Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

ORDER AND JUDGMENT ** PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from a diversity action brought under Colorado state law by the owners of 26 Colorado homes (“Homeowners”) against Defendant-Appellant Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (“Goodyear”). After a jury trial, some, but not all, Homeo

715 So.2d 207 (1997) Ex parte STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (Re Aubrey Wayne TIDMORE, et al. v. STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.). STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Betty J. PAYNE, et al. Aubrey Wayne TIDMORE, et al. v. Betty J. PAYNE, et al. 1960410, 1960455 and 1960589. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 16, 1997.

OSCN Found Document:OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA2023 OK 60Case Number: 120376Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 60, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA2023 OK 60Case Number: 120376Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 60, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA2023 OK 60Case Number: 120376Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 60, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

YOUNG, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). This case poses a deceptively simple question: where, if anywhere, can a member of the public walk on the private beach of one of our Great Lakes without trespassing on a lakefront (littoral) owner’s property? Although the question is simple, the answer, as amply demon

977 P.2d 1218 (1999) 1999 UT App 119 David WINTERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Joanne SCHULMAN and Allison Abizaid, Defendants and Appellee. No. 980242-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. April 15, 1999. *1220 W. Kevin Jackson, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. David C. Wright and Ellen Maycock, Salt Lake C

Juan R. Sánchez, District Judge. This case involves a dispute between neighboring property owners: a shopping mall and a railroad. Plaintiff MD Mall Associates, LLC, t/a MacDade Mall Associates, L.P., owns and operates the MacDade Mall, a shopping center located on property adjacent to and downhill from a railroad track and right-of-way owned and operated by Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. During heavier rains, storm water pools

662 F.Supp.2d 441 (2009) Robert A. LATHAM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Bill MATTHEWS, Pamela M. Bunes, Robert C. Scherne, Kevin F. Pickard, Lowell T. Harmison, Marvin H. Fink, and Signalife, Inc., Defendants. Darryl K. Roth, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. William R. Matthews, Pamela M. Bunes, Robert C. Scherne, Kevin F., Pickard, Lowell T. Harmi

310 F.Supp.2d 1359 (2004) In re JANUS MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT LITIGATION In re Strong Mutual Funds Investment Litigation In re Bank One Mutual Funds Investment Litigation In re Bank Of America Mutual Funds Investment Litigation In re Mutual Funds Investment Litigation In re Putnam Mutual Funds Investment Litigation In re Alliance Capital Mutual Funds Investment Litigation No. MDL-1576, 1577, 1582, 1585, 1586,

828 P.2d 213 (1992) In re REAPPORTIONMENT OF the COLORADO GENERAL ASSEMBLY. No. 92SA19. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. March 30, 1992. *214 Holme, Roberts & Owen, Daniel S. Hoffman, Daniel J. Dunn, Stephen P. Ward, Colorado Reapportionment Com'n, Rebecca C. Lennahan, Denver, for Colorado Reapportionment Com'n. Charles H.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0193p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CHARLES M. ANDREWS, SR., Trustee of the Gloria M. │ Andrews Trust Da

LASH, J, — This court held a custody trial on October 11, 16 and 25, 2006. At issue is primary custody of the parties’ minor child, Lauren Vollrath, born June 7, 1999. The court makes the following findings of fact: I. FINDINGS OF FACT (1) Plaintiff, Paul D. Vollrath (Father), is an adult individual who currently resides at 982 Garfield Court, Warrington, Bucks County, Pennsylvania

PER CURIAM. Ralston Davis was charged by indictment in Broward County with three counts of first-degree murder arising from the December 2, 2005 shooting deaths of Myo-sha Proby, Ravindra Basdeo, and Carlos Jones. Davis entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. The jury rejected Davis’s insanity defense and convicted him of each count of first-degree murder. At the end of the penalty phase, the jury recommended lif

545 U.S. 913 (2005) METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC. ET AL. v. GROKSTER, LTD., ET AL. No. 04-480. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 29, 2005. Decided June 27, 2005. *916 Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs for the motion picture studio and recording

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13865 EMERALD NECKLACE CONSERVANCY, INC., & others1 vs. CITY

09-0994-cv (Lead) Ognibene, et al. v. Parkes, et al. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 October Term 2010 4 (Argued: October 18, 2010 Decided: December 21, 2011) 5 Docket Nos. 09-0994-cv (Lead) 09-1432-cv (Con) 6 _____________________________________ 7 TOM OG

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BABCOCK, District Judge. In this action to quiet title to Lewis Creek Road in the County of La Plata, Colorado, plaintiff Ruth Barker (“Mrs. Barker”) moves for partial summary judgment regarding the legal effect of Resolution 1976-84, adopted in 1976 by defendant Board of County Commissioners of the County of La Plata, Colorado (“the County”). Mrs. Barker also moves for par