Cases

OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Roberto Dejesus brings this action against Defendants the City of New *522York (“the City”) and Corrections Officers Michael Patrick McLaughlin, Laron Reese, Richard Tardi, and Edith Margarito, alleging that they deprived him of his constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C

*402Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered June 10, 2005, which granted defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. This action is barred by the doctrine of assumption of risk. The 14-year-old plaintiff, an experienced cyclist, should have realized that certain risks, inc

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Seymour Schwartz, J.) entered May 15, 1992, which dismissed the complaint for failure to make out a prima facie case, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial, without costs. Over a year before the accident involved in this case, defendant the City of New York received notice pursuant to Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-201 (c) of a sidewalk defect a

11 N.Y.3d 889 (2008) INES DEJESUS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided December 18, 2008. *890 Trolman, Glaser & Lichtman, P.C., New York City (Michael T. Altman of counsel), for appellant. Cullen and Dykman LLP, Brooklyn (Joseph Miller

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered October 30, 2006, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion to strike two claims contained in plaintiffs bill of particulars, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and so much of the bill of particulars that alleges that defendant (1) failed to comport with applicable ordinances, codes and statutes, and (2) negligently failed to hire sufficient

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered July 17, 2007, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Shortly after 8:00 a.m. on December 19, 2004, as she returned from leaving a bag of recyclable trash next to a fence surrounding a locked outd

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of New York appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated August 14, 2002, as denied that branch of the motion of the defendant City of New York which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court dated April 8, 2003, as upon, in effect, granting

JED S. RAKOFF, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs are individuals employed by the New York City Department of Sanitation (“DSNY”), who allege that the defendants, the City of New York 3 and John J. Doherty, Commissioner of the DSNY, discriminated against them and others similarly situated on the basis of their race and/or

OPINION OF THE COURT Louis B. York, J. In this summary judgment motion, defendant Evan R. Lazaron (Lazarou) seeks to have plaintiffs’ complaint and all cross claims asserted against him dismissed. For the reasons set forth below, Lazarou’s summary judgment motion is granted. BACKGROUND Danny DeJesus was injured on July 11, 1992 while aiding New York City Transit Author

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered November 3, 1993, which denied defendant New York City Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Issues of fact exist precluding summary judgment, including, on the issue of negligence, whether the conduct of the off-duty Transit Authority police officers amounted to a request that plaintiff assist them in apprehending the driv

OPINION OF THE COURT Althea E. Drysdale, J. The defendant is charged with disorderly conduct (Penal *829Law § 240.20 [5]) and obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (Penal Law § 195.05). The defendant has moved for dismissal of all counts of the accusatory instrument on the ground that it is facially insufficient. The accusato

14 N.Y.3d 860 (2010) 928 N.E.2d 409 902 N.Y.S.2d 27 DIOMARA DeJESUS, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, FRANCISCO DeJESUS, Appellant, v. JOSE J. ALBA et al., Respondents. No. 144 SSM 16. Court of Appeals of New York. Decided May 6, 2010. Seligson, Rothman & Rothman, New York City (Martin S. Ro

Laris v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 01210) Laris v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 01210 Decided on March 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Buenano v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 00479) Buenano v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 00479 Decided on January 30, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Judgment affirmed without costs. Appeal from order entered July 18, 2006 dismissed. At the outset, we note that the appeal from the order entered July 18, 2006 is dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241 [1976]). However, the issues raised the

90 N.Y.2d 643 (1997) 687 N.E.2d 1319 665 N.Y.S.2d 36 Nancy DeJesus, Respondent, v. Wilfred DeJesus, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued September 9, 1997 Decided October 30, 1997. Ochoa & Sebag, Long Island City (Enrique A. Ochoa of counsel), for appellant. Eric Ole Thorsen

WINTER, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the constitutionality of a vehicle checkpoint. Winfred Maxwell, a retired New York City police officer, brought this action against the city of New York and various police officials and officers for alleged violations of his constitutional and civil rights, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3), and 1986, and for corresponding violations of state law. Maxwell’s twenty-eight count amende

102 F.3d 664 65 USLW 2455 Winfred L. MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CITY OF NEW YORK; the New York City Police Department;Timothy Morley, Police Officer; Angel DeJesus, PoliceOfficer; Monserrate Badillo, Police Officer; Davie Arroyo,Police Officer; Daniel Gonin, Police Sergeant; Richard VanLeuvan, Police Sergeant; and George Vasta, PoliceDetective, Defendants,William Bratton, as Pol

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered September 25, 2001, inter alia, declaring that third-party defendants are obligated to defend and indemnify third-party plaintiff Housing Authority in the instant action for personal injuries, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff alleges that he was scalded in a Housing Authority apartment by hot water and steam that suddenly released from a radiator valve. It appears th

Barton v City of New York (2020 NY Slip Op 05880) Barton v City of New York 2020 NY Slip Op 05880 Decided on October 21, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua