Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00367-COA BRIAN S. POPE APPELLANT v. DEBORAH BAIRD MARTIN A/K/A DEBORAH APPELLEE L. MARTIN A/K/A DEBORAH MARTIN POPE A/K/A DEBORAH L. POPE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/23/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

NO. 12-16-00264-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF THE § APPEAL FROM THE MARRIAGE OF DEBORAH MARTIN § COUNTY COURT AT LAW AND THOMAS SHAFFER § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

Opinion issued March 17, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2084 Doc: 38 Filed: 07/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 12 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2084 In re: DEBORAH FAYE PARKER, Debtor. ------------------------------ DAN G. MARTIN,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-98-00193-CV Patrick H. Martin, Appellant v. Deborah Martin, Appellee

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 Session RONNIE GALE MARTIN v. DEBORAH ELAINE KENT MARTIN Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Tipton County No. 19560 Martha B. Brasfield, Chancellor No. W2008-00015-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 24, 2009 This is the second time these parties have been before this court on ma

CORRECTION MADE June 11, 2024 IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT DEBORAH BOWLIN, ) ) Respondent, ) ) WD86671 v. )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 22, 2004 Session RONNIE GALE MARTIN v. DEBORAH ELAINE KENT MARTIN Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Tipton County No. 19,560 Martha B. Brasfield, Chancellor No. W2003-01968-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 14, 2004 Husband filed present divorce action against Wife alleging irreconcilable

MICHELLE MARTIN V. CHARLES KIRTLAND NO. 07-07-0291-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 21, 2007 ______________________________ MICHELLE MARTIN, APPE

MICHELLE MARTIN V. CHARLES KIRTLAND NO. 07-07-0291-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 21, 2007 ______________________________ MICHELLE MARTIN, APPELLAN

NO. 07-07-0291-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 21, 2007 ______________________________ MICHELLE MARTIN, APPELLANT V. CHARLES

360 F.Supp.2d 533 (2005) Susan MOSES, Plaintiff, v. Deborah MARTIN & Deborah Martin Agency, Inc., Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 1533(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 3, 2004. *534 *535 *536 *537

Affirmed.

DANIEL E. SCOTT, J. Deborah Martin tripped on a crank protruding from a relative’s hospital bed at Mercy Villa, a skilled nursing facility. A jury assessed Mercy 70% of the fault and liability for Ms. Martin’s injuries and denied her husband’s consortium claim. Mercy appeals, raising three points. We affirm. Points I & II We take in reverse order Mercy’s charges that the trial cour

Lisa White Hardwick, Judge Jack Lonsinger (‘Husband1) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for contempt against his former wife, Deborah Walker (‘Wife1), and granting her petition in equity to allocate, as an omitted marital debt, all of the parties’ 2011 tax liability to Husband. For reasons explained herein, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Thomas P. Franczyk, A.J.), entered April 14, 2014. The order, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff seeking leave to renew and reargue his opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and seeking leave to amend the complaint. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Abasciano v Dandrea, 83 A

PER CURIAM. Based on the State’s concession of error, we reverse the revocation of Lawrence Martin’s probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. We remand for the reinstatement of Martin’s probation. REVERSED and REMANDED. COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Thomas P. Franczyk, A.J.), entered April 14, 2014. The order, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff seeking leave to renew and reargue his opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and seeking leave to amend the complaint. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Abasciano v Dandrea, 83 A

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Thomas P. Franczyk, A.J.), entered April 14, 2014. The order, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff seeking leave to renew and reargue his opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and seeking leave to amend the complaint. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Abasciano v Dandrea, 83 A

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Thomas P. Franczyk, A.J.), entered April 14, 2014. The order, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff seeking leave to renew and reargue his opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and seeking leave to amend the complaint. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Abasciano v Dandrea, 83 A