Cases

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered on or about November 21, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, modified, on the law, to deny defendants’ motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. We agree with plaintiff that Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b), which exempts “hazard vehic

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered on or about November 21, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, modified, on the law, to deny defendants’ motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. We agree with plaintiff that Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b), which exempts “hazard vehic

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Plaintiff Alex Irrizarry Deleon sued defendants New York City, the City Department of Sanitation and Sanitation Depart

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), *931entered November 28, 2007, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied as moot plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability or, in the alternative, to strike defendant’s answer for failure to comply with discovery orders, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*532In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated March 7, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed. The plaint

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered February 11, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff fell onto subway tracks and was hit by a train, granted defendant Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied as ac*228ademic plaintiffs cross motion for disclosure, unanimously affirmed, without costs. <

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Robert W. Damino, Jr., pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of New York, dismissing his complaint alleging race dis*681crimination in violation of Section 198

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Robert W. Damino, Jr., pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of New York, dismissing his complaint alleging race dis*681crimination in violation of Section 198

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered August 3, 1992, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Altman, J., without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant, appearing pro se, challenges numerous rulings by the district court (Sweet, J.) in a case arising from her 1988 removal as chair of the anthropology department of the City College of New York (“CCNY”), a college of the City University of New York (“CUNY”), and the 1989 dismantling of her laboratory. After nine separate opinions were issued and a six-day bench trial was held on Sank’

23-7640 Reyes v. City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2024 No. 23-7640 SEANPAUL REYES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,

Fludd v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 06344) Fludd v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 06344 Decided on November 17, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

Onofre v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 00373) Onofre v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 00373 Decided on January 21, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

Onofre v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 00373) Onofre v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 00373 Decided on January 21, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

15 F.3d 264 63 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1117,63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,819, 62 USLW 2496,9 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. (BNA) 360,22 Media L. Rep. 1246 In the Matter of the Claim of John DOE (this name beingfictitious), Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The CITY OF NEW YORK; The City of New York Commission onHuman Rights; Dennis DeLeon, as Commissioner/Chair of theCity of New York Commission on Human Rights

Nadella v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 03103) Nadella v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 03103 Decided on May 1, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant John Doe, so identified in order to protect his privacy and anonymity, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.) dismissing his civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) 825 F.Supp. 36. Doe brought the action against the defendant-appellees City of New York, the City of New York Commission on H

825 F.Supp. 36 (1993) In the Matter of the Claim of John DOE (this name being fictitious), Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, the City of New York Commission on Human Rights, Dennis Deleon, as Commissioner/Chair of the City of New York Commission on Human Rights and Individually, and Karen Arthur as an employee of the City of New York Commission on Human Rights and Individually, Defendants. No. 92 Civ. 8044 (TPG).

Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth. (2022 NY Slip Op 00252) Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth. 2022 NY Slip Op 00252 Decided on January 13, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Report

Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth. (2022 NY Slip Op 00252) Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth. 2022 NY Slip Op 00252 Decided on January 13, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Report