Cases

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 11-3750 _____________ RYAN HART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; DOES 1-50 Ryan Hart, Appellant ______________

YOUNG, J. Claimant appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which affirmed the referee’s denial of compensability. The issue is whether claimant proved by a preponderance of the evidence that her chronic urticaria (hives) is a compensable occupational disease under ORS 656.802(1)(a). We review de novo, ORS 656.298(6), and reverse and remand. Claimant is 35 years old. It appears that

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge The above-captioned case involves claims brought by former flight service specialists against the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Transportation alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by the United States from a judgment of the United States Claims Court that permanently enjoined the United States from awarding a contract to supply automated data processing and related services to the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice. 1 Cl.Ct. 352 (1983). The

502 F.3d 895 (2007) CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS fka McKenzie-Willamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEACEHEALTH, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and PacificSource Health Plans, Defendant, *896 Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon; Providence Health Plan; McKenzie-Willamette Regional Medical Center Associates, LLC, Defendants-Interveno

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER In a separate order filed concurrently with this order, we certified a question on Oregon price discrimination law to the Oregon Supreme Court. Accordingly, the opinion filed on September 4, 2007 is AMENDED as follows. First, the last paragraph before section “I,” originally, 502 F.3d at 901:

ELGO, J. The plaintiffs Anders B. Jepsen and Beth Jepsen appeal from the declaratory judgment rendered by the trial court in this dispute regarding the modification of a beach deed. In this opinion, we address the plaintiffs' claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that the modification in question was properly enacted, (2) concluded that they had not met their burden in establi

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 146 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 147 This is a libel suit brought by a judge and a district attorney against a newspaper and its staff for publishing a satiri

O'Malley, Circuit Judge. *1185 This copyright case returns to us after a second jury trial, this one focusing on the defense of fair use. Oracle America, Inc. ("Oracle") filed suit against Google Inc. ("Google") 1 in the United

MEMORANDUM ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge. This memorandum is written in disposition of three summary judgment motions filed by the defendants in these actions. FACTS Since the 1930s, the twenty-three acre Paoli railyard has been a regional maintenance facility for various rail companies. The railyard was owned and operated by the Pennsylvania Railroad and its successor, the Penn Cent

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS fka  MCKENZIE-WILLAMETTE HOSPITAL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEACEHEALTH, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellee, No. 05-35627 and  D.C. No. PACIFICSOURCE HEALTH PLANS, CV-02-06032-ALH

706 F.Supp. 358 (1988) In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. Mabel BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. BURRELL v. SEPTA, et al. CUMMINS v. SEPTA, et al. COHEN & GARON v. SEPTA, et al. THOMPSON v. SEPTA, et al. JONES v. SEPTA, et al. LAMENT v. SEPTA, et al. Christopher BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Cathlene BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Craig BROWN v. SEPT

ORDER YOCK, Judge. This civilian overtime and premium pay dispute is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed on June 4, 1990. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. Facts All the plaintiffs in this case are guards employed by the United States Department of

765 F.Supp.2d 783 (2011) Ray JASPER, III, Petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. Civil No. SA-08-CA-735-FB. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. January 19, 2011. *790 Jay Robert Brandon, Law Office of Jay Brandon, Rich

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA