Cases

333 S.C. 159 (1998) 508 S.E.2d 870 The STATE, Respondent, v. William David TAYLOR, Appellant. No. 24857. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard October 6, 1998. Decided November 23, 1998. Rehearing Denied January 6, 1999. *163 Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek,

OPINION GWIN, District Judge. In this case, Respondent-Warden David Trippett appeals the district court's grant of a writ of habeas corpus to Petitioner Charles Northrop pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In granting Northrop's petition, the district court found Northrop had been denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel. Although for different reasons than those relied upon by the district c

DYK, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Like the majority, I find problematic the government’s arguments here that breaking and entering and possession of burglar’s tools constitute crimes of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16. I part company with the majority when it holds that Massachusetts ABDW is not a crime of violence. This court has previously held in United States v. Hart, 674 F.3d 33, 40-4

*183 MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge On March 6, 2009, an unmarked police car collided with a motorized dirt ,bike in the Shaw neighborhood of. Northwest Washington, D.C. A Metropolitan Police Department Officer, Michael Pepperman, dr

OPINION OF THE COURT (August 31,2017) Shwartz, Circuit Judge. Elvin Wrensford and Craig Muller (“Defendants”) were convicted of federal and territorial crimes arising from a May 10, 2012 shooting in Christiansted, St. Croix. Defendants appeal the District Court’s orders denying their motions to suppress evide

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-21-00154-CR ________________ DEWAYNE LEE WALDRUP, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _________________________________________________________

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-21-00154-CR ________________ DEWAYNE LEE WALDRUP, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________________

DAVID E. RICE, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Joshua Matthews ("Matthews") was the founder of Bulk Head Brewing Company, LLC ("BHB"), a failed start-up craft brewing business. Scott and Leah Crocker invested $ 52,000 in equity interests in BHB in August and September of 2016. Scott *844Crocker ("Crocker") later guaranteed a $ 100,000 loan by Howard Ban

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: John Williams, a deputy sheriff, shot an apprehended, unarmed suspect in the back. A jury convicted him of deprivation of the suspect’s rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. § 242, and discharge of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(iii). On appeal, Williams primarily argues that the firearm conviction ca

381 F.Supp.2d 405 (2005) Raymond A. SEVER, Plaintiff v. William J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:CV-00-1271. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. August 10, 2005. *406 *407 *408 Raymond A. Sever, Forest City, PA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 22, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JULIO RAMIREZ Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2004-C-2133 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge No. M2009-01617-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 8, 2011 A Davidson County jury convicted the Defendant, Julio Ramirez, of six counts of aggrav

PIERCE, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Charles Ray Crawford appeals from his 1993 conviction for rape, raising numerous assignments of error. The record is unclear as to what caused the delay in this case being heard on appeal. For this reason, we decided to set aside the procedural bar in this matter and consider the merits of Crawford’s claimed errors. Having carefully reviewed this record,'we have concluded

-tCflA OXjfV £_At»V«s_ HO. "bCfcC'M' /RECEIVED \ PlXT^CV^ A^A/OeV - AjfelW- *. Lcx>A ko -f\^i ^oosAc-Uon) bP rfppslUrit'S A>Jk2«

322 B.R. 377 (2005) In re Carol Jean KUHN, Debtor. No. 04-62392 JPK. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. March 23, 2005. *379 George Livarchik, Law Offices of Livarchik and Farahmand, Chesterton, IN, for Debtor. *380 Daniel L. Freeland, Esq., Daniel L. Freeland &

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J. In May 1995, defendant David Cooper was convicted by a Monmouth County jury of the purposeful or knowing murder, by his own conduct, of L.G., a six-year-old girl. The jury also convicted him of the related charges of kidnapping, two counts of aggravated sexual assault, and felony murder. On the capital murder conviction, the jury sentenced defendant to death

OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice In this, interlocutory appeal, the State seeks to overturn the trial court’s pretrial order suppressing thirty-seven-statements made during recorded telephone conversations between a prison inmate and his friends and family members while the inmate’s post-conviction writ of habeas corpus attacking his capital murder conv

KING, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees Dean Kinney and David Hall brought suit against seven law enforcement officials, the seven cities or counties that employ these officials, and the East Texas Police Chiefs’ Association,1 asserting four claims: (1) a 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) claim alleging conspiracy against Kinney and Hall because of their testimony in judicial proceedings, (2) a 42 U.S.C. § 198

225 Wis.2d 159 (1999) 591 N.W.2d 823 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Roosevelt WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-1821-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument November 12, 1998. Decided April 27, 1999. *161 For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON THE DEBTOR’S MOTION TO REOPEN CHAPTER 7 CASE PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 350 [Doc. No. 92] Jeff Bohm, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction At bar is a dispute between Hollywood insiders and a Texas outsider concerning certain rights involving a blockbuster movie from 2013 entitled “The Conjuring.” In the 1982 movie entitled “The Verdict,” Paul N

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department