Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “David Scott Townsend”
Townsend v. Quadrant Corp.public domain
Alexander, J.* ¶1 We granted review of a decision of the Court of Appeals in which that court reversed the superior court’s denial of a motion by a corporate home seller and its parent companies to compel certain home purchasers to engage in arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in the purchase and sale agreement. We affirm the Court of Appeals. I ¶2 Don
United States v. David Lee Townsendpublic domain
33 F.3d 1230 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.David Lee TOWNSEND, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-4187. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Aug. 25, 1994. Wayne T. Dance, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Scott M. Matheson, Jr., U.S. Atty. and Mark K. Vincent, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., with him on the brief),
Townsend v. Moyapublic domain
*860PER CURIAM: After being cut with a knife by a prison guard, Fred Townsend (“Townsend”), an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”), filed a § 1983 suit against a guard, a prison warden, and the executive director of the TDCJ.1 The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, and Townsend appeals. Because
University of Pittsburgh v. Townsendpublic domain
542 F.3d 513 (2008) UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David TOWNSEND; Ronald Nutt; CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc.; CTI Pet Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-6062. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 9, 2008. Decided and Filed: September 9, 2008. *516 ARGUED: David G.
David Kirdassi v. Mitchell Scott White, DCpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, Athey and Callins Argued at Arlington, Virginia DAVID KIRDASSI, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0164-24-4 JUDGE DOMINIQUE A. CALLINS MARCH 25, 2025
Townsend v. Statepublic domain
632 N.E.2d 727 (1994) Scott D. TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 05S02-9404-CR-358. Supreme Court of Indiana. April 18, 1994. *729 David C. Ford, Hartford City, for appellant. Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Cynthia L. Ploughe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee. ON PETITION TO T
Townsend v. Statepublic domain
616 N.E.2d 47 (1993) Scott D. TOWNSEND, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 05A02-9206-CR-266. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District. June 29, 1993. Rehearing Denied August 9, 1993. David C. Ford, Hartford City, for appellant-defendant. Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Cynthia L. Ploughe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indi
Lucas v. Townsendpublic domain
783 F.Supp. 605 (1992) David LUCAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Judy TOWNSEND, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-166-1-MAC(WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. January 23, 1992. *606 Neil T. Bradley, Laughlin McDonald, Kathleen Wilde, ACLU, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs. Wallace Warren Plowden, Jr.,
University of Pittsburgh v. David Townsendpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0342p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH,
People v. Townsendpublic domain
182 Cal.App.4th 1151 (2010) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. REBIO TOWNSEND, Defendant and Appellant. No. B216325. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. March 15, 2010. *1153 Gerald J. Miller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attor
PER CURIAM In this complex commercial dispute, Vernco Construction, Inc., obtained a mul-ti-million dollar breach-of-contract and tort judgment against E.E. Hood & Sons, Inc., and David Nelson, individually and d/b/a Collective Contracting (collectively, the Respondents). The Respondents appealed the judgment on various grounds, but the only issue before this Court is whethe
Townsend v. Quadrant Corp.public domain
268 P.3d 917 (2012) Donia TOWNSEND and Bob Perez, individually, on behalf of their marital community, and as class representatives; Paul Ysteboe and Jo Ann Ysteboe, individually, on behalf of their marital community, and as class representatives; Vivian Lehtinen and Tony Lehtinen, individually, on behalf of their marital community, and on behalf of their minor children, Niklas and Lauren; Jon Sigafoos and Christa Sigafoos, individually, on behalf of thei
OPINION Scott K. Field, Justice CCNG Development Co., L.P. sued West Travis County Public Utility Agen *772 cy 1 and its Directors, Larry Fox, Michael Murphy, Ray Whisenant, Bill Goodwin, and Scott Roberts (collecti
Greer, David AKA David Duane Greerpublic domain
IrJfiWC SCO? UM^^ Cost/ of^jw**- ftfMU C&vt RECEIVED IN rf& #uc fa**> mmm DEN„ED COURT CF CRIMINAL APPEALS OCT 08 2015 **uosla,Clerk far* * Wfil-/Wr yjl#/2clM^7**-* ijwf4 fifivU
Reverse and Remand and Opinion Filed August 30, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00696-CV DAVID DIAZ, SCOTT FISHER, AND KRISTI FISHER, Appellants V. SMS FINANCIAL CAP, LLC, CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, STEPHEN F. PERKINS, AND CHRISTOPHER
Brennan v. Townsend & O'Leary Enterprises, Inc.public domain
Opinion FYBEL, J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Stephanie Crowley Brennan appeals from a judgment entered in favor of her former employer, Townsend & O’Leary Enterprises, Inc., and a former manager at Townsend & O’Leary Enterprises, Scott Montgomery (collectively referred to as defendants), after the trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (J
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-722 ____________ LYANTIE TOWNSEND, etc., Petitioner, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Respondent. [June 9, 2016] LEWIS, J. This case is be
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: In 1983, the petitioner, Albert Ray Beam, and Michael Shawn Scroggins were charged with the rape and murder of thirteen-year old Mondi Lenten. Each of the defendants, during the course of the proceedings, attempted to place the blame for the crime on the other, and a central issue in the case was which of the two was primarily responsible for the murd
David Wit v. United Behavioral Healthpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her cv-02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY ORDER AND ALEXANDE
David Wit v. United Behavioral Healthpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14-cv- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her 02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY OPINION ALEXANDE