⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Davis, III v. Tidal Petroleum, Inc.”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-04-12 · Published · cited 22× · 219 So. 3d 349; 2016 La.App. 1 Cir. 0230; 2017 La. App. LEXIS 635
CALLOWAY, J. | ¡/The protracted litigation in this case involves mineral rights and royalties associated with a production well, IP Pet. PPCQ No. 1 well, located on a certain tract of land owned by the plaintiffs in Terre-bonne Parish (hereinafter “St. Martin property”). In this appeal, the defendants IP Petroleum Company, Inc. (hereinafter “IP Petroleum”) and International Paper Company challenge a trial court judgment on re
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-09-08 · Published · cited 26× · 503 S.W.3d 9; 2016 WL 4706466
OPINION Martha Hill Jamison, Justice Who, if anyone, speaks for a Mexican union when the union leadership is mired in scandal? That is the central question in this three-way appeal concerning enforcement of a purported 2004 settlement agreement (the “Garnished Funds Agreement”) attempting to finally resolve 30 years of litigation. Among other things, the Garnished Funds Agreement provided for the distribution
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995-08-08 · Published · cited 220× · 62 F.3d 1512; 35 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1641; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21069; 1995 WL 468346
NIES, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom ARCHER, Chief Judge, joins Part IV, Sections C2-4, D, and E. I dissent. I concur in Judge Plager’s dissent on the issue of infringement to the extent of his eloquent statement of the problem. However, I conclude that the determination of infringement under the “Doctrine of Equivalents,” as articulated in Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.,
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-03-26 · Published · cited 40× · 301 F.R.D. 31; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41291; 2014 WL 1243685
OPINION AND ORDER HENRY PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction By notice of motion dated July 10, 2013 (Docket Item 230), defendants Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and The Yield Book, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) move for an Order pursuant to Rules 16, 26, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1) striking the Fourth Declaration of Dr. Jia
Supreme Court of the United States · 1988-05-16 · Published · cited 117× · 98 L. Ed. 2d 877; 108 S. Ct. 791; 484 U.S. 469; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 939
*472Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court. The issue here is whether the State of Mississippi, when it entered the Union in 1817, took title to lands lying under waters that were influenced by the tide running in the Gulf of Mexico, but were not navigable in fact. > — 1 As the Mississippi Sup
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2225 THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, by and through its agency, the North Carolina Department of Administration, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALCOA POWER GENERATING, INC., Defendant - Appellee. -------------------------
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-05-03 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2225 THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, by and through its agency, the North Carolina Department of Administration, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALCOA POWER GENERATING, INC., Defendant - Appellee. -------------------------
Supreme Court of Florida · 1986-05-15 · Published · cited 25× · 492 So. 2d 339
492 So.2d 339 (1986) COASTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, et al., Respondents. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, et al., Respondents. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND of the State of Florida, Petitioner, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Respondent. Nos. 65696, 6575
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017-11-29 · Published · cited 2× · 280 F. Supp. 3d 324
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY OR ENJOIN ARBITRATION HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: This declaratory action pits the owner of a Bahamas-flag ocean going passenger ship against the American affiliate of a Danish supplier of marine fuel oils who contracted with the shipowner to fuel the vessel at a Greek port, and initiated arbitration proceedings in London when the
California Court of Appeal · 2008-08-11 · Published · cited 29× · 165 Cal. App. 4th 1163; 81 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797; 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1228
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1165 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1166 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009-09-21 · Published · cited 91× · 582 F.3d 309; 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20215; 69 ERC (BNA) 1385; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20873; 2009 WL 2996729
582 F.3d 309 (2009) State of CONNECTICUT, State of New York, People of the State of California ex rel. Attorney General Bill Lockyer, State of Iowa, State of New Jersey, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin, and City of New York, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC., American Electric Power Service Corporation, Southern Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Xcel Energy, Inc., and Cinergy Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-04-03 · Published · cited 8× · 853 F.3d 140; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5691; 2017 WL 1216573
KING, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Unlike my friends in the panel majority and on the district court, I am satisfied that the disputed 45-mile segment of the majestic Yadkin River belongs to the people of North Carolina. I therefore write separately in dissent. The district court and the majority — in ruling against the State of North Carolina — have erred in several respects. To start, the federal court system s
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011-08-19 · Published · cited 2× · 791 F. Supp. 2d 431; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93019; 2011 WL 2119256
791 F.Supp.2d 431 (2011) ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PCS NITROGEN, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Ross Development Corporation; J. Holcombe Enterprises, L.P.; James H. Holcombe; J. Henry Fair, Jr.; Allwaste Tank Cleaning, Inc. n/k/a PSC Container Services, LLC; Robin Hood Container Express, Inc.; City of Charleston, South Carolina, Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-2782-MBS.<
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2010-10-13 · Published · cited 0× · 746 F. Supp. 2d 692; 2010 WL 4025885
746 F.Supp.2d 692 (2010) ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PCS NITROGEN, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Ross Development Corporation; J. Holcombe Enterprises, L.P.; James H. Holcombe; J. Henry Fair, Jr.; Allwaste Tank Cleaning, Inc. n/k/a PSC Container Services, LLC; Robin Hood Container Express, Inc.; City of Charleston, South Carolina, Third-Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05-cv-2782-MBS.<
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007-06-13 · Published · cited 57× · 924 A.2d 447; 191 N.J. 344; 2007 N.J. LEXIS 694
924 A.2d 447 (2007) 191 N.J. 344 GALLENTHIN REALTY DEVELOPMENT, INC., a New Jersey Corporation and/or George A. and Cynthia L. Gallenthin III, h/w, both jointly and severally, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO, a New Jersey Municipality and/or Planning Board of Borough of Paulsboro and/or Paulsboro Redevelopment Agency, jointly and severally, Defendants-Respondents. Supreme Court of
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2016-01-07 · Published · cited 2× · 181 So. 3d 980; 2016 Miss. LEXIS 3; 2016 WL 82468
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CT-01793-SCT CONSOLIDATED WITH: NO. 2010-CT-00307-SCT CHERRI R. PORTER v. GRAND CASINO OF MISSISSIPPI, INC.- BILOXI, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, AND MAX MULLINS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/25/2012 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE PAUL
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003-05-21 · Published · cited 18× · 263 F. Supp. 2d 796; 57 ERC (BNA) 1743; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8475; 2003 WL 21190994
263 F.Supp.2d 796 (2003) INTERFAITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al, Defendant(s). Civil Action No. 95-2097(DMC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. May 21, 2003. *802 Robert G. Torricelli, Rosemont, NJ, Rosemont Associates, LLC, pro se. Bruce J. Terris, Kathl
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998-09-16 · Published · cited 937× · 151 F.3d 269; 1998 WL 476214
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: In this toxic tort case, we consider whether the district court abused its discretion in excluding the opinion of a physician on the causal relationship between Plaintiffs exposure to industrial chemicals and his pulmonary illness. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm. I. Bob T. Moore was employed as a delivery truck driver for Consolidated Freightw
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001-06-25 · Published · cited 5× · 176 F. Supp. 2d 599; 2001 A.M.C. 2022; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14431; 2001 WL 1429335
176 F.Supp.2d 599 (2001) In re: The Matter of CENTRAL GULF LINES, INC., and Waterman Steamship Corporation Nos. 97CV3829, 99CV1888. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. June 25, 2001. *600 *601 Robert B. Acomb, Jr., Richard D. Bertram, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre