Cases

POLLAK, District Judge. In this case, plaintiff-appellant Delores Armour claims that her First Amendment rights were violated when she was fired from her position as secretary to defendant-appellee Bea Schulte, then a County Commissioner of defendant-appellee Beaver County, Pennsylvania (“the County”). Armour contends that she was terminated because of her political beliefs, and hence that her termination contravened the gen

543 Pa. 216 (1996) 670 A.2d 629 In re PETITION TO CONTEST the GENERAL ELECTION FOR DISTRICT JUSTICE IN JUDICIAL DISTRICT 36-3-03 NUNC PRO TUNC (Two Cases). Appeal of Joseph ZUPSIC. Appeal of Delores A. LAUGHLIN. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 19, 1994. Decided January 22, 1996. *217

FLAHERTY, Judge. Delores A. Laughlin (Laughlin) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County (trial court), dated July 12, 1996, which directed the County Bureau of Elections (Bureau) to certify Joseph Zupsic (Zupsic) for the office of District Justice in Judicial District 36-3-03 (District) pursuant to the Pennsylvania Election Code (Code).1 We affirm. Aft

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Thermoplastics Engineering Co. (TEC), a manufacturer of food processing machinery in Illinois, had trouble raising money for new projects. Ihor Wyslotsky, a mechanical engineer, and Lloyd Shefsky, a tax lawyer, owned TEC; they caused the formation of general partnerships in Israel through which TEC indirectly acquired funds. The principal question in

NARICK, Senior Judge. Big Beaver Falls Area School District (District) appeals the decision of a Pennsylvania Department of Education’s Special Education Appeals Review Panel (Appeals Panel) that ordered compensatory education based on a finding that student Hope Jackson (Hope) had been unlawfully excluded from school by the District for more than fifteen days, during the 1991-92 school year, in violation of 22 Pa.Code § 14.

150 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 268 (1992) 615 A.2d 910 BIG BEAVER FALLS AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. Hope JACKSON, By and Through her mother and next friend, Delores NESMITH, and Delores Nesmith, individually, Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs July 10, 1992. Decided September 1, 1992.

VERGERONT, EJ. ¶ 47. (dissenting). I agree with the majority's analysis and conclusion on City of Beaver Dam's immunity from suit. I write separately because I do not agree with its analysis and conclusion on Dodge County's immunity. In my view there is a conflict between Deputy Steven Moul's deposition testimony, on the one hand, and Debra Krueger's affidavit and the Kruegers' statement to the DNR, on the other, and the conflict

Crete Carrier Corporation appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Delores Kelly Adair. Adair had sued Crete and Terry Lee Hicks, a tractor-trailer driver for Crete. Adair alleged that Hicks had negligently or wantonly operated a truck owned by Crete and had thereby caused it to collide with the motor vehicle Adair was driving. Adair also alleged that Crete had negligently entrusted the truck to Hicks. At the close of Adair's evidence, Crete moved for a judgment as a matt

52 S.W.3d 513 (2001) Melba I. NEIDLINGER, Appellant, v. Jerry Lynn NEIDLINGER, Appellee. No. 1999-SC-0662-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. August 23, 2001. *516 Bonnie M. Brown, Louisville, for appellant. Delores H. Pregliasco, Vicki L. Buba, Louisville, for appellee. *514

Tennessee Health Management, Inc. ("THM"), is a defendant in an action pending in the Madison Circuit Court. It appeals from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of the plaintiffs claims. We reverse and remand. I. Facts and Procedural History Dolores J. Rousseau ("Dolores")1 was admitted to Millennium Nursing and Rehabilitation Center ("Millennium") in Huntsville on January 26, 2008, following hip-r

736 A.2d 612 (1999) Delores EDWARDS, Appellant, v. GERMANTOWN HOSPITAL and Meena v. Phatak, M.D. Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 19, 1999. Filed August 2, 1999. *613 Rudolph J. Di Massa, Philadelphia, for appellant. Lynn F. Reutelhuber, Harrisburg, for Germantown Hospital, appellee. Pau

GORDON, J., This civil action in trespass was instituted by plaintiff against defendants for personal injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident involving a Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority trolley and motor vehicle operated by a City of Philadelphia police officer. On March 6, 1981, plaintiff, Kathleen Williams, boarded a SEPTA route 23 trolley, which was traveling northboun

155 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 219 (1993) 624 A.2d 806 BIG BEAVER FALLS AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. Hope JACKSON, By and Through her mother and next friend Delores NESMITH; and Delores Nesmith, individually, Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 4, 1993. Decided April 23, 1993. *220

436 F.Supp. 1300 (1977) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGHENY AIRLINES and Steward and Stewardess Division of the Air Line Pilots Association, International, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 76-376. United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. September 8, 1977. *1301 Delores Wilson, and Jerome A. Snyder, E

TAMILIA, Judge: Raymond Alexander appeals from the March 28, 1994 Order denying his petition to open and/or strike the $1,680,175.52 judgment entered against him as a 1% partner of defendant Brighton Court Associates (Brighton). Appellant argues this judgment was based upon an unauthorized exercise of authority by Brighton’s managing partner, Daniel Banks (Banks). Appellant (1%), along with Daniel and Jac

[Cite as COD Properties Ohio, L.L.C. v. Black Tie Title, L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-2519.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA COD PROPERTIES OHIO, LLC, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113730 v.

460 S.E.2d 761 (1995) 194 W.Va. 515 Larry B. HOSE and Delores F. Hose, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. The BERKELEY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION; William J. Teach, P.E., County Engineer; Williamsport Storage Bins, Inc., a Maryland Corporation; Todd Snook; and Fox and Associates, Inc., a Maryland Corporation, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 22537. Supreme Court of Appeals of West

321 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2004) In re: BAYCOL PRODUCTS LITIGATION Edwin Ronwin v. Bayer Corp. Chester T. Hennington, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. Kevin Hughes v. Bayer Corp., et al. Luberta Lawson, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. James Richardson v. Bayer Corp., et al. Donald Randall v. Bayer Corp., et al. Mary Bynum, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al. Willard Watts v. Ba

PRESENT: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge, and DIAMOND, District Judge* OPINION OF THE COURT HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge. Appellants, Forest Grove, Inc. (“Forest Grove”), Ronald Isenhart (“Mr. Isenhart”), and Delores A. Isenhart (“Mrs. Isenhart”) (collectively the “Isenharts”), appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern D

33 F.3d 284 RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, As Receiver of Hill Financial, S.A.v.FOREST GROVE, INC.; Ronald Isenhart, a/k/a Ron W. Isenhart;Delores A. Isenhart Forest Grove, Inc., Appellantat No. 93-1944Ronald Isenhart, a/k/a Ron W. Isenhart, Appellant at No. 93-1945Delores A. Isenhart, Appellant at No. 93-1946. Nos. 93-1944, 93-1945 & 93-1946. United States Court of Appe