Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Deborah Lynn Peterson”
In the Matter of Deborah Lynn Haklinpublic domain
321 Ga. 530 FINAL COPY S25Y0686. IN THE MATTER OF DEBORAH LYNN HAKLIN. PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of special master Jack J. Helms, Jr., who recommends that respondent Deborah Lynn Haklin (State Bar No. 317385), having defaulted in this matter, be suspended for one year for several violations of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct (“GRPC”) involving her abandonment of a client.1 After neither party requeste
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign
Richardson v. Richardsonpublic domain
| .GUIDRY, J. This action commenced with a notice of proposed relocation sent by Terri Lynn Peterson Richardson, now Blackmar, to her former husband, George Gregory Richardson, informing him of her intent to relocate and establish her legal residence with their children in Naperville, Illinois. The trial court held that Terri Richardson Blackmar could relocate to Naperville, Illinois, with the Richardson’s minor child, Aar
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
15‐0690 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2015 4 (Argued: June 8, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2017*) 5
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-01311-COA MARCUS McFARLAND APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, BY AND THROUGH APPELLEES LYNN FITCH, MISSISSIPPI ATTORNEY GENERAL; NATHAN CAIN, COMMISSIONER OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DEREK MINGO, WARDEN OF MARION COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; AND STEVEN PICKETT, MISSISSIPPI P
Inniss v. Aderholdpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Deborah Aderhold’s (“Ader-hold”), in her official capacity as the State Registrar and Director of Vital Records for the Georgia Department of Public Health, and Monica P. Fenton’s (“Fen-ton”), in her official capacity as Director of System Benefits for the Board of Regents of the University S
State v. Deborah Leigh Goinspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY 1999 SESSION FILED No. M1998-00758-CCA-R3-CD STATE OF TENNESSEE, * No. 01C01-9809-CR-003602000 February 25, Appellee, * Cecil Crowson, Jr.
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
264 F.Supp.2d 46 (2002) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Joseph and Marie Boulos, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey Joseph Boulos, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. 01-2094(RCL), CIV.A. 01-2684(RCL). United
Kimbrel v. Liberty Truck Sales, Inc.public domain
This is the third time this case has come before this Court. SeeKimbrel v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp., 476 So.2d 94 (Ala. 1985) ("Kimbrel I"), and Liberty Truck Sales, Inc. v. Kimbrel,548 So.2d 1379 (Ala. 1989) ("Kimbrel II"). The facts appear at548 So.2d 1379 et seq. Only the following facts are pertinent in this proceeding. Lynn Kimbrel
Edwards v. Bestway Trucking, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by Matthew Edwards, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeremy Matthew Edwards; Donald Ray Wood, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jennifer Dawn Wood; James D. Wood, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Sue Mays; and Jessica Lynn Spradling, from an order entered by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County in a personal injury action.1 The circuit c
Hunt v. American Bank & Trust Co. of Baton Rougepublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellant Hunt, acting as receiver of Life Insurance Company of America (LICA), brought claims under RICO, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 to 1968, Securities Exchange Act § 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), SEC rule 10b-5 and state common law against defendants for allegedly engaging in fraudulent transactions that depleted LICA’s assets. The district court, 606 F.Supp. 1348, dismissed Hunt’s complaint, finding that
Appeal of Stacypublic domain
Lynn, J. The petitioner, David Stacy, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Bar Association Public Protection Fund Committee (PPFC) denying his claim for reimbursement for the fees and costs that he and his conservatorship estate paid to attorney Donald Wyatt. The PPFC found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the funds at issue were lost as a result of Wyatt’s embezzlement, conversion, or theft. We affirm.
307 F.Supp.2d 633 (2004) In re LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 00-CV-621(JAP). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 24, 2004. *634 Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, David J. Bershad, Esq., Jerome M. Congress, Esq., Patrick L. Rocco, Esq., Elaine S. Kusel, Esq., Mary Lynne Calkins, Esq., N
Eklund v. Lundpublic domain
222 N.W.2d 348 (1974) Karon EKLUND, Respondent, v. James LUND and Johann Herzig, Appellants, Deborah Lynn Maxwell Sampson, Respondent, and Deborah Lynn Maxwell SAMPSON, Respondent, v. James LUND and Johann Herzig, Appellants. Nos. 44308, 44309. Supreme Court of Minnesota. October 11, 1974. *349 Rider, Bennett, Ega
In Re the Marriage of Petersonpublic domain
227 N.W.2d 139 (1975) In re the MARRIAGE OF Betty Marie PETERSON and Roger Dean Peterson, Sr. Upon the Petition of Betty Marie PETERSON, Appellant, and concerning Roger Dean PETERSON, Sr., Appellee. No. 2-47115. Supreme Court of Iowa. March 19, 1975. *140 Daniel J. Spellman, Perry, for appellant. Maurer & Jones, Ames, for
Beauchamp v. Ford Motor Companypublic domain
711 N.W.2d 42 (2006) 474 Mich. 1085 Sheila BEAUCHAMP, Garth Beauchamp, Roger Beyer, Karen Beyer, Barbara Biswabic, Kenneth Biswabic, Michael Cahill, Central Super Market, Inc., Nancy L. Chereskin, Jeffrey Church, Lori Cox, John Cox, Gene Davis, Karen Fredrickson, Douglas Fredrickson, Linda Granquist, Janet Gude, Paul Gude, Debra Helgren, Kenneth Helgren, Shari Julian, Allan Julian, Gina Koski, Lori Machus, James Machus, Machus Ren
R.D. Merrill Co. v. Pollution Control Hearings Boardpublic domain
Madsen, J. This case presents several issues arising out of R.D. Merrill Company’s applications for changes in water rights as part of R.D. Merrill’s efforts to provide water for the Wilson Ranch, a cross-country ski resort. R.D. Merrill sought changes in points of diversion, place of use, and purpose of use. Of the five applications now at issue, we affirm the Pollution Control Board’s decision upholding the Department of Ecolog
EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CO. v. Superior Courtpublic domain
74 Cal.Rptr.3d 733 (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 906 EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE COMPANY et al., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Thorpe Insulation Company, Real Party in Interest. No. B200959. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three. April 3, 2008. As Modified April 22, 2008.
Celotex Corp. v. AIU Insurance (In Re Celotex Corp.)public domain
251 B.R. 163 (2000) In the Matter of The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The Celotex Corporation, et al., Plaintiff, v. AIU Insurance Company, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 90-10016-8B1, 90-10017-8B1. Adversary No. 91-40. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 20, 2000. *164