Cases

Davis, Justice: The petitioner herein and defendant/third-party plaintiff below, David Earl Bowyer (“Mr, Bowyer”), appeals from an order entered October 18, 2016, by the Circuit Court of Doddridge County. By that order, the circuit court denied Mr. Bowyer’s motion to amend his third-party complaint and granted partial summary judgment to the respondent herein and plaintiff/third

By Judge G. Carter Greer Following a four day trial, a jury convicted the Defendant of the felonious abuse and neglect of Joseph Steven Tuggle, an incapacitated adult, which abuse and neglect resulted in Tuggle’s death, in violation of Va. Code § 18.2-369(B), as amended. “Any responsible person who abuses or neglects an incapacitated adult in violation of this section and the abuse or neglect results in the death of the inca

415 F.3d 391 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.H. Wayne POSEY, et al., Defendants,H. Wayne Posey, Charles W. McQueary, Robert D. Smith, Deborah A. Johnson, Dale K. Edwards, Robert M. Sontheimer, Gregory A. Wagoner, M.D., Thomas E. Chaney, M.D., James F. Herd, M.D., Sanjeev K. Mehra, Richard E. Ragsdale, Defendants-Appellees.Charles J. Buysse, M.D., Jack W. McCaslin, Defendants-Third

HUMPHREYS, Judge. Richard C. Wagoner, Jr. (“Wagoner”) was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court of the City of Martinsville (“trial court”) of abuse or neglect of an incapacitated adult resulting in death, in violation of Code § 18.2-369(B). On appeal, *233Wagoner argues (1) that the trial court applied the wrong decis

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2013 Term FILED November 13, 2013 _____________ released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS No. 12-1135

Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence AFFIRMS in part and MODIFIES in part the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner as follows: The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following which were agreed upon by the parties as ST

THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 83 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2025 July 24, 2025 BARBIE JEAN SCHWINN and DEBORAH SCHWINN BAILEY, Appellants (Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants), v. S-24-0255 ROBERT L

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 10, 2008 Session DONNIE VAUGHT, ET AL. v. ALAN JAKES, SR. and wife DEBORAH JAKES, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 04-9382 CV Donald P. Harris, Judge No. M2007-01858-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 29, 2009 A group of Rutherford County l

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 10, 2008 Session DONNIE VAUGHT, ET AL. v. ALAN JAKES, SR. and wife DEBORAH JAKES, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 04-9382 CV Donald P. Harris, Judge No. M2007-01858-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 26, 2009 A group of Rutherford County landow

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY 1999 SESSION FILED No. M1998-00758-CCA-R3-CD STATE OF TENNESSEE, * No. 01C01-9809-CR-003602000 February 25, Appellee, * Cecil Crowson, Jr.

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 6 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2023 January 16, 2024 TONY R. TESTOLIN and TIM KARLBERG, Appellants (Defendants), v. S-23-0132 THIRTY-ONE BAR RANCH COMPANY, a Wyoming corporation, Appe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge: These consolidated bankruptcy appeals arise out of the third attempt by A&G *513Goldman Partnership and Pamela Goldman (the “Appellants” or “Goldman Parties”) to side step a permanent injunction entered by the bankruptcy court in 2011 in connection -with its approval o

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:' General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”) appeals the dismissal of its negligent misrepresentation claim against several former directors and officers of Promedco Management Company (“Pro-medco”). Because GECC’s complaint pleads sufficient allegations to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, we reverse and remand.

328 F.3d 1346 Derrick A. WILEY, Petitioner,v.DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent. No. 02-3044. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: May 12, 2003. Ari H. Mendelson, Law Office of Martin J. Rivas, P.A., of Coral Gables, Florida, argued for petitioner. On the brief was Martin J. Rivas.

14 F.3d 597NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Mark LEWIS, a/k/a Chubb, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5240. United States C

Misa v Town of Brookhaven (2023 NY Slip Op 00316) Misa v Town of Brookhaven 2023 NY Slip Op 00316 Decided on January 25, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION HAMILTON, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises numerous issues arising from a dispute between competing cable television operators in the City of Charlottes-ville, and Albemarle County, Virginia, whereby one of the cable operators disconnected the service of the

Affirmed in part and vacated in part by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. . This appeal represents the latest in a series to come before the court stemming from a dispute over cable franchise rights in Char-lottesville, Virginia. In this appeal, defendant/appellant, Charlottesvill

Affirmed as modified by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION HAMILTON, Circuit Judge: This appeal challenges the propriety of a preliminary injunction which prohibits the Appellants — a cable television provider and four residential apartment complexes — from operating under cable provider agreements to the exclu

PER CURIAM. hln accordance with section 2(D)(3) of amendment 80 to the Arkansas Constitution and Rule 6-8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of the State of Arkansas, the Honorable Susan 0. Hickey, of the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Hot Springs Division, filed a certification order with our clerk