⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Davis v. Fahey”

Davis v. Faheypublic domain
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1947-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 12 Mass. App. Div. 130
' Donovan, J. In this action of contract the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $500.00 on what he alleges is a written agreement, a copy of which as if appears in his declaration- ¡being as follows: “I hereby agree to divide equally with Henry H. Davis whatever fees or moneys paid to me as attorney for the executors of the estate of J. J. Lamson, late of Belmont, Mass., intending hereby
State v. Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022-07-26 · Published · cited 2× · 344 Conn. 122
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. BROCK DAVIS (SC 20335) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Convicted of the crime of murder in connection with the stabbing death of the victim, the defendant appealed to this court, claiming, inter alia, that the trial court had violated his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel by failing to con
State v. Davispublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021-03-26 · Published · cited 4× · 338 Conn. 458
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Fahey v. Faheypublic domain
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2012-11-20 · Published · cited 42× · 482 B.R. 678; 68 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 970; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 5441; 57 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 69
LAMOUTTE, Bankruptcy Judge. Charles Raso (“Raso”) appeals from a bankruptcy court order granting summary judgment in favor of the debtor, James M. Fahey, Jr. (“Fahey”), on Count II of Raso’s § 523(a)(4)1 complaint seeking a determination that certain unpaid contributions to multiple employee benefit plans were nondischargeable. The bankruptcy court found that Raso failed to establish that Fahey act
State v. Davispublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017-11-28 · Published · cited 3× · 175 A.3d 71; 178 Conn. App. 324
MULLINS, J. This case returns to us on remand from our Supreme Court; see State v. Davis , 325 Conn. 918 ,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
08/06/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 1, 2024 KENNETH MERRITT v CHRISTIAN FAHEY ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-0007-22 Mary L. Wagner, Judge ___________________________________
People v. Davispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 120 A.D.3d 1530; 992 N.Y.S.2d 654
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered June 15, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
People v. Davispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 122 A.D.3d 1345; 996 N.Y.S.2d 202
Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Fahey, Carni and Whalen, JJ.
People v. Davispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 120 A.D.3d 1530; 992 N.Y.S.2d 654
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered June 15, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
People v. Davispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-03-21 · Published · cited 13× · 115 A.D.3d 1167; 982 N.Y.S.2d 230
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered March 30, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the s
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012-05-14 · Published · cited 2× · 470 B.R. 649; 2012 WL 1682576
470 B.R. 649 (2012) In re James M. FAHEY, Jr., Debtor. Charles Raso, Plaintiff, v. James M. Fahey, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 11-10505-WCH. Adversary No. 11-1118. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Eastern Division. May 14, 2012. *650 Catherine M. Campbell and Melissa A. Brennan, Feinberg, Campbell & Zack, P
People v. Davispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 115 A.D.3d 1239; 982 N.Y.S.2d 272
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered July 10, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for resentencing. Mem
Davis v. Boeheimpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013-10-04 · Published · cited 1× · 110 A.D.3d 1431; 972 N.Y.S.2d 385
Smith and Fahey, JJ. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent because we cannot agree with the majority’s conclusion that Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), for failure to state a cause of action. In our view, the statements of James Boeheim (defendant) of which plaintiffs complain constitute *1434“mixed
People v. Davispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-03-21 · Published · cited 2× · 115 A.D.3d 1239; 982 N.Y.S.2d 272
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered July 10, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Erie County Court for resentencing. Mem
People v. Davispublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 115 A.D.3d 1167; 982 N.Y.S.2d 230
Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered March 30, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the s
Davis v. Boeheimpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 110 A.D.3d 1431; 972 N.Y.S.2d 385
Smith and Fahey, JJ. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent because we cannot agree with the majority’s conclusion that Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), for failure to state a cause of action. In our view, the statements of James Boeheim (defendant) of which plaintiffs complain constitute *1434“mixed
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN FAHEY, On behalf of the general public of the District of Columbia, Case No. 18-cv-2047 (CRC) Plaintiff, v. DEOLEO USA, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kevin Fahey contends that Defen
New York Court of Appeals · 2016-11-21 · Published · cited 32× · 28 N.Y.3d 294; 66 N.E.3d 1076
Rivera, J. (dissenting in part). Defendant was convicted for the death of a 41-year-old, well-developed male who was six feet, one inch, weighed 270 pounds, and suffered from hypertensive cardiovascular disease, on the theory that the injuries suffered during a struggle with the defendant precipitated the victim’s death from heart disease. To establish defendant’s *304guil
New York Court of Appeals · 2015-12-16 · Published · cited 228× · 26 N.Y.3d 563; 46 N.E.3d 614; 26 N.Y.S.3d 231
OPINION OF THE COURT Fahey, J. This action arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred after nonparty Lorraine A. Walsh was treated at defendant South Nassau Communities Hospital by defendants Regina E. Hammock, DO and Christine DeLuca, RPA-C, that is, medical professionals employed by defendant Island Medical Physicians, P.C. (collectively, Island Medic
New York Court of Appeals · 2015-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 24 N.Y.3d 1197; 2015 NY Slip Op 63715; 27 N.E.3d 850; 4 N.Y.S.3d 147; 2015 N.Y. LEXIS 198
Motion by the Medical Society of the State of New York et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted *1198only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and nine copies filed within seven days. Judges Stein and Fahey taking no part.