Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Davis v. USPS”
Kristopher Jackson v. USPSpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0231p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ KRISTOPHER JACKSON, │ Plaintiff-Appellant
Anatol Zukerman v. USPSpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 7, 2020 Decided June 9, 2020 No. 19-5168 ANATOL ZUKERMAN AND CHARLES KRAUSE REPORTING, LLC, A D.C. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the Di
Davis v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
NLRB v. USPSpublic domain
477 F.3d 263 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 05-61168. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 26, 2007. Curtis Wells, Regional Dir., NLRB, Fort Worth, TX, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Meredith Lee Jason, Kellie J. Isb
Davis v. Potterpublic domain
301 F.Supp.2d 850 (2004) Arthur L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. 03 C 4155. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 5, 2004. *851 *852 *853 Arthur L. Dav
Davis v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
ORDER The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Davis v. Brittinpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ANTHONY L. DAVIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-cv-0092 (APM)
Davis v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. In this opinion, we consider whether an employee is required to leave her employment or demonstrate that her performance at work suffered in order to vindicate her right to be free of a hostile work environment. Janet Davis, a postal employee, brought this action against the United States Postal Service and related parties (collectively “USPS”) alleging
Davis v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
934 F.Supp. 1210 (1996) Janet DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-WY-1421-AJ. United States District Court, D. Colorado. July 11, 1996. *1211 John F.X. McBride, Hart & Trinen, Denver, CO, John Joseph Zodrow, Denver, CO, for plaintiff. William G. Pharo, United States Attorne
Sawyers, V. v. Davis, N.public domain
J-A11027-19 2019 PA Super 319 VICTOR R. SAWYERS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :
Sawyers v. v. Davis, N.public domain
J-A11027-19 2019 PA Super 319 VICTOR R. SAWYERS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :
DesRoches v. USPSpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robert P. DesRoches v. Case N o . 05-CV-088-PB Opinion N o . 2009 DNH 062 John E . Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The United States Postal Service (“USPS”) has filed a counterclaim for unjust enrichment seeking to recover $317,325.25 in bac
Davis v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Davis v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Brian Davis v. Charles Samuels, Jr.public domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 18-1204 _____________ BRIAN A. DAVIS; FREDERICKA K. BECKFORD, Appellants v. CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMINISTRATOR, Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch
Davis v. Crosspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ANTHONY LAMONT DAVIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-761 (RJL)
Davis v. Crosspublic domain
774 F.Supp.2d 62 (2011) Anthony Lamont DAVIS, Petitioner, v. James N. CROSS, Respondent. Civil Case No. 10-761 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 27, 2011. Anthony Lamont Davis, Bruceton Mills, WV, pro se. MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. This case is currently before the Court on
Davis v. Mukaseypublic domain
669 F.Supp.2d 45 (2009) Roy Steve DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Michael MUKASEY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-452 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 16, 2009. *46 Roy Steve Davis, Inez, KY, pro se. Kenneth Adebonojo, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants.
Davis v. Mukaseypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _____________________________________ ) ROY STEVE DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-452 (CKK) ) MICHAEL MUKASEY, et al.,
David Mark Davis II v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00296-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 12/26/2014 12:18:52 PM