Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Davis v. Block Drug Co.”
Estate of Block v. Estate of Beckerpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/17/2023 09:04 AM CDT - 818 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 313 Nebraska Reports ESTATE OF BLOCK V. ESTATE OF BECKER Cite as 313 Neb. 818 Estate of Clay Block by
Dale v. United States Drug Enforcement Agencypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CURTIS LEE DALE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-1248 (EGS)
Davis v. Wicomico Co. Bureaupublic domain
Justin Davis v. Wicomico County Bureau, No. 46, Sept. Term, 2015 Opinion by Battaglia, J. CIVIL PROCEDURE - RES JUDICATA A party’s failure to appeal a judgment entered against him in 2011 in a child-support enforcement proceeding in which the hearing Judge found that his execution of an affidavit of parentage was not the result of fraud, duress, or material mistake of fact precludes his ability under res judicata to relitigate his claim two years later in which he contested legal parentage bas
Davis v. Crescent Electric Supply, Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Crescent Electric Supply Company’s (“CESCO” or “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Lisa A. Davis (“Davis” or “Plaintiff’). According to Davis, this federal action is based primarily on wage discrimi
United States v. Roshawn Davispublic domain
USCA11 Case: 22-12971 Document: 73-1 Date Filed: 03/13/2025 Page: 1 of 36 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12971 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Milton Hodosh and Richardson-Vicks, Inc. v. Block Drug Company, Inc., Block Drug Corp., and Dentco, Inc.public domain
MARKEY, Chief Judge. Certified question from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey relating to a “staple article of commerce” inquiry arising in consideration of a motion for summary judgment of patent misuse. I. Background Milton Hodosh and exclusive licensee Richardson-Vicks (Hodosh)
State v. Davispublic domain
[Cite as State v. Davis, 2019-Ohio-4692.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 18AP-921 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CR-2984) Ray C. Davis, Jr., :
United States v. Shakeen Davispublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-4250 Doc: 166 Filed: 06/12/2024 Pg: 1 of 46 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-4620 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RANDY BANKS, a/k/a Dirt, Defendant – Appellant.
Anthony Juniper v. Melvin Davispublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-9 Doc: 70 Filed: 07/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 102 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-9 ANTHONY BERNARD JUNIPER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. MELVIN C. DAVIS, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison, Respo
Tammy Watkins v. Officer Lawrence Davispublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-13616 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2025 Page: 1 of 52 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13616 ____________________ TAMMY WATKINS,
People v. Davispublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and integrity of this
Noguera v. Davispublic domain
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, United States District Judge I. BACKGROUND Petitioner William A. Noguera is currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pursuant to a judgment of the Superior Court of California, Orange County, following his April 29, 1987 conviction of the first-degree murder (
Vasquez v. Davispublic domain
ORDER ON PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jimmy Joseph Vasquez is an inmate in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections (“CDOC”) and housed at the Sterling Correctional Facility (“Sterling”). (ECF No. 113 ¶ 1.) He is infected with the hepatitis C virus (“HCV”). (Id. ¶ 42.) Vasquez brings this lawsuit under the Eighth Amendme
Davis, Franklinpublic domain
ap-77,031 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/29/2015 9:52:31 AM August 4, 2015 Accepted 8/3/2015 3:17:52 PM
Mendoza v. Drug Enforcement Administrationpublic domain
465 F.Supp.2d 5 (2006) Joe Louie MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-0591 (ESH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 20, 2006. *8 Joe Louie Mendoza, Herlong, CA, pro se. Wyneva Johnson, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendant.
Davis v. AVVO, Inc.public domain
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff, Kevin Davis, brings this action on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated individuals against the defendant, Avvo, Inc. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant, through its website, has engaged in and contributed to false advertising in violation of Lanham Act § 43(a), 15 U.S
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. On September 28, 2012, the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) decided that Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited (“Ranbaxy”) had not forfeited its eligibility for 180-day exclusivity to market generic valsarían tablets. Because of this decision, plaintiffs Mylan Laboratories Limited and Mylan Pharma
State v. Davispublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 11:04:04 2015.11.23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number
Davis v. Sarlespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Judy Davis is the mother of co-plaintiffs Zuri, Tavares, and Solomon Davis. Proceeding pro se, plaintiffs bring this suit alleging violations of their civil rights against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”); Richard Sarles
State v. Davispublic domain
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number:______________ 3 Filing Date: October 19, 2015 4 NO. S-1-SC-34548 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 6 Plaintiff-Petitioner, 7 v. 8 NORMAN DAVIS, 9 Defendant-Respondent. 10 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI 11 John M. Paternoster, District Judge 12 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 13 Martha Anne Kelly, Assistant Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Petitioner 16 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Publ