Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Davis v. Diversified Collection Services Incorporated”
Davis v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAYLOR, District Judge. This is an action claiming unlawful debt collection. It arises out of a series of telephone calls between plaintiff Jamie Davis and various employees of defendant Diversified Consultants, Inc., a debt collection agency. Davis contends that, by the mode and manner in which they called him, DCI and its employees viol
Anderson v. CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.public domain
322 F.Supp.2d 1094 (2004) Dawn Marie ANDERSON, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES, INC. Defendant. No. 04-CV-0347W(RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. June 9, 2004. *1095 Law Offices of Steven A Wickman, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff. Tim J. Vande
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this case, Plaintiff Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ (SEIU or the Union) argues that a number of its members were discharged in violation of an agreement the Union had with Defendant Diversified Services Group, Inc. (Diversified). SEIU
The Diversified Group Incorporatedpublic domain
United States Tax Court 166 T.C. No. 2 THE DIVERSIFIED GROUP INCORPORATED, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent JAMES HABER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Young v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.public domain
(2008) Waverly C. YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 07-4808 (MJD/AJB). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 21, 2008. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees and Cost
SUBSTITUTE OPINION. THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED JUNE 17, 2014 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN. ■EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Ada County by Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center from a jury verdict awarding damages totaling $52,084,513 against it for breach of contract and tortious conduct regarding MRI Associates, LLP, and its two limited partnerships that owned and operated ma
Gray Diversified Asset Management, Inc. v. Canellispublic domain
By Judge Jonathan C. Thacher This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions. After considering the pleadings, the evidence, the oral and written arguments of counsel, and the relevant legal authority, the Court grants the motion. Background Karen Canellis and Gray Diversified Asset Management, Inc. (Gray) were business associates, engaged in the busines
Edwards v. OSI Collection Servs., Inc.public domain
Kent J. Dawson, United States District Judge Presently, the Court has before it Defendant OSI Collection Services, Inc.'s *959("Defendant") Motion to Dismiss or, alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment (# 4). Plaintiff filed a response (# 8) as well as an affidavit (# 9) in opposition. Defendant filed a reply (# 10).2
Dalton Diversified, Inc. v. AmSouth Bankpublic domain
605 S.E.2d 892 (2004) 270 Ga. App. 203 DALTON DIVERSIFIED, INC. v. AMSOUTH BANK. No. A04A2344. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 27, 2004. *894 Davis, Kreitzer, Kemp, Joiner & Melton, John W. Davis, Jr., F. Gregory Melton, Dalton, for appellant. Miller & Martin, Geoffrey H. Cederholm, Wil
Taylor v. Davis (In re Davis)public domain
Chapter 7 ORDER David R. Duncan, Chief US Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding comes before the Court on the amended complaint of the plaintiffs, Andrew Taylor and Naomi Taylor (“Plaintiffs”), seeking a determination that a debt owed to them by the debtor and defendant, Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr. (“Defendant”) is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(4), and (a)(
439 B.R. 231 (2010) In re PHOENIX DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Debtor. Kenneth A. Welt, Chapter 7 Trustee of Phoenix Diversified Investment Corporation, Plaintiff, v. EfloorTrade, LLC; John Moore, individually; Kyle H. Kelley, individually; Kelley Goldberg Leach and Cohn, P.L.; and CCIP Orlando, Ltd., LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-15917-EPK. Adversary No. 10-03113-EPK. United States Ban
171 S.W.3d 461 (2005) SOUTHWEST INVESTMENTS DIVERSIFIED, INC., Appellant v. ESTATE OF Marilyn Gail MIESZKUC, Appellee. Southwest Investments Diversified, Inc., Appellant v. Bernd J. Linden, Bobby R. Jackson, D.A. Culwell, David Wight, James C. Patterson, Jeanne E. Abernathy, L.S. Brown, Marjorie H. Patterson, Michael G. Abernathy, Peter R.L. Hall, Phillip M. Cox, Richard F. Gay, Robert J. Bacon, Jr., Shelly Lesikar, Warren H. Badger,
715 F.Supp.2d 871 (2010) BEST BUY STORES, L.P., Plaintiff, v. DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REATY CORPORATION, Benderson-Wainberg Associates, LP, DDR MDT Cool Springs Point LLC, DDRA Ahwatukee Foothills, LLC, DDR Flatiron LLC, DDRA Community Centers Four, LP, DDR MDT Lakepointe Crossing, LP, DDR MDT Great Northern, LLC, DDR MDT Shoppers World, LLC, DDR MDT Riverdale Village Outer Ring, LLC, DDR Hendon Nassau Park II, LP, DDRC PDK Salisbury LLC, DDR MDT
303 B.R. 660 (2004) In re Jose Orlando MATUS, Jr., Debtor. Eastern Diversified Distributors, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Jose Orlando Matus, Jr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-93358-CRM, Adversary No. 02-9303-CRM. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 21, 2004. *661 *662
Davis v. RiverSource Life Insurance Co.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge Now pending before the Court is Defendants RiverSource Life Insurance Company (“RiverSource”) and Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.’s (“Ameriprise”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Paul M. Davis’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Having carefully reviewed all parties’ papers an
Diversified Computer Services, Inc. v. Town of Yorkpublic domain
104 Ill. App.3d 852 (1982) 433 N.E.2d 726 DIVERSIFIED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE TOWN OF YORK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 81-2. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed March 22, 1982. Barry E. Garley, of Oak Brook, J. Edward Vertovec, of Elmhurst, and Jack M. Siegel, of Chicago, for appellant. J
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
In re Pioneer Health Services, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART MOTION TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN CLAIMANTS AS CRITICAL VENDORS AND TO APPROVE CRITICAL VENDOR PAYMENTS FOR EMERGENCY ROOM PHYSICIANS Judge Neil P. Olack, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 24, 2017 (the “Hearing”), on the Motion to Establish Certain Claimants as Critical Vendors and to Approve Critical Vendor Paymen
Wiggins v. Physiologic Assessment Services, LLCpublic domain
OPINION SCOTT, J. Defendant Jordan Klear" (“Klear”) has moved to dismiss Plaintiffs, Cheryl Wiggins (“Plaintiff’), amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 12(b)(2). For the foliowing reasons, Klear’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Background
World Fuel Services v. Nambe Pueblo Developmentpublic domain
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Nambe Pueblo Development Corporation's1 Motion to Dismiss, filed October 1, 2018 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on December 21, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, wherein Plaintiff World Fuel Services, Inc. -- a non