Cases

Opinion and Order Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the motion of the plaintiff, Choice Hotels International, Inc., for summary judgment (ECF No. 58). The Court held a hearing on the motion on August 18, 2015, and has considered the parties’ briefing in support and opposition. For the reasons set forth herein the Court grants the motion for su

[Cite as Corder v. Ohio Edison, Co., 2019-Ohio-2639.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HARRISON COUNTY CRAIG D. CORDER ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OHIO EDISON COMPANY, Defendant-App

JUDGES: Hon. Carol Ann Robb, Hon. Cheryl L. Waite, Hon. Mary DeGenaro OPINION ROBB, P.J. {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Caldwell Hotel, LLC appeals the decision of the Noble County Common Pleas Court entered upon the motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff-Appellee Wayne W. Watson, the holder of a non-exclusive easement over a portion of adjoining land owned by the hotel. In ruling on the req

McFarland, J. {¶ 1} Eric Martindale commenced an appeal of the January 4, 2017 judgment of the Athens County Court of Common Pleas, subsequent to a Domestic Violence Civil Protection Order Full Hearing. Appellant contends the trial court erred in granting the full protection order and in naming the children as protected parties. Upon review, we find the trial court's decision is support

*1146Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered March 4, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of third-party defendant Tramz Hotels, Inc., doing business as Holiday Inn, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint of USA Clean, improperly sued as USA Clean, formerly known as Frontier

DONOVAN, J. {¶ 1} This matter is before the Court on the April 13, 2017 Notice of Appeal filed by Satya Hospitality Corporation ("Satya"). Satya operates the Red Carpet Inn (the "Inn") at 15 Rockridge Road in Englewood, and it appeals from the trial court's March 29, 2017 "Decision, Order and Entry Affirming in part and Vacating in part the Decision of the City of Englewood, Ohio Property Maintenance Hearing Board [ ('the Board') ].

[Cite as Danopulos v. Am. Trading II, L.L.C., 2016-Ohio-5014.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO IRENE DANOPULOS, : APPEAL NO. C-150585 TRIAL NO. A-1406301 Plaintiff-Appellant, : vs. : O P I N I O N. AMERI

GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE This action arises out of Plaintiff Tracy Parker's claims of sex and disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII"), the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101,

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

Miller, Judge. {¶ 1} We affirm the trial court's reluctant determination that the residential zoning designation placed on riverfront land near downtown Cincinnati, presently and historically used for industrial purposes, is constitutional. The city is empowered to zone property in an effort to change the character of a neighborhood. Appellants did not meet their high burden of establis

[Cite as Moyer v. Abbey Credit Union, Inc., 2020-Ohio-5410.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY JUDA MOYER : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 28759 : v.

[Cite as Jai Shree Ganesh, L.L.C. v. Athens Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2025-Ohio-4692.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ATHENS COUNTY JAI SHREE GANESH LLC, : (et al.), : Appellant(s)-Appellant, Case

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Cline ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court granted judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant-appellee, Yellow Transportation, Inc. ("appellee"). *Page 2 {¶ 2} Appellant is an over-the-road truck driver employed by appellee. Early on the

THOMAS M. ROSE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Allstate Insurance Company has moved the Court for entry of summary judgment on Plaintiff American Land Investments, Ltd.'s claims of breach of contract and lack of good faith under Ohio common law. (ECF 37) Because the motion is well-taken, it will be granted. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff American Land Investmen

130 Nev., Advance Opinion 1-46 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FCH1, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED No. 59630 LIABILITY COMPANY, F/K/A FIESTA PALMS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY D/B/A THE FILED PALMS CASINO RESORT,

SADLER, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Timothy ("Timothy") and Meredith ("Meredith") Grieser (collectively "appellants"), husband and wife, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendants-appellees, Leonard R. Janis, D.P.M., and Total Foot and Ankle of Ohio, Inc. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. I. FACTS

Re: Dkt. No. 111 OPINION REGARDING MOTION OF TRUMP AC CASINO MARKS, LLC FOR AN ORDER MODIFYING THE AUTOMATIC STAY PURSUANT TO 11 US.C. § 362(d) TO ALLOW TERMINATION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE DEBTORS KEVIN GROSS, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The Court is deciding the motion of Trump AC Casino Marks, LLC (“Trump AC”) which seeks relief from the automatic stay pursuant to S

130 Nev., Advance Opinion Askr, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FCH1, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED No. 59630 LIABILITY COMPANY, F/K/A FIESTA PALMS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY D/B/A THE FILED PALMS CASINO RESORT, Appellant,

Office of the Director New Mexico 11:32:18 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-009 Filing Date: February 15, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38396 MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, Governor of New Mexico; KATHYLEEN KUNKEL, Secretary of the

(C) making the record was a regular practice of that activity; (D) all these conditions are shown by the testimony of the custodian or another qualified witness, or by a certification that complies with Rule 902(11) or (12) or with a statute permitting certification; and (E) the opponent does not show that the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation in