⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “David Rubalcaba and Sandra Rubalcaba”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020-04-07 · Published · cited 22× · 955 F.3d 238
18-3650 United States v. Adams United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2019 Argued: October 10, 2019 Decided: April 7, 2020 No. 18-3650 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
District Court, D. Arizona · 1996-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 934 F. Supp. 335; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9407; 1996 WL 421441
ORDER MUECKE, District Judge. Having considered defendants Student Education Loan Marketing Corporation’s [SEL-MAC] and Arizona Educational Loan Marketing Corporation’s [AELMAC] motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court concludes as follows: Background Plaintiffs allege in their third amended complaint that in reliance on misrepresentations by
District Court, D. Arizona · 1996-05-17 · Published · cited 1× · 934 F. Supp. 335
934 F.Supp. 335 (1996) Sandra CRAWFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL CAREERS, INC., et al., Defendants. Vickie LEE, Plaintiff v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Security Savings and Loan Association, et al., Defendants. Sandra CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in Its Capacity as Receiver for Merabank, et al., Defendants. Colleen ROSE, Pl
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-03-24 · Published · cited 13× · 517 S.W.3d 320; 2017 WL 1130399; 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 2550
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti