⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “David Vincent Mollica”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997-03-20 · Published · cited 131× · 109 F.3d 354; 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2806; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5299; 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,016; 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 615; 1997 WL 125936
POSNER, Chief Judge. We have consolidated the appeals in two employment discrimination cases that raise the same two issues: Are arbitration clauses in collective bargaining agreements other than in the maritime, railroad, and other transportation industries subject to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq.1 And can a collective bargaining agreeme
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983-06-17 · Published · cited 80× · 712 F.2d 826
WEIS, Circuit Judge, Statement Sur Petition for Rehearing: Although I continue to believe that Mr. Mollica was entitled to use immunity had he chosen to testify, his willingness to forego that protection has brought about a significant change in the posture of this case. In view of the present circumstances, I vote for rehearing.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-12-27 · Published · cited 2× · 2023 Ohio 4764
[Cite as M.J. v. Akron City School Dist., 2023-Ohio-4764.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) W.H. (A MINOR), et al. C.A. Nos. 30517 M.J. (A MINOR), et al. 30518 Appellees v.
Ohio Supreme Court · 2018-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 89 N.E.3d 622; 2018 Ohio 248; 151 Ohio St. 3d 1488
This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-06-10 · Published · cited 20× · 423 U.S. App. D.C. 60; 824 F.3d 1071; 75 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1536; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10518; 2016 WL 3212995
BROWN, Circuit Judge: In the catalog of human endeavors, few activities are as fragile as flight. The air offers no mercy for mistakes and no second chances. Flight is, as Winston Churchill observed, “an extremely dangerous, jealous and exacting mistress,” demanding unfettered attention and respect. Winston S. Churchill, Thoughts and Adventures 128 (Leo Cooper pub., 1990). In th
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-06-23 · Published · cited 523× · 156 L. Ed. 2d 414; 123 S. Ct. 2402; 539 U.S. 444; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4798; 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 412; 71 U.S.L.W. 4538; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5375; 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1832
539 U.S. 444 (2003) GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORP., NKA CONSECO FINANCE CORP. v. BAZZLE ET AL., IN A REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY ON BEHALF OF A CLASS AND FOR ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL. No. 02-634. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 22, 2003. Decided June 23, 2003. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-01-15 · Published · cited 1135× · 151 L. Ed. 2d 755; 122 S. Ct. 754; 534 U.S. 279; 2002 U.S. LEXIS 489; 2002 Daily Journal DAR 485; 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1001; 70 U.S.L.W. 4081; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 369; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 63; 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,850
534 U.S. 279 (2002) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. No. 99-1823. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 10, 2001. Decided January 15, 2002. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT *281 *281 Stevens, J., deliver
District Court, E.D. New York · 2016-03-18 · Published · cited 99× · 171 F. Supp. 3d 69; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35380; 2016 WL 1089258
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Winston McLennon, Karlick Price and Stephen Augustine bring this action, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, against the City of New York, New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) Commissioner William J. Brat-ton (“Commissioner Bratton”), New York City Police Transportation Bureau (“NYCTB”) Chief Thomas Chan (“Chief
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-03-21 · Published · cited 1339× · 149 L. Ed. 2d 234; 121 S. Ct. 1302; 532 U.S. 105; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2459
532 U.S. 105 (2001) CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. v. ADAMS No. 99-1379. United States Supreme Court. Argued November 6, 2000. Decided March 21, 2001. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *107 *107 Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, i
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994-02-24 · Published · cited 6× · 844 F. Supp. 856; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2199; 1994 WL 61348
844 F.Supp. 856 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, v. John FLYNN. Crim. No. 83-00028-01-SD. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. February 24, 1994. *857 *858 *859 Arnold Huftalen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Concord, NH, for plaintiff. Robert Kirby, C
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983-07-20 · Published · cited 59× · 712 F.2d 826; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25660
712 F.2d 826 UNITED STATES of Americav.John BAZZANO, Jr. a/k/a "Johnny", a/k/a "J", Joseph De Marcoa/k/a "Joe", Joseph Charles Yimin a/k/a "Bull", CharlesPatrick Kellington a/k/a "Chuck", Francis Dattalo a/k/a"Frank", a/k/a "Hob", Attilio Policastro a/k/a "Flat Top",Primo Victor Mollica a/k/a "XG", John Franklin Matz a/k/a"Jack", a/k/a "Mayor", David Rankin Guffey a/k/a "Chief",a/k/a "Clairton Chief", John Regis Ward
Saldana v. Statepublic domain
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993-01-28 · Published · cited 102× · 846 P.2d 604; 1993 Wyo. LEXIS 26; 1993 WL 15116
URBIGKIT, Justice, Retired, dissenting. What this decision determines is that Wyoming citizens have no judicially enforced protection from the surreptitious acquisition of, and disclosure of: to whom and from whom telephone calls are made. The warrantless use of pen registers and dialed number recorders is legitimatized despite the desired privacy interests of the telephone user. This decision