⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “David Scott Townsend”

Washington Supreme Court · 2012-01-05 · Published · cited 48× · 173 Wash. 2d 451
Alexander, J.* ¶1 We granted review of a decision of the Court of Appeals in which that court reversed the superior court’s denial of a motion by a corporate home seller and its parent companies to compel certain home purchasers to engage in arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in the purchase and sale agreement. We affirm the Court of Appeals. I ¶2 Don
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994-08-25 · Published · cited 34× · 33 F.3d 1230; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23254; 1994 WL 460837
33 F.3d 1230 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.David Lee TOWNSEND, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-4187. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Aug. 25, 1994. Wayne T. Dance, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Scott M. Matheson, Jr., U.S. Atty. and Mark K. Vincent, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., with him on the brief),
Townsend v. Moyapublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002-06-05 · Published · cited 63× · 291 F.3d 859; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10710; 2002 WL 1012670
*860PER CURIAM: After being cut with a knife by a prison guard, Fred Townsend (“Townsend”), an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”), filed a § 1983 suit against a guard, a prison warden, and the executive director of the TDCJ.1 The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, and Townsend appeals. Because
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-09-09 · Published · cited 12× · 542 F.3d 513; 28 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 218; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19171; 2008 WL 4133937
542 F.3d 513 (2008) UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David TOWNSEND; Ronald Nutt; CTI Molecular Imaging, Inc.; CTI Pet Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-6062. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 9, 2008. Decided and Filed: September 9, 2008. *516 ARGUED: David G.
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2025-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Beales, Athey and Callins Argued at Arlington, Virginia DAVID KIRDASSI, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 0164-24-4 JUDGE DOMINIQUE A. CALLINS MARCH 25, 2025
Townsend v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Supreme Court · 1994-04-18 · Published · cited 106× · 632 N.E.2d 727; 1994 Ind. LEXIS 47; 1994 WL 133082
632 N.E.2d 727 (1994) Scott D. TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 05S02-9404-CR-358. Supreme Court of Indiana. April 18, 1994. *729 David C. Ford, Hartford City, for appellant. Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Cynthia L. Ploughe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee. ON PETITION TO T
Townsend v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993-06-29 · Published · cited 4× · 616 N.E.2d 47; 1993 Ind. App. LEXIS 712; 1993 WL 227740
616 N.E.2d 47 (1993) Scott D. TOWNSEND, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 05A02-9206-CR-266. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District. June 29, 1993. Rehearing Denied August 9, 1993. David C. Ford, Hartford City, for appellant-defendant. Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Cynthia L. Ploughe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indi
Lucas v. Townsendpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1992-01-23 · Published · cited 7× · 783 F. Supp. 605; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 653; 1992 WL 11069
783 F.Supp. 605 (1992) David LUCAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Judy TOWNSEND, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-166-1-MAC(WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. January 23, 1992. *606 Neil T. Bradley, Laughlin McDonald, Kathleen Wilde, ACLU, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs. Wallace Warren Plowden, Jr.,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0342p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH,
People v. Townsendpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2010-03-15 · Published · cited 2× · 182 Cal. App. 4th 1151; 106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 454; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 338
182 Cal.App.4th 1151 (2010) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. REBIO TOWNSEND, Defendant and Appellant. No. B216325. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. March 15, 2010. *1153 Gerald J. Miller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attor
Texas Supreme Court · 2015-04-24 · Published · cited 78× · 460 S.W.3d 145; 58 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 700; 2015 Tex. LEXIS 352; 2015 WL 1869932
PER CURIAM In this complex commercial dispute, Vernco Construction, Inc., obtained a mul-ti-million dollar breach-of-contract and tort judgment against E.E. Hood & Sons, Inc., and David Nelson, individually and d/b/a Collective Contracting (collectively, the Respondents). The Respondents appealed the judgment on various grounds, but the only issue before this Court is whethe
Washington Supreme Court · 2012-01-05 · Published · cited 51× · 268 P.3d 917
268 P.3d 917 (2012) Donia TOWNSEND and Bob Perez, individually, on behalf of their marital community, and as class representatives; Paul Ysteboe and Jo Ann Ysteboe, individually, on behalf of their marital community, and as class representatives; Vivian Lehtinen and Tony Lehtinen, individually, on behalf of their marital community, and on behalf of their minor children, Niklas and Lauren; Jon Sigafoos and Christa Sigafoos, individually, on behalf of thei
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-01-04 · Published · cited 10× · 514 S.W.3d 770; 2017 WL 74420; 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 14
OPINION Scott K. Field, Justice CCNG Development Co., L.P. sued West Travis County Public Utility Agen *772 cy 1 and its Directors, Larry Fox, Michael Murphy, Ray Whisenant, Bill Goodwin, and Scott Roberts (collecti
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
IrJfiWC SCO? UM^^ Cost/ of^jw**- ftfMU C&vt RECEIVED IN rf& #uc fa**> mmm DEN„ED COURT CF CRIMINAL APPEALS OCT 08 2015 **uosla,Clerk far* * Wfil-/Wr yjl#/2clM^7**-* ijwf4 fifivU
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
Reverse and Remand and Opinion Filed August 30, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00696-CV DAVID DIAZ, SCOTT FISHER, AND KRISTI FISHER, Appellants V. SMS FINANCIAL CAP, LLC, CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, STEPHEN F. PERKINS, AND CHRISTOPHER
California Court of Appeal · 2011-10-18 · Published · cited 23× · 199 Cal. App. 4th 1336; 132 Cal. Rptr. 3d 292; 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1309; 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1006
Opinion FYBEL, J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Stephanie Crowley Brennan appeals from a judgment entered in favor of her former employer, Townsend & O’Leary Enterprises, Inc., and a former manager at Townsend & O’Leary Enterprises, Scott Montgomery (collectively referred to as defendants), after the trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (J
Supreme Court of Florida · 2016-06-09 · Published · cited 2× · 192 So. 3d 1223; 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 269; 2016 WL 3191105; 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1195; 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 269
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-722 ____________ LYANTIE TOWNSEND, etc., Petitioner, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Respondent. [June 9, 2016] LEWIS, J. This case is be
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993-12-07 · Published · cited 84× · 3 F.3d 1301
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: In 1983, the petitioner, Albert Ray Beam, and Michael Shawn Scroggins were charged with the rape and murder of thirteen-year old Mondi Lenten. Each of the defendants, during the course of the proceedings, attempted to place the blame for the crime on the other, and a central issue in the case was which of the two was primarily responsible for the murd
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her cv-02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY ORDER AND ALEXANDE
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14-cv- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her 02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY OPINION ALEXANDE