Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. Counsel for plaintiff Deborah MacFarlan (“MacFarlan”) has employed the common, though conceptually flawed (see NAACP v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 978 F.2d 287, 291-93 (7th Cir.1992)), practice of dividing her Amended Complaint (“AC”) into a number of counts that assert different theories of recovery (causes of action

McCULLOUGH, Judge. *609Leigh Bowman Malinak ("plaintiff") appeals from a contempt order holding Pavol Malinak ("defendant") in willful civil contempt and *610holding defendant owes $6,800.00 in back child support. For the following reasons, we reverse and

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Gregory M. Willis and the briefs before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award. * * * * * * * * * * * The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were enter

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-00804-COA SAMUEL WEATHERLY APPELLANT v. BRANDY WEATHERLY APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/12/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CARTER O. BISE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,

CULPEPPER, Judge. This is an appeal by defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, from a judgment ordering it to pay $12,000 under its uninsured motorist coverage of plaintiff, Earl Bryant. Allstate argues that Gulf States Utilities, the employer of the tort-feasor, is able to pay the amount of the liability of the tort-feasor which his insurance does not cover, so the tort-feasor is not underinsured. Plaintif

HUMPHREYS, Judge. Richard C. Wagoner, Jr. (“Wagoner”) was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court of the City of Martinsville (“trial court”) of abuse or neglect of an incapacitated adult resulting in death, in violation of Code § 18.2-369(B). On appeal, *233Wagoner argues (1) that the trial court applied the wrong decis

REINHARD, Judge. Defendant appeals after being convicted by a jury of one count of stealing an automobile, five counts of first degree robbery, four counts of armed criminal action, and one count of first degree burglary. He was sentenced to a total term of sixty years’ imprisonment.1 We affirm. We briefly set forth the pertinent facts, gleaned from consideration of the eviden

98 P.3d 827 (2004) Joseph J. KIRBY and Deborah A. Kirby, husband and wife, Appellants, v. The CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal corporation; Ray Corpuz and "Jane Doe" Corpuz, husband and wife; Philip Arreola and "Jane Doe" Arreola, husband and wife; William Woodard and Catherine Woodard, husband and wife; Raymond Roberts and "Jane Doe" Roberts, husband and wife; David Brame and "Jane Doe" Brame, husband and wife; James Hairston and "Jane Doe" Hairston,

459 S.E.2d 246 (1995) 341 N.C. 104 STATE of North Carolina v. Eric JOHNSON. No. 266A94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 28, 1995. *247 Michael F. Easley, Atty. Gen. by Marilyn R. Mudge, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. J. Henry Banks, Henderson, for defendant-appellant. PARKER, Justice.

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. The Harrison County Chancery Court granted George William Rhodes Jr. (“Rocky”) and Stacey Anne Rhodes an irreconcilable-differences divorce. This case presents several questions regarding the chancellor’s classification and distribution of their assets. Stacey argues that the chancellor erred in rejecting her argument that several businesses and real-estate properties were mar

852 So.2d 450 (2003) STATE of Louisiana v. Dale Michael SCHEXNAIDER. No. 03-144. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. June 4, 2003. *452 Paula Corley Marx, Louisiana Appellate Project, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant Appellant, Dale Michael Schexnaider. James C. Downs, D.A., James M. Buck, A.D.A., Alexandria, LA, for

83 F.Supp.2d 125 (1999) In re TOBACCO/GOVERNMENTAL HEALTH CARE COSTS LITIGATION. The Republic of Guatemala, Plaintiff, v. The Tobacco Institute, Inc., et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1279. Misc. No. 99-213. Civil Action No. 98-1185 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 30, 1999. *126 George M. Flemin

OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. The Republic of Guatemala has brought suit in this Court against nine individual tobacco companies and the tobacco industry’s public relations and research organizations. Guatemala claims that it failed to regulate the use of tobacco products by its citizens adequately because of the tobacco industry’s continued misrepresentations and anticompetitive be

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. States that sued tobacco companies have been promised more than $200 billion in settlement over a 25-year period. Awed by this success, health insurers (including ERISA welfare benefit funds) have filed me-too suits, contending that the tobacco producers must compensate the insurers for the costs of smokers’ health care. Defendants have been unwilling to settle these suits, however, and insurers h

743 F.Supp. 783 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS, SOUTHWESTERN FERTILITY CENTER, Respondent. No. CIV 90-105-R. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. May 15, 1990. *784 Mary M. Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oklahoma City, Okl., Michael F. Hertz, Ronald H. Clark, Mark D. Polston, Commercial Lit

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PETITION FOR SUMMARY ENFORCEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge. Before the Court is a motion filed February 20, 1990 to dismiss the petition for summary enforcement of an administrative subpoena by respondent, Custodian of Records of the Southwestern Fertility Center (“SFC”). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). Petitioner, the Inspector General fo

196 F.Supp. 71 (1961) Warren H. WHEELER, a Minor, by J. H. Wheeler, his father and next friend, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DURHAM CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION a body politic in Durham County, North Carolina, Defendant. C. C. SPAULDING, III, a Minor, by C. C. Spaulding, Jr., his father and next friend, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DURHAM CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body politic in Durham County, North Carolina, Defendant. Nos. C-

673 F.Supp. 1278 (1987) PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, Shell Oil Company, Northern Petrochemical Co., El Paso Products Company and Himont U.S.A., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Hercules Incorporated and Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 83-143, 83-148, 83-547, 83-801, 84-79 and 85-255 LON. United States District Court, D. Delaware. October

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. This case arose in the aftermath of the settlement of Darla S. Guard, et' ál. v. American Home Products, Inc. (Guard).1 The Guard case, which is also known as “Jonetta Moore, et al. v. American Home Products, Inc.,” or the “Moore ” case, was brought by Kentucky residents who had taken th