Cases

Filed 8/19/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SCOTT DAVIS, Plaintiff and A156234 Respondent, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. STEFAN KOZAK et al., RG18907104) Defendants and Appellants. SCOTT DAVIS,

Filed 8/19/20; Reposting final version CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SCOTT DAVIS, Plaintiff and Respondent, A156234 v. (Alameda County STEFAN KOZAK et al., Super. Ct. No. RG18907104) Defenda

This is an appeal by defendant R.D. Davis from a judgment convicting him of possession of heroin, in violation of Health and Safety Code, section 11500. On January 9, 1963, commencing at 11 a.m., the Oakland police had under surveillance the premises at 1422 Brush Street. They observed a car pull into its driveway, heard its horn sounded, and saw Freddie Harrington, known to the police as a dealer in and user of narcotics, alight from the car,

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant Pamela Kotcher appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Thomas J. McAvoy, Judge, dismissing her claim under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. This case arises from Kotcher’s allegations that defendant-appellee Herbert Trag

258 Pa. Superior Ct. 224 (1978) 392 A.2d 766 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. William DAVIS, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted September 12, 1977. Decided October 20, 1978. *226 John W. Packel, Assistant Public Defender, and Benjamin Lerner, Defender, Philadelphia, for appellant. M

744 F.2d 255 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,564, 5 Employee Benefits Ca 2706NORLIN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ROONEY, PACE INC., Patrick J. Rooney, Piezo ElectricProducts, Inc. and John Does 2-10, Defendants-Appellees,PIEZO ELECTRIC PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant and Counterclaimant-Appellee,v.NORLIN CORPORATION, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,andAndean Enterprises, Inc., Norlin Industries, Inc., NortonStevens,

McGuiness, P.J. *718Plaintiff Maya Baxter sued her former employer, defendant Genworth North America Corporation (Genworth), for wrongful termination and related causes of action arising out of her employment. Genworth moved to compel arbitration of the dispute. On appeal from an order denying its motion to compel arbitration, Genworth contends

208 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2000) KATHLEEN KLEM, ROSEMARY KNOX,PATRICIA CHRISTMAN, and LINDA SHADWELL, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,CALIFORNIA,Defendant-Appellant.HAROLD ASSENZA, JOHN CARLSON,SHARON COOLEY, NANCY S.BENNETT, DOUG WILLIS, ALFONSO M. HACKETT, ROBERT CARGILL, ARMENIA CHAVEZ, DIANA ORTIZ-LOPEZ, ZONIA BEECHER, AMANDO CABLAS, KATHRYN CANTER, MARY CLESI, ANGELIKA

Opinion McGUINESS, P. J. In this consolidated appeal, the San Mateo County Human Services Agency (Agency) appeals from two orders of the juvenile court of San Mateo County (County) granting petitions for disclosure of the juvenile records of Elijah S. and Savannah R., filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 827, subdivision (a)(2)1 by respondents, the Hearst Corpo

49 Cal.Rptr.3d 609 (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1036 STOP LOSS INSURANCE BROKERS, INC., et al., Cross-Complainant and Appellant, v. BROWN & TOLAND MEDICAL GROUP, Cross-Defendant and Respondent. No. A110074. Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three. October 6, 2006. *610 Jones, Bell, Abbo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX, United States Magistrate Judge. BACKGROUND In July 2010, the plaintiff served timely notices of deposition on defendants Valerie Jacob (“Jacob”) and Justin Spendlove (“Spendlove”), but the defendants refused to appear for their depositions. The Court denied the defendants’ September 15, 2010 motion for a protective order, which sought to bar th

OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge. Laurie O’Reilly appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in this action that she filed under the Family Medical Leave Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 2601 et. seq. We will affirm. Since we write primarily for the parties who are familiar with this ease, we need not repeat the facts or procedural history. O’Reilly claims the District Co

BENTON, Circuit Judge. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended by the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, permits waivers of ADEA rights and claims—but only if they are “knowing and voluntary” as defined by statute. 29 U.S.C. § 626(f)(1). In a waiver dispute, “the party asserting the validity of a waiver shall have the burden of proving in a court of competent jur

858 F.2d 610 49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 67, 47 Empl. Prac.Dec. P 38,345Robert L. GRAY; Paul W. Babcock; Robert N. Cardwell;Kenneth P. Davis; Melvin P. Deweese; Gene E. Eastham;Fred M. Graham, Jr.; Stanley M. Hachinsky; Marvin R.Harbour; Roy E. Hauk; Robert P. Jones; Chester W.Martinson; Patrick C. McNellis; Elmer A. Nilges; W.E.Pickert; Charles Powell; Joseph R. Stanley; Robert E.Walsh; Dennis R. Worthin

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Davis Shikles appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment to Defendant Sprint/United Management Company (“Sprint”) in Shi-kles’ lawsuit alleging that Sprint violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., by denying him promotions and terminating him. (Aplt.App. at 12-13, 4

407 F.3d 546 Roderick CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.GENERAL DYNAMICS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Richard T. Schnorbus, Defendants, Appellants. No. 04-1828. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard January 4, 2005. Decided May 23, 2005. Arthur G. Telegen, with whom Claud

MINER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, J.) granting summary judgment to all defendants-appellees-cross-appellants, (i) dismissing his claim for employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the District Court having determined that he did not establish a prima facie case

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes on before the court on an appeal by Sandra Register, Grace B. Merchant, Susan L. Wilson, Kristina Beck-man, John J. Daggett, and Richard Rhoades, (“appellants”), from the district court’s order entered on November 21, 2005, granting PNC Financial Service

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;  CLEO PAGE; DEBORAH GUNTER; KAREN WILLIAMSON; CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI; EDITH ARANA, No. 04-16688 Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No. v. CV-01-02252-MJJ WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellant.  BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON;  CLEO PAGE; D

PUBLISHED Filed: August 9, 2005 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA ANDERSON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, and SHERMAN T. LOTT; VERNELLE PAYTON; LARRY COLEMAN; AVA HAWKINS; CURTIS YOUNG; CLINTON EDWARDS, JR.; FRANCIS H. NEWMAN, JR.; SAMUEL QUILLER; PAMELA WADE; BENNIE BREELAND; GLENN STEPHENSON; KENNETH L. BRADY, SR.; CLYDE REED; ROBIN