Cases

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. The defendants appeal their convictions and sentences for conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud, and fraudulent sales of misbranded meat. They make numerous claims on appeal, including insufficiency of the evidence, improper jury instructions, erroneous evidentiary rulings, abuse of discretion in providing the jury with a copy of the indictment, and improper

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: In armed robberies committed at check-cashing stores in Northeast Washington, D.C., on May 28 and June 17, 2010, one of the victims was killed and two others were pistol-whipped. Appellants Trotter and Pee, found by a jury to have perpetrated the robberies, appeal their convictions for first-degree felony murder, armed robbery, conspiracy, second-degree

DAMOORGIAN, C.J. Lloyd and Deborah Hunt appeal the circuit court’s final summary judgment in favor of their insurer, State Farm Florida Insurance Company. The Hunts primarily argue that their untimely pre-suit submission of a sworn proof of loss did not preclude them from recovery under the policy. We disagree and affirm. By way of background, in October

Cantil-Sakauye, C.J. *987 This case presents two issues: (1) Is a trial court ruling denying a request for a jury trial in a civil action subject to review prior to trial by a petition for an extraordinary writ or may such a ruling be reviewed only by appeal after trial? and (2) Is there a

DEBORAH J. MILLER, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SD36711 ) Filed: February 18, 2021 GREGORY A. CULTON, SR., ) )

Opinion POLLAK, J. V.S. (Victor)1 appeals the dismissal of his petition seeking to establish that he is the father of one-year-old Donald. Based on undisputed *733facts, it appears that while Victor and M.L. (Mary) were romantically involved, Victor impregnated Mary. About one month before Donald was bom their relationship

[J-18-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, JJ. IN RE: ESTATE OF ISABEL WILNER, : No. 136 MAP 2014 DECEASED : : Appeal from the Order of the Superior APPEAL OF: LINDA BAKER : Court at N

SILER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in most of the conclusions in the majority opinion, but I respectfully dissent from a few of those conclusions for the reasons set out herein. First, I agree with the majority’s conclusion that there is no supervisory liability on the part of the defendants, Luanne Thomas, Darrell Ammon, and Wayne Kessinge

Per Curiam: Plaintiff-Appellant Corsair Special Situations Fund, L.P. ("Corsair") appeals from *590a fee award by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Janet C. Hall, Judge ) in favor of Intervenor-Appellee State Marshal Mark A. Pesiri ("Pesiri"). We assume the parties' familiarity with our earlier opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 956 KA 13-02023 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGORY L. RUSSELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DEBORAH K. JESSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT

LEVAL, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in my colleagues’ opinion certifying our question of Connecticut law to the Connecticut Supreme Court.:'Without doubt, certification has advantages. For a case litigated in the federal court, the parties would have no opportunity without certification to solicit the answer of the state’s highest court.to controlling questions of state law. Certification can also ben

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2084 Doc: 38 Filed: 07/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 12 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2084 In re: DEBORAH FAYE PARKER, Debtor. ------------------------------ DAN G. MARTIN,

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., LAND and WATKINS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February

McDONALD, J. **469 The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sought this court's advice as to whether a Connecticut state marshal is entitled to the statutory fee of 15 percent on the amount of the execution "for the levy of an execution, when the money is actually collected

PER CURIAM. This is an action for termination of parental rights and adoption filed by Deborah Wilkinson (mother) and Todd Wilkinson (stepfather). The trial court entered a judgment which terminated the parental rights of Gregory Thornton (father) to K.L.T. and allowed her adoption by stepfather. Father appeals. We reverse and remand. Father and mother married in 1994, and KL.T. was born of this union in

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: Bernard L. Madoff orchestrated a massive Ponzi scheme through the investment advisory unit of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”). After the scheme collapsed, Irving H. Picard (the “Trustee”) was appointed trustee for BLMIS pursuant to the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq. (“SI

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DEBORAH DUROSS GUIBORD, Appellant, v. GUARDIANSHIP OF KATHLEEN DUROSS FORD, Appellee. No. 4D2023-1070 [July 11, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura John

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY * CAROLYN B. McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Johnny Brett Gregory, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se,1 wishes to appeal the district court’s rejection of his Rule 60(d)(3) motion to set aside its order denying him habeas relief. To do so, he must first obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) from this court. F

371 S.E.2d 82 (1988) Arthur L. and Irma J. SEWELL v. Paul G. GREGORY, Sr. No. 17699. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. July 1, 1988. Dissenting Opinion July 29, 1988. *83 Guy R. Bucci, Charleston, Deborah Henry, Morgantown, Lucien G. Lewin, Martinsburg, for Sewell. Wm. R. McCune, Jr., Clarence Mar