Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 19-cv-0150 (DLF) v. NICHOLAS D. MUZIN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Broidy Capital Management, LLC (BCM) and Elliott Broidy (together, “Broidy”) brought thi

Case: 24-1669 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GOTV STREAMING, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NETFLIX, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2024-1669, 2024-1744 ______________________ Appeals from

SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the court are Defendant Firestone Polymers, LLC’s (“Firestone”) Motions for Summary Judgment (# s 59-66). Having considered the motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court finds that Firestone’s motions should be granted in part and denied in part.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. NEAPCO HOLDINGS LLC, NEAPCO DRIVELINES LLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2018-1763 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1

(2008) ORECK DIRECT, LLC v. DYSON, INC. Civil Action No. 07-2744. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 21, 2008. ORDER AND REASONS[1] SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Dyson, Inc.'s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because matters ou

Case: 22-2109 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 04/04/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AI VISUALIZE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., MACH7 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-2109 _____________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Andrea R. Wood, United States District Judge. Plaintiff David Izsak brings this putative class action against Defendant DraftKings, Inc. (“DraftKings”), alleging that Draft-Kings sent him an unsolicited text message in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. Izsak also asserts a claim for common law conversion. Before the Cour

ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Defendants Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Chevron Pipe Line Company, and Gulf Oil Corporation (collectively “Chevron”) move for a more definite statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) and also move to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims against them.1 Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation also moves for a more definite statem

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KONINKLIJKE KPN N.V., Plaintiff-Appellant v. GEMALTO M2M GMBH, GEMALTO INC., GEMALTO IOT LLC, TCL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LIMITED, TCL COMMUNICATION, INC., TCT MOBILE (US) HOLDINGS, INC., TCT MOBILE (US) INC., TCT MOBILE, INC., TELIT WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants-Ap

Case: 19-1506 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP., DBA SAMBA TV, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ALPHONSO INC., ASHISH CHORDIA, LAMPROS KALAMPOUKAS, RAGHU KODIGE, Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2019-1506, 2019-2133 ________________

STARK, U.S. District Judge: *646Plaintiff Koninklijke KPN N.V. ("KPN") sued multiple defendants in numerous related actions for alleged infringement of KPN's U.S. Patent No. 6,212,662 ("'662 patent"). Pending before

JUDGE MICHAEL R. BARRETT This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 105). Plaintiffs filed a Response (Docs. 114 & 132) and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. 131). I. BACKGROUND Emilie Olsen ("Emilie") was a student at Fairfield Middle School and Fairfield Intermediate School. Plaintiffs Marc and Cindy Ols

OPINION OF THE COURT Matthew A. Sciarrino, Jr., J. Twitter, Inc. (Twitter) seeks to quash the January 26, 2012 subpoena issued by the New York County District Attorney’s *870Office and upheld by this court’s April 20, 2012 order. That order required Twitter to provide any and all user information, including email addresses, as well as any and all t

MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) matter comes before the court on Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Collective Action and Dismiss Opfc-In Plaintiffs’ Claims (doc. 99). The parties have fully briefed the motion, with accompanying voluminous evidentiary submissions. The defendants, Honda M

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0151p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ KAYLA GORE; L.G.; K.N.; JAIME COMBS, │

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge. This civil action is before the Court on the following motions: defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts I, III, and IV of the Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 65],1 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Question of State Law to the Tennessee Supreme Court [Doc. 81],2 Plaintiffs’ Motion for <

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL DIRECT-PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CASES ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. All of the defendants move to dismiss the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ claims of a per se illegal horizontal conspiracy and fraudulent concealment.1 Defendants Pool Corporation, SCP Distributors LLC, and Superior Pool Products (co

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-12506 CONSOL ENERGY, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court are defendant CONSOL Energy, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Compla

OPINION AND ORDER - AIKEN, Chief Judge: Defendant Rockwell Collins, Inc. (“Rockwell”) moves for summary judgment on all'of plaintiff Tristan Justice's claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendant Naresh Agarwal (“Agarwal”) filed a separate, partial motion for summary judgement. In addition, plaintiff moves to impose sanctions. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted and plaint

652 F.Supp.2d 812 (2009) Audray LOHN, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. H-06-3690. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. August 26, 2009. *817 Howard L. Steele, Jr., Steele Sturm PLLC, Thomas H. Padgett, Jr., Raker & Patterson LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Kenne