Cases

754 F.Supp.2d 794 (2010) William David BOWDEN, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF CARY, Defendant. No. 5:09-CV-504-FL. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. December 7, 2010. *796 Katherine Lewis Parker, American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina, Mark R. Sigmon, Graebe Hanna & Welborn, PLLC, Raleigh,

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge COGBURN joined. OPINION DIAZ, Circuit Judge: The Town of Cary, North Carolina (the “Town”), appeals the district court’s invalidation of its municipal sign ordinance as it applied to resident William David Bowden (“Bowden”). Th

PD-0445-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS October 28, 2015 Transmitted 10/26/2015 3:17:19 PM No. PD-0445-15 Accepted 10/28/2015 1:27:35 PM ____

PD-0445-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS No. PD-0445-15 August 18, 2015 Transmitted 8/17/2015 3:41:32 PM Accepted 8/18

Order entered November 4, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01010-CR DAVID CARY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0445-15 DAVID FREDERICK CARY, Appellant* v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS COLLIN COUNTY H ERVEY, J., delivered the opinion

PD-0445-15 PD-0445-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS No. PD-_______ Transmitted 4/21/2015 11:12:35 AM Accepted 4/21/2015 3:06:59 PM

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge DIAZ joined. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: Alfredo Rolando Prieto appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He contends that the Eighth Amendment prohibition on the execution of intellectuall

SYKES, Circuit Judge. Trachte Building Systems, Inc., a Wisconsin manufacturer, established an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) in the mid-1980s when ESOPs were a popular employee-benefits instrument. In the late 1990s, David Fenkell and Alliance Holdings, Inc., a company he founded and controlled, developed a niche specialty in buying and selling ESOP-owned, closely held

OPINION KENNY ARMSTRONG, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which J. STEVEN STAFFORD, P.J., W.S., and THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., joined. This is a health care liability action, arising from the death of Decedent, David Hamilton. • Decedent’s surviving spouse, Donna Hamilton (Appellant), filed th

Opinion issued January 15, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

MARTIN, Judge. On 20 March 1987 plaintiff agreed to convey approximately 155 acres of unimproved real property to defendant partnership SRW/Cary Associates in exchange for ten parcels of improved real property, $50,000 in cash, and an unsecured promissory note in the principal sum of $100,000. The promissory note provided on its face that it was given for the balance of the purchase price of a parcel of real property and was

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge. After being found guilty by a jury of various offenses arising out of their involvement in an extensive securities fraud scheme, defendants-appellants Jeffrey Szur, Elaine Szur, Cary Weinstein, and Vadim Kaplun appeal from the judgments of conviction entered against them by the United States District Court for'the Southern District of New York (Jo

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAVID F. EVANS; COLLIN FINNERTY;  READE SELIGMANN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STEVEN W. CHALMERS; BEVERLY COUNCIL; RONALD HODGE; JEFF LAMB; MICHAEL RIPBERGER; LEE RUSS; PATRICK BAKER, Defendants-Appellants,  No. 11-1436 and CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA; MARK GOTTLIEB; BENJAMIN HIMAN; DAVID ADDISON; MICHAEL NIFONG; LINWOOD WIL

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI C. DAVID ROUNER AND ) ALISHA HUDSON, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) No. SC93679 ) CARI RENEE WISE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ) AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE K. R. CONKLIN ) LIVING TRUST, AND CARLI NICOLE ) CONKLIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ) CO-TRU

389 S.E.2d 143 (1990) 97 N.C. App. 484 TOWN OF CARY, Plaintiff, v. Myrtle O. STALLINGS, Defendant, v. VIC REALTY. No. 8910DC404. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 6, 1990. *144 Dan Lynn, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee. Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis, P.A. by David R. Shearon an

ORDER The opinion filed on June 6, 2007, is hereby amended as follows. In the slip opinion at page 6818, paragraph [4], lines 6-9, the sentence beginning “Any violation ....” is replaced with “Any violation here is more properly asserted by NAMBLA through a Bivens action, in which it could better develop any facts about the burden on its rights. See Bivens

PD-1341-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS August 4, 2015 Transmitted 7/30/2015 10:46:42 AM

PD-1341-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS July 6, 2015 Transmitted 7/6/2015 3:28:21 PM Accepted 7/6/2015 4:04:17 PM No. PD-1341-14

OPINION Hon. Peter G. Cary, United States Bankruptcy Court This case raises the question of whether filing of a proof of claim based upon a time-barred debt violates the Federal and Maine Fair Debt Collection Practices Acts and the Bankruptcy Code.1 The issue is before me on defendants LVNV Funding, LLC and Resurgent Capital Services’ motion to dismiss the complaint of plainti