Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Deborah Castillo”
Deborah Castillo Ruiz v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-09-00428-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ DEBORAH CASTILLO RUIZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________
Deborah Castillo Ruiz v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-09-00428-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG __________________________
Castillo v. Astruepublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Deborah Castillo appeals from the district court’s summary judgment upholding the denial of her application for disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural background, and we will discuss them only where necessary to explain our ruling. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) reject
Castillo v. Astruepublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Deborah Castillo appeals from the district court’s summary judgment upholding the denial of her application for disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural background, and we will discuss them only where necessary to explain our ruling. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) reject
Castillo v. El Aminpublic domain
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Chief Judge. The appellants, Deborah and Robert Castillo, appeal from an order denying their motion to disqualify the respondents’ counsel, Anthony Gray. Because there is no final, appealable judgment, we dismiss the appeal. The appellants filed a petition for damages against the respondents alleging breach of contract, fraud, and breach of express warranty, arising out of the construc
Castillo v. Ricepublic domain
(2008) Enrique CASTILLO, Eridania Del Carmen Paez, Andres Gomez and Danny Pichardo, Petitioners, v. Condoleeza RICE, Secretary of State of the United States; Maura Harty, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Consular Affairs; June Kunzman, Managing Director, Visa Office, U.S. Department of State; Jeffrey Gorsky, Chief of Legislation and Regulatory Assistance, U.S. Department of State; John Brennan, Director of Field Support and Liaison, U.S. Department
Castillo v. Turnbullpublic domain
HOLLAR, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (July 29, 2005) Before the Court are applications for writs of habeas corpus, filed by the Petitioners, pursuant to 5 V.I. CODE Ann. § 1301 et seq. The Respondent(s) filed an opposition on June 16, 2005. The Petitioners individually challenge their current detention, at the Bureau of Corrections, pending criminal prosecutions in Criminal C
Castillo v. Exclusive Builders, Incpublic domain
733 N.W.2d 62 (2007) 273 Mich. App. 489 Kelly S. CASTILLO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evaristo Ledesma Castillo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXCLUSIVE BUILDERS, INC., Comfort Temp Heating & Cooling, Inc., Universal Wall Systems, Inc., are Properties, L.L.C., Lake St. Clair Plastics Corporation, Two Shot Manufacturing, Mark R. Gilewski, Les Gilewski, and LSCP Investments, Inc., Defendants,
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Castillopublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 15, 2008) The people of the Virgin Islands (the “government”) appeal from an order of Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John (the “Superior Court”),1 denying the government’s motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of the criminal charges against Deborah Lee Castillo (“Castillo”). I. FACTS
Ray Castillo, and Deborah Arlene Castillo v. American Laundry MacHinery Inc. Cooper Industries, Inc.public domain
74 F.3d 1248 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ra
Latham v. Castillopublic domain
972 S.W.2d 66 (1998) B. Mills LATHAM, Law Offices of B. Mills Latham, P.C., and Latham and Moss, Petitioners, v. Ernest M. CASTILLO and Audona A. Castillo, individually and as representatives of the Estate of Kay Castillo, deceased, Respondents. No. 96-0986. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued April 23, 1997. Decided June 23, 1998. Rehearing Overrul
Castillo v. Bernepublic domain
Castillo v Berne (2024 NY Slip Op 04191) Castillo v Berne 2024 NY Slip Op 04191 Decided on August 14, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Castillo v. Lathampublic domain
973 S.W.2d 312 (1996) Ernest M. CASTILLO, et al., Appellants, v. B. Mills LATHAM, et al., Appellees. No. 13-94-316-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 6, 1996. Rehearing Overruled August 29, 1996. *315 John Gano, Gano & Donovan, P.C., Houston, for appellants. Gaston M. Broyles, Jr., Bro
Lance Ross v. Hon. Deborah Prattepublic domain
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO LANCE ROSS, Petitioner, v. DEBORAH PRATTE, JUDGE PRO TEMPORE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, Respondent, and
El Juez Asociado Señor Feliberti Cintrón emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Hoy examinamos si ciertas expresiones verbales atri-buidas al comisionado de seguros son suficientes para de-jar sin efecto las tarifas aplicables a los seguros de propie-dad para condominios, según aprobadas previamente por la Oficina del Comisionado de Seguros (OCS). Igualmente analizamos si, bajo los contornos de la doctrina de actos pr
Bowen, Deborahpublic domain
PD-0798-15 PD-0798-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 6/29/2015 12:18:17 PM Accepted 6/29/2015 5:12:56 PM
Castillo v. Statepublic domain
178 Ga. App. 312 (1986) 342 S.E.2d 782 CASTILLO v. THE STATE. 71735. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 18, 1986. Ronald G. Shedd, for appellant. Stephen F. Lanier, District Attorney, Fred R. Simpson, Danny W. Crabbe, Deborah D. Haygood, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. CARLEY, Judge. Appe
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Castillopublic domain
Bank of Am., N.A. v Castillo (2024 NY Slip Op 02513) Bank of Am., N.A. v Castillo 2024 NY Slip Op 02513 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Castillo v. Frankspublic domain
690 P.2d 425 (1984) Manuel CASTILLO, Jr., and Deborah Castillo, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Jake FRANKS and Myrle M. Franks, Defendants and Appellants. No. 84-193. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs August 30, 1984. Decided November 1, 1984. *426 Huppert & Swindlehurst, Livingston, for defendant
Castillo v. Kunnemannpublic domain
MR. JUSTICE MORRISON delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellants, Manuel and Deborah Castillo and Garry and Sharyl Cotant, appeal from an order of the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, entered on October 8,1980. The order denied appellants’ request for an injunction preventing respondent, Delbert Kunnemann from diverting certain water. On September 29, 1981, this Court issued an opinion reversing t