Cases

OPINION Laura Carter Higley, Justice A jury found Appellant, Roel David Gonzalez, guilty of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child on the first offense and indecency with a child on the second. 1 Appellant elected for the jury to assess punishment, and it assessed his punishment at con

10/14/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 12, 2022 Session Heard at Austin Peay State University STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID WAYNE EADY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2018-B-952 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge __________________________

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0089p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DAVID WAYNE ALLEN, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │ │

01-15-00902-CR CHRIS DANIEL HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS October 20, 2015 HOUSTON, TEXAS

01-15-00903-CR CHRIS DANIEL 46a HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS October 20, 2015 HOUSTON, TEXAS

319 Ga. 787 FINAL COPY S24A0913. GONZALEZ v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. Jesus Olvera Gonzalez was convicted of malice murder in connection with the stabbing death of Jesus Arizaga.1 On appeal, Gonzalez contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress a statement that he made to police before he was given the warnings required by Miranda2 and that the trial court erred by failing to suppress certain DNA evidence and photographs. For the rea

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA LUIS GONZALEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN R. MATHIS et al., Defendants and Respondents. S247677 Second Appellate District, Division Seven B272344 Los Angeles County Superior Court BC542498 August 19, 20

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. *586This case requires us to consider the constitutional boundaries for the use of deception by law enforcement officers seeking consent for a warrantless search. We conclude that the search at issue here violated the Fourth Amendment because the circumstances -- including a lie that conveyed the need for urgent action to

USCA11 Case: 22-10408 Document: 62-1 Date Filed: 01/24/2024 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10408 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ACCEPTED 03-15-00462-CR 7936862 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, T

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00193-CR ___________________________ HOWARD WAYNE BAKER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1497784R Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION After hearing evid

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______ Nos. 19-1732, 20-2254, 20-2897 ______ WAYNE PRATER, Appellant in 19-1732 v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PA D.O.C.; BARRY SMITH, Superintendent at SCI Houtzdale; KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, Deputy Superintendent at SCI Houtzdale; DAVID CLOSE, Deput

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 24, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice 157487 & (89)

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS TERRENCE HARPER, § No. 08-23-00106-CR Appellant, § Appeal from the . v. § 186th Judicial District Court THE STATE OF

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1626 SANDRA RODRÍGUEZ-COTTO; RAFELLI GONZÁLEZ-COTTO, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. JENNIFFER A. GONZÁLEZ-COLÓN, Governor of Puerto Rico, in the official capacity and as representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; LOURDES L. GÓMEZ TORRES, Secretary of the Department of Justice, in the official capacity; ARTURO GARFFER,

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 11, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

NUMBER 13-00-00054-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ JAMES ANTHONY WAYNE , Appellant,

OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the following motions:- (a) Motion for Summary Judgment; the Statement of Uncontested Material Facts; and the Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by the defendant United States of America (hereinafter the “defendant” or the “Government”), Docket No. 155; (b)

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Faye Eaton, Jacqueline Si-wicki and Maureen Doyle (“plaintiffs”), bring this action against the Wayne Central School District (the “District”), its Board of Education and a number of individual school administrators, employees and Board of'Education members (collectively “defendants”), all

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra