Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dawn Michelle Casey”
Casey Piatt v. Police and Firemen's Retirementpublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-5504-12T1 CASEY PIATT, BRUCE DAVIS, TAMMY DAVIS, MICHAEL CORTES, JOHN R. FALZONE, MADELINE McKENZIE, TERRY BOWEN, FRED SIENA, BRUCE VANMETER, KEVIN CARTER, MARK APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION MEZIS, STEV
Casey v. Frankpublic domain
346 F.Supp.2d 1000 (2004) Kevin CASEY, Petitioner, v. Matthew FRANK, Respondent. No. 00-C-1095. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. November 24, 2004. *1002 Kevin Casey, Pro se, for Plaintiff or Petitioner. William Ganser, for Defendant or Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER ADELMAN, Dis
Mendoza v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Shelton v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 691 F.3d 1348 (11th Cir.2012); State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). PALMER, COHEN, and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
Casey v. Lewispublic domain
834 F.Supp. 1477 (1993) Fletcher CASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV 90-0054 PHX CAM, CIV 91-1808 PHX CAM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 19, 1993. *1478 *1479 Alice Loeb Bendheim, Phoenix, AZ, Adjoa A. Aiyetoro, Stuart Henry Adams, Jr.,
Murray v. Superpublic domain
Blake, J. The mother, Dawn Michelle Murray, appeals from a judgment of the Probate and Family Court dismissing her complaint for modification, which sought to remove the minor children of the marriage to the State of California. Where the parent seeking to move has primary physical custody of the children, the standard governing removal of the minor children from the Commonwealth re
Christensen v. Quinnpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge. Pending are motions for summary judgment by all defendants. Plaintiff, Daniel Reed Christensen, opposes each motion, and separately moves for summary judgment against defendants Humane Society of the United States, Wayne Pacelle, Scottlund Haisley, Dr. Dawn Dale, Dr. Adam Bauknecht, United Animal Nations, Ti
Cotton v. PrivateBank and Trust Co.public domain
235 F.Supp.2d 809 (2002) Sherman COTTON, as Independent Executor of the Estate of Loy E. King, Jr. and Trustee of the Loy E. King, Jr. Living Trust, as Amended, Plaintiff, v. PRIVATEBANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, No. 01 C 1099. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 13, 2002. *8
Kays v. Commonwealthpublic domain
OPINION NICKELL, JUDGE: Casey Kays stands convicted of one count of rape1 and one count of sodomy,2 both in the third degree. Conviction followed an October 2014 trial where jurors chose the maximum sentence of five years on each charge, terms to be served consecutively for a total of ten years. The Jefferson Circuit Court sentenced Kays in conform
Fohey v. Knickerbockerpublic domain
130 S.W.3d 730 (2004) Vicki Dawn FOHEY, Respondent, v. Kevin Lee KNICKERBOCKER, Appellant. No. ED 82779. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. March 30, 2004. *731 Casey J. Welch, Hannibal, MO, for appellant. Joseph A. Brannon, New London, MO, for respondent. LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.
In re Application to the Bar of Statepublic domain
On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou
in Re Eduardo Del Pinopublic domain
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Jamie Lykins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Feb 13 2015, 7:50 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Ryan D. Bower
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
Fitts v. Eberlinpublic domain
626 F.Supp.2d 724 (2009) Anthony Lamar FITTS, Petitioner, v. Michele EBERLIN, Respondent. Case No. 5:08CV660. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 17, 2009. *725 Anthony Lamar Fitts, St. Clairsville, OH, pro se. Gene D. Park, Office of the Attorney General, Columbus, OH, for Respondent. <
Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi
Bresler v. Rockpublic domain
BROWN, P.J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal by plaintiff-appellant, Darrell Bresler, from decisions and entries of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying appellant's motion for new trial and entering judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Brent Rock, Daniel Taylor, and Samie Solomon (collectively "appellees"), on appellant's claim for age discrimination. {¶
Sjunde Ap-Fonden v. Activision Blizzardpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SJUNDE AP-FONDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-1001-KSJM ) ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ) ROBERT KOTICK, BRIAN KELLY, ) ROBERT MORGADO, ROBERT ) CORTI, HENDRIK HARTONG III,
Sjunde Ap-Fonden v. Activision Blizzardpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SJUNDE AP-FONDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-1001-KSJM ) ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ) ROBERT KOTICK, BRIAN KELLY, ) ROBERT MORGADO, ROBERT ) CORTI, HENDRIK HARTONG III,
Gaeta v. Morganpublic domain
Levine, J. Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Stolarik, J.), entered June 12, 1990 in Rockland County, which denied motions by defendant Lynn E. Urban for, inter alia, summary judgment dismissing the complaints in action Nos. 1 and 2 against her and by defendants Anne P. MacKinnon and John A. MacKinnon for, inter alia, summar
People v. Danielspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Timothy J. Flaherty, J. During a home visit of a parolee by Senior Parole Officer John Zwaryczuk, the defendant made admissions which in turn led to the seizure of certain contraband all of which the People seek to introduce at defendant’s trial. Determination of the motion to suppress now before this court for hearing and decision requires the court to address certain issues left open b