Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dawn M. Quinn”
United States v. Laquann Dawnpublic domain
SMITH, Circuit Judge. LaQuann Dawn challenges the sentence he received after pleading guilty to possessing with the intent to distribute more than five grams of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base (“crack cocaine”), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(B)(iii). He specifically challenges the district court’s application of the career-offender enhancement u
Christensen v. Quinnpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge. Pending are motions for summary judgment by all defendants. Plaintiff, Daniel Reed Christensen, opposes each motion, and separately moves for summary judgment against defendants Humane Society of the United States, Wayne Pacelle, Scottlund Haisley, Dr. Dawn Dale, Dr. Adam Bauknecht, United Animal Nations, Ti
Dawn M. Varley v. Eva B. Waltherpublic domain
APPEALS COURT DAWN M. VARLEY vs. EVA B. WALTHER Docket: 24-P-511 Dates: February 11, 2025 – May 16, 2025 Present: Massin
Dawn Hanson v. Chris LeVanpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐1840 DAWN HANSON, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellees, v. CHRIS LEVAN, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nort
Dawn Hanson v. Chris LeVanpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐1840 DAWN HANSON, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellees, v. CHRIS LEVAN, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nort
In re the Termination of: IM.- M. & Z.M. - M.public domain
Korsmo, J. ¶30 (dissenting) — This court has no ability to find facts. Since the trial court found the alleged facts on which the defense rested to be unproven, we have no ability to find otherwise. Accordingly, I dissent. ¶31 The critical portion of this case is found in the trial court’s oral remarks, summing up its judgment: Compellingly, Mr. [sic] Smitham testified that he did no
State of Iowa v. Dawn Denise Dunn-Gridleypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0941 Filed April 19, 2017 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DAWN DENISE DUNN-GRIDLEY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Van Buren County, Randy S. DeGeest, Judge. Dawn Dunn-Gridley appeals from her conviction after a jury trial for three c
Kenneth and Dawn Deschler v. Girish Vallabhan, M.D.public domain
NO. 07-04-0241-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 ______________________________ KENNETH AND DAWN DESCHLER, APPELLANT</
Summer Dawn Teeters v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-08-0287-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E DECEMBER 11, 2008 ______________________________ WILLIAM DUNCAN ELLISON,
Albert v. Zoning Hearing Boardpublic domain
854 A.2d 401 (2004) Dawn ALBERT, d/b/a The Waverly Retreat v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF NORTH ABINGTON TOWNSHIP North Abington Township v. Zoning Hearing Board of North Abington Township Ernest J. D'Agata and Hollis D'Agata, his Wife and William D. Donahoe and Mary Carroll Donahoe, his Wife and Charles Curtain, M.D. and Judith Curtain, his Wife v. Zoning Hearing Board of North Abington Township. Appeal of Ernest J. D'Aga
Marion Brecheisen v. Tessa Dawn Brecheisen, Michael Keith Brecheisen, and Rabo Agrifinance, Inc.public domain
SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS SET FOR SUBMISSION ON ORAL ARGUMENT MONDAY, April 6, 2015 AT 9:00 A.M. (Before Chief Justice Brian Quinn, Justice James T. Campbell, Justice Patrick A. Pirtle) 07-14-00105-CV Marion Brecheisen v. Tessa Dawn Hansford County Brecheisen, Michael Keith Brecheisen, and Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. Richard Naylor – Appellant
Michael Shelby James v. Kimberly Dawn Jamespublic domain
NO. 07-03-0415-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D DECEMBER 20, 2004 ______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF S. M. J., J. E. J. AND J. P. J., CHILDREN
Michael Shelby James v. Kimberly Dawn Jamespublic domain
NO. 07-03-0415-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D DECEMBER 20, 2004 ______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF S. M. J., J. E.
Michael Shelby James v. Kimberly Dawn Jamespublic domain
NO. 07-03-0415-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D DECEMBER 20, 2004 ______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF S. M. J., J. E. J.
in the Interest of M.R., a Childpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00041-CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.R., A CHILD On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 90230-E, Honorable Carry Baker, Presiding
Quinn v. Walshpublic domain
Duffly, J. Does a complaint alleging that a defendant engaged in an extramarital affair in order to injure a plaintiff spouse *697survive the statutory abolition2 of the common-law torts of alienation of affection and criminal conversation? Concluding that such a complaint stated no case, a judge of the Superior Court dismissed it. The spouse,
Ruef v. Quinnpublic domain
Ford, J. Each of the above captioned cases is a medical malpractice case. In each of the three cases, Donald W. Goodrich, Esq., of Donovan & O’Connor, represents the plaintiffs, and Ronald E. Oliveira, Esq. (hereafter “Oliveira”) represents one of the defendants.1 The plaintiffs have now moved to disqualify Oliveira from further representation of the defendants, on the ground that Dawn M. Rich, Es
Peterson v. BENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTERpublic domain
717 N.W.2d 404 (2006) Dawn C. PETERSON, Respondent, v. BENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTER/Self-Insured Berkley Risk Admin. Co., Relators, and RS Medical, Lakewalk Surgery Center, SMDC Health System, Wolverine Anesthesia, and Noridian/Medicare, Intervenors. No. A06-583. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 10, 2006. Edward Q. Cassidy, Karen M. Charlson, Felhaber Larson Fenlon
Dawn v. Stern Equipment Co.public domain
134 A.2d 341 (1957) James E. DAWN, Jr., Appellant, v. STERN EQUIPMENT CO., Inc., a corporation, Appellee. No. 1970. Municipal Court of Appeals District of Columbia. Submitted May 27, 1957. Decided August 16, 1957. *342 Hallock P. Long and Carleton M. Long, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Charles B. Sulli
Beye v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of NJpublic domain
568 F.Supp.2d 556 (2008) Dawn BEYE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, et al., Defendants. Suzanne Foley, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, et al., Defendants. Civil Case Nos. 06-5337, 06-6219. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 1, 2008. *5