Cases

05/13/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 5, 2021 Session DEBRA JEAN GRIFFITH-BALL v. STANLEY LAUREN BALL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC-19-CV-0029 Kathryn Wall Olita, Judge ___________________________________

717 F.2d 322 9 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 319, 11 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 123,Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,392 In the Matter of Terry Stephen STARK and Debra Jean STARK, DebtorsTerry Stephen STARK and Debra Jean Stark, Plaintiffs-Appellees,vST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, Conducted by the Sisters of the ThirdOrder of St. Francis, a Not-For-ProfitCorporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 82-3034.

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Stephen Knox's hand was badly injured at his work at Cape Cod Copper (CCC) in October 2016 when he operated a machine that was manufactured by defendant Schechtl Maschinenbau GmbH, a German company. The machine had been sold to CCC by defendant MetalForming, Inc., an American company located in Georgia and Schechtl's U.S. distributor. The qu

O'TOOLE, D.J. The plaintiff, Stephen D. Knox, injured his hand when his foot inadvertently activated a switch on an allegedly defective metal folding machine. The machine was manufactured by the defendant, Schechtl Maschinenbau GmbH, and distributed by co-defendant MetalForming, Inc. Knox and his wife Jean assert claims against both defendants for negligence, breach of warranty, loss of consortium, and violation of Massachusetts General Laws

ACCEPTED 05-14-00544-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:04:41 AM

WALLACE, Judge. In this case we are asked to determine whether the “trust exception” to the requirements of the claims provisions of the Florida Probate Code is applicable to the claim of a former co-tenant based on the joint ownership of two accounts that the decedent reestablished in his sole name without the knowledge or consent of the co-tenant. Because the decedent’s act of reestablishing the accounts in his name alone amou

694 N.W.2d 74 (2005) In re the ESTATE OF Norma Jean BONDE, Decedent. No. A04-784. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. March 29, 2005. Debra J. Klatt, Stephen H. Munstenteiger Law, Anoka, MN, for appellant Allan Bonde. David K. Nightingale, Bernick and Lifson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent Lori Bogren. *75 Considered and

926 S.W.2d 455 (1996) BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ROCKCASTLE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Larry KIRBY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Michael Glen Kirby, Deceased, and Iva Jean Kirby, Appellees. No. 93-SC-870-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. July 25, 1996. Debra Hembree Lambert, Mt. Vernon, John G. Prather, Jr., Somerset, for appellant. Richard Hay, Some

485 F.Supp.2d 247 (2007) Sullivan REALE, Stephen Reale, James Reale, Darlene Feligno, Bette Jean Pitifer, Sandra Massa, Rebekka Acquesta, Debra Buckley, Plaintiffs, v. Anthony P. REALE, Joanne R. Church, The United States of America, Defendants. No. 05-CV-6414L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. April 18, 2007. *248

Bridge, J. — In this negligence action, the City of Spokane (City) seeks reversal of a Court of Appeals decision in favor of Jean Keller, as general guardian for Casey Keller. We hold that the trial court’s instruction to the jury as to the City’s duty to maintain its roadways was misleading and legally erroneous because it allowed the jury to conclude that the City owed Keller no duty if it found that Keller had acted negligent

341 S.C. 234 (2000) 533 S.E.2d 341 Barbara Jean WELLS, Appellant, v. Jeanne L. HALYARD, M.D., Debra B. Lister, M.D., and Healthcare Partners of South Carolina, Respondents. No. 3191. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Submitted May 8, 2000. Decided June 12, 2000. *236 Glenn V. Ohanesian,

¶19 (dissenting) — In my judgment, the trial court’s grant of a summary judgment in favor of the city of Tukwila should be affirmed. I reach that conclusion after reviewing the facts in the record and drawing inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to Jean Owen, the nonmoving party. This review has satisfied me that there is no question of material fact on the issue of whether Tukwila breached its duty to maintain the roadway in question in a mann

33 B.R. 558 (1983) In re Carla Jean CHURA aka Carla J. Chura, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 83 B 2219 G. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. September 6, 1983. Wayne Robinson, Aurora, Colo., for debtor. Jeffrey Edelman, Denver, Colo., for Debra Stephens. MEMORANDUM OPINION JAY L. GUECK, Bankruptcy Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT

Lanzinger, J., dissenting. {¶ 31} I agree that a state court may determine whether a claim is within an arbitration agreement using a federal standard as long as that standard itself is stated correctly and is consistent with Ohio law. Yet because, in my view, the appellate court mischaracterized the federal standard and, by holding that the antitrust claims were not subject to arbitration, minimized Ohio’s pol

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-SEP-2024 02:30 PM Dkt. 32 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-OCT-2024 07:56 AM Dkt. 48 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

Chambers, J. — We are asked to determine whether policy provisions relieve an insurer of the duty of providing coverage. However, because Truck Insurance Exchange breached, in bad faith, its duty to defend, we hold that it is estopped from denying coverage. The insurer further argues that in order to establish damages the insured must prove that its settlements with claimants were reasonable. We hold that where an insurer acts in

Bridge, J. — We are asked to determine whether an insurance company’s claims adjuster who developed a nonadversarial relationship with an unrepresented claimant was practicing law when she completed claims forms, advised the claimants regarding the settlement process, and recommended that the claimants sign a complete settlement and release without advising them that there were potential legal consequences or referring them to i

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. John D. Terzakis was indicted for transporting stolen goods. After the government conceded that its key witness would be unavailable to testify at trial, it moved to dismiss the case. Terzakis then filed a motion under the Hyde Amendment seeking attorney’s fees, which the district court denied. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. Background In the early 1990s

397 F.Supp.2d 1025 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiffs, State of New York, State of New Jersey, State of Connecticut, Hoosier Environmental Council, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. CINERGY CORP., Psi Energy, Inc., and the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Defendants. No. 1:99 CV 1693 LJM VSS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. November