnostics Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Quest Diagnostics Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Defendants”) for actions related to a positive drug test. Applying Texas law, the district court concluded Brown’s claims were effectively ba

MEMORANDUM * Michael Brown (“Brown”) appeals the dismissal of his diversity suit alleging various common law tort claims against LabOne, Inc. d/b/a Northwest Toxicology, Quest Diagnostics Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Quest Diagnostics Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Defendants”) for actions related to a positive drug test. Applying Texas law, the district court concluded Brown’s claims were effectively ba

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: In re Delores Maxwell Appellate case number: 01-14-00681-CV Trial court case number: 2014-39289 Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County The Court requests a response from Real Party in Interest, Sugarberry Place Phase II Homeowner’s Association, Inc., to the petition

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LYNESHA DELORES ETIENNE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D21-2599 [January 4, 2023] Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County;

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LYNESHA DELORES ETIENNE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D21-2599 [February 8, 2023] Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County;

OPINION OF THE COURT HUNTER, JAMES III, Circuit Judge: The Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union (“PSECU”) appeals a damage award imposed for violations of the bankruptcy code. Appellee Delores Brown is a debtor seeking the protection of the bankruptcy laws; appellant PSECU, her employee credit union, is one of her creditors. PSECU sent a letter to Brown sta

PER CURIAM: Defendants Boisey Beverly, Carl Sykes, Emanuel Brown, and Delores Scott were convicted of various drug trafficking charges, including a conspiracy to possess and distribute drugs. They do not appeal this conviction. In the same trial they were also convicted for using a firearm in relation to those drug trafficking crimes.

Opinion issued August 18, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00681-CV ——————————— IN RE DELORES MAXWELL, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMO