Cases

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 10, 2014. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00586-CR EX PARTE RICKY DEAN FOWLER, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-0069295 MEMORANDUM

April 10, 2014 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals EX PARTE RICKY DEAN FOWLER NO. 14-13-00586-CR ________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIR

Opinion issued July 12, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00215-CR ——————————— IN RE RICKY DEAN FOWLER, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 27, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00712-CR IN RE RICKY DEAN FOWLER, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Court at Law No. 1 Galveston County, Texas

&0fr-C^_ ylA /-/?-/£ 14th COURT HOUSTONOFAPPPAic TFVAS LS CHRISTOPHER Z^L I CLERK Afifofc/'/?/Md#//W/&e &//&/ATJMH!d/**U£, 4

Peters, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mugglin, J.), entered June 26, 1996 in Delaware County, which, inter alia, denied a motion by defendant Agway Petroleum Corporation to dismiss the complaint against it for failure to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendant Dean Fowler Oil Company, Inc. (hereinafter DFO) based upon a customer equipment lease, execut

5 S.W.3d 10 (1999) 339 Ark. 207 Gerald Dean FOWLER v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 99-802. Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 18, 1999. *11 Brenton D. Bryant, Fayetteville, for appellant. Winston Bryant, Att'y Gen., by: Gil Dudley, Asst. Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. ANNABELLE CLINTON

Wendell L. Griffin, Judge. Gerald D. Fowler appeals his conviction of harassment in Washington County Circuit Court on May 14, 1998. Appellant argues that the trial court erred when it permitted the State to inquire during cross-examination into his and a witness’s political beliefs and attendance at a meeting. We agree and reverse. On October 9, 1997, the victim and her tw

390 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2005) Vivian BURKE-FOWLER, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, Defendant. No. 604CV25JADAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. June 30, 2005. *1209 John Vernon Head, Howey-in-the-Hills, FL, for Plaintiff. Kevin W. Shaughnessy, Jeanie M. Demshar, Akerman Senterfitt, Douglas T

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 739 OPINION Betty Joann Erickson (Betty) was, by all accounts, a friendly, deeply religious, and stubborn woman. Some time after her husband's death in 2002, Betty's mental capacities began to diminish with the onset of senility, though she still valued her independence. She still maintained an

OPINION The trial court found that, though Nadine Capps' will was gone, her determination had remained that her property be distributed as directed by her will. The court therefore admitted it to probate as a valid holographic will and appointed Devon Roberts as administrator of Capps' estate. Urging eleven points of error, Truman Bishop, as temporary administrator1 of Capps' estate, and Hulene B. Parvar, in he

430 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2006) Mark TELLO, et al, Plaintiffs, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., et. al., Defendants. No. 8:02-CV-2115-T-23SDM. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. January 25, 2006. *1263 Michael G. McLellan, Finkelstein, Thompson, and Loughran, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Eric F. Leon, J

EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, concurs in the result. APPENDIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Mark TELLO, et al., Plaintiffs, *976v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., et a!., Defendants. CASE NO: 8:02-cv-2115-T-23SDM. Jan. 25, 2006.

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This interlocutory appeal presents the issue of whether the amended statute of limitations in the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1658(b), revives securities fraud actions that were time-barred before the effective date of the SOA. Determining that the new limitations period revives actions that previously were

15 P.3d 502 (2000) 2000 OK 96 Eddie FOWLER and Karen Fowler, individually and as husband and wife, Dennis Hawkins and Arlene Hawkins, individually and as husband and wife, Lee Smith and Marjorie Smith, individually and as husband and wife, and Orah Fowler, individually, Appellees, v. LINCOLN COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT, Appellant. No. 89,115. Supreme Court of Oklahoma.<

226 S.E.2d 867 (1976) 30 N.C. App. 393 Russell Dean FOWLER v. Paul McLEAN. No. 7519SC1078. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 4, 1976. *869 Ottway Burton by Millicent Gibson, Asheboro, for plaintiff. Henson, Donahue & Elrod by Daniel W. Donahue, Greensboro, for defendant. BROCK, C

[Cite as State v. Dean, 2025-Ohio-342.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2024-P-0023 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas RANDY K. DEAN,

In re Douglas Dean, applying for writ of review from the Fourth Circuit, Court of Appeals. St. Bernard Parish. 416 So.2d 334. Denied.

922 F.Supp. 8 (1996) METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., Plaintiff, v. Judy Ann FOWLER, Individually, and as Conservator For the Estates of Florisa M. Fowler and Julie A. Fowler, Minors, and Timothy Fowler and Cindy McGoldrick, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-CV-40087-FL. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division — Flint. April 15, 1996.

— In action No. 2, by an insurer to recover, as the subrogee of its insureds Dean and Charlotte Fowler, amounts it has paid or may be required to pay to them, as a result of the negligence of the defendants, the plaintiff Arnica Mutual Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (De Luca, J.), entered August 1, 1984, as granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Pebble Hill B