⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Davis v. USPS”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0231p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ KRISTOPHER JACKSON, │ Plaintiff-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020-06-09 · Published · cited 50× · 961 F.3d 431
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 7, 2020 Decided June 9, 2020 No. 19-5168 ANATOL ZUKERMAN AND CHARLES KRAUSE REPORTING, LLC, A D.C. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the Di
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 568 U.S. 987; 133 S. Ct. 541
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
NLRB v. USPSpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007-01-26 · Published · cited 1× · 477 F.3d 263
477 F.3d 263 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 05-61168. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 26, 2007. Curtis Wells, Regional Dir., NLRB, Fort Worth, TX, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Meredith Lee Jason, Kellie J. Isb
Davis v. Potterpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004-02-05 · Published · cited 3× · 301 F. Supp. 2d 850; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2105; 2004 WL 242895
301 F.Supp.2d 850 (2004) Arthur L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. 03 C 4155. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 5, 2004. *851 *852 *853 Arthur L. Dav
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-07-19 · Published · cited 0× · 42 F. App'x 468
ORDER The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Davis v. Brittinpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ANTHONY L. DAVIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-cv-0092 (APM)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998-05-06 · Published · cited 149× · 142 F.3d 1334; 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2201; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8991; 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,418; 76 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1515; 1998 WL 223478
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. In this opinion, we consider whether an employee is required to leave her employment or demonstrate that her performance at work suffered in order to vindicate her right to be free of a hostile work environment. Janet Davis, a postal employee, brought this action against the United States Postal Service and related parties (collectively “USPS”) alleging
District Court, D. Colorado · 1996-07-11 · Published · cited 5× · 934 F. Supp. 1210; 1996 WL 450362
934 F.Supp. 1210 (1996) Janet DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-WY-1421-AJ. United States District Court, D. Colorado. July 11, 1996. *1211 John F.X. McBride, Hart & Trinen, Denver, CO, John Joseph Zodrow, Denver, CO, for plaintiff. William G. Pharo, United States Attorne
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-10-22 · Published · cited 0× · 222 A.3d 1; 2019 Pa. Super. 319
J-A11027-19 2019 PA Super 319 VICTOR R. SAWYERS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-10-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Pa. Super. 319
J-A11027-19 2019 PA Super 319 VICTOR R. SAWYERS : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :
DesRoches v. USPSpublic domain
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2009 DNH 062
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robert P. DesRoches v. Case N o . 05-CV-088-PB Opinion N o . 2009 DNH 062 John E . Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The United States Postal Service (“USPS”) has filed a counterclaim for unjust enrichment seeking to recover $317,325.25 in bac
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 498 U.S. 852; 111 S. Ct. 145
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1990-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 498 U.S. 852
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-06-11 · Published · cited 69× · 962 F.3d 105
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 18-1204 _____________ BRIAN A. DAVIS; FREDERICKA K. BECKFORD, Appellants v. CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMINISTRATOR, Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch
Davis v. Crosspublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ANTHONY LAMONT DAVIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-761 (RJL)
Davis v. Crosspublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-03-27 · Published · cited 5× · 774 F. Supp. 2d 62; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32037; 2011 WL 1119650
774 F.Supp.2d 62 (2011) Anthony Lamont DAVIS, Petitioner, v. James N. CROSS, Respondent. Civil Case No. 10-761 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 27, 2011. Anthony Lamont Davis, Bruceton Mills, WV, pro se. MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. This case is currently before the Court on
Davis v. Mukaseypublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-11-16 · Published · cited 12× · 669 F. Supp. 2d 45; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106460; 2009 WL 3806392
669 F.Supp.2d 45 (2009) Roy Steve DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Michael MUKASEY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-452 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 16, 2009. *46 Roy Steve Davis, Inez, KY, pro se. Kenneth Adebonojo, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants.
Davis v. Mukaseypublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2009-11-16 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _____________________________________ ) ROY STEVE DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-452 (CKK) ) MICHAEL MUKASEY, et al.,
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2014-12-26 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-14-00296-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 12/26/2014 12:18:52 PM