⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Deja R Lewis”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-06-03 · Published · cited 91× · 925 F.3d 886
COLE, Chief Judge. After a class of 28,177 exotic dancers alleged that Déjà Vu dance clubs violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage-and-hour laws, Déjà Vu and the class of dancers entered into a settlement agreement. The district court approved the settlement over the objections of four class members who now appeal, arguing that the settlement was fundamentally unfair and fa
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 19a0113p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JANE DOES 1–2, ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellees, │ │
People v. Lewispublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024-08-29 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 IL App (2d) 230045
2024 IL App (2d) 230045 No. 2-23-0045 Opinion filed August 29, 2024 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2025-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 TSPR 117
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2025 TSPR 117 216 DPR ___ Jeffrey Lewis Raizner Abogados de O’Neill & Borges, LLC Número del Caso: AB-2021-0100 Fecha: 13 de noviembre de 2025 Oficina del Procurador General: Hon. Omar Andino Figueroa Procurador General Lcda. Mabel Sotomayor Hernández Subprocuradora General Lcda. Yaizamar
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Pa. Super. 261
J-S31007-25 2025 PA Super 261 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : RASHEED ROBINSON :
In re V.D.public domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-06-03 · Published · cited 1× · 2022 Ohio 1877
[Cite as In re V.D., 2022-Ohio-1877.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : IN RE: V.D. : : Appellate Case No. 29366 : : Trial
Montana Supreme Court · 1986-09-12 · Published · cited 9× · 727 P.2d 504; 223 Mont. 206; 1986 Mont. LEXIS 1027
MR. JUSTICE HARRISON, dissenting. I dissent. In Ingram-Clevenger we were asked to decide whether county commissioners are statutorily mandated to abandon county roads when petitioned by landowners, pursuant to Section 7-14-2601 et seq., MCA. We found the authority discretionary. The commissioners concluded abandonment of 40 feet of the right-of-way of McHugh Lane was not in the best i
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2010-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2010 TSPR 70
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Fernando Moreno Orama y Jorge Farinacci Fernós Demandantes-Recurridos v. José R. De La Torre, Presidente de la Universidad Certificación de Puerto Rico; Universidad de Puerto Rico; José 2010 TSPR 70 Figueroa Sancha, Superintendente de la DPR 178 Policía de Puerto Rico; Ana R. Guadalupe, Rectora Inter
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-03-01 · Published · cited 19× · 320 F.R.D. 116; 97 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 413; 2017 WL 798527; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28872
MEMORANDUM ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant Nauman A. Aly moves for a protective order requiring that his deposition take place in Karachi, Pakistan, the city where he resides, either in person or by videoconference.1 Por the following reasons, the Court grants Aly’s motion to have his deposition taken by videoconference. BACK
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-12-14 · Published · cited 71× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 709; 2012 WL 6605009; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178693
*711 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. Plaintiff Santanu De (“De”) brings this suit against the City of Chicago (“the City”) alleging illegal discrimination on the basis of race in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and illegal discrimination on the bases of national origin and sex in violation of the Illinois Human Right
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2010-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 178 P.R. 969
El Juez Asociado Señor Martínez Torres emitió la opinión del Tribunal. En este recurso se nos solicita exclusivamente que revo-quemos una orden de injunction preliminar que requiere que las autoridades de la universidad pública levanten un receso académico y administrativo en uno de sus recintos. En auxilio de nuestra jurisdicción, paralizamos los efectos de esa orden mientras considerábamos el caso
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2002 TSPR 94
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO San José Realty, S.E., et al. Certiorari Recurrida 2002 TSPR 94 v. 157 DPR ____ El Fénix de Puerto Rico, et al. Peticionarios Número del Caso: CC-1999-480 Fecha: 28/junio/2002 Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones: Circuito Regional V Juez Ponente:
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2023-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Apelación THE 20/22 ACT SOCIETY procedente del INC.; WILLIAM SMITH; Tribunal de Primera LEWIS HUTCHINS, Instancia, Sala ARTHUR PETRIE, ROBERT KLAN202100555 Superior de San DIAMOND Y WILLIAM Juan BRANUM Civil núm.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002-04-08 · Published · cited 8× · 205 F. Supp. 2d 376; 89 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2234; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9417; 2002 WL 1009106
205 F.Supp.2d 376 (2002) SELECT REHAB, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 3:CV01-1278. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. April 8, 2002. *377 *378 Jeffrey Cooper, Mesirov Gelman Jaffe Cramer & Jamieson, Philadelphia, PA, Alexander S. Helderman, Schna
State v. Parkspublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-10-18 · Published · cited 5× · 256 N.E.3d 773; 2024 Ohio 5026
[Cite as State v. Parks, 2024-Ohio-5026.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 30049 : v.
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2012-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 184 P.R. 898
El Juez Asociado Señor Martínez Torres emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Debemos analizar si lo resuelto en Fund. Surfrider y otros v. A.R.Pe., 178 D.P.R. 563 (2010), debe extenderse a los procesos administrativos tramitados al amparo de la Ley Núm. 76-2000 (3 L.P.R.A. sec. 1931 et seq.). Sujeto a lo anterior, debemos auscultar si un grupo de personas tiene legitimación activa para presentar un
In Re Tallmanpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008-11-12 · Published · cited 4× · 397 B.R. 451; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 3743; 2008 WL 4999220
397 B.R. 451 (2008) In the Matter of Gil E. TALLMAN, Debtor. No. 07-12473. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. November 12, 2008. *453 Steven J. Ouellette, Fort Wayne, IN, for Debtor. John L. Horan, Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson & Oldfather, LLP, Lincoln, NE, for Securities America, Inc. <
State v. Mosleypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 5259
[Cite as State v. Mosley, 2025-Ohio-5259.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio/City of Court of Appeals Nos. L-24-1292 Oregon L-25-00013 Appellee Trial Court No. 24 CRB 00370 v. Deja Mosley
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 210 F. Supp. 3d 897; 2016 WL 5462957; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133408
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving ECF Nos. 110 and 118] Pearson, Judge. Plaintiff Tynisa Williams (“Plaintiff’) brought this putative class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendant City of Cleveland (the “City” or “Defendant”) al*899leging compulsory physical delousing and group strip search claims. These claims
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007-05-25 · Published · cited 50× · 226 S.W.3d 332; 35 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2237; 2007 Tenn. LEXIS 504; 2007 WL 1514957
226 S.W.3d 332 (2007) Richard SCHNEIDER et al. v. The CITY OF JACKSON. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. April 3, 2007 Session. May 25, 2007. *334 Charles M. Purcell and Matt S. Shepherd, Jackson, Tennessee, for appellants, Richard Schneider, Tajuana Cheshier, Jamie Page, and The Gannett Satellite Information Network, d/b/a