Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. In this appeal, we are asked to review the propriety of a decision by the Board of *719School Directors of the Albert Gallatin Area School District (hereinafter the Board) to provide free transportation to kindergarten-age children on only a one-way basis either to or from school. The d

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER SIMMONS, District Judge. Findings of Fact The Plaintiff, having filed its Complaint herein on August 7,1980, alleging violations of the Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and seeking declaratory and injunctive reli

ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the “Recommendation”) [Docket No. 163] issued on July 15, 2014. .The magistrate judge recommends that the Court grant the Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 146] filed by defendants William Klenke and Dolores Montoya. Plaintiff Matthew Ryan Sherman filed time

522 F.Supp. 1138 (1981) Elizabeth P. SHAFFER, William W. Shaffer, Daniel Everett Brangard, Aura Virginia Engle, Gary N. Cottrell, Susan Rae Moore, minors by their guardians, Betty J. Shaffer, Wanda R. Brangard, Pauline V. Layhew, Dolores Cottrell and Diana J. Moore, and in their own right, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS OF the ALBERT GALLATIN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Dorsey Clegg, Theodore Yankowski, Sarah Bartuch, Elroy Enlow, Charles Kin

687 F.2d 718 6 Ed. Law Rep. 487 Elizabeth P. SHAFFER, William W. Shaffer, Daniel EverettBrangard, Audra Virginia Engle, Gary N. Cottrell, Susan RaeMoore, minors by their guardians Betty J. Shaffer, Wanda R.Brangard, Pauline V. Layhue, Dolores Cottrell and Diana J.Moore, and in their own right, Appellees,v.BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS OF the ALBERT GALLATIN AREA SCHOOLDISTRICT, Dorsey Clegg, Theo

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, Magistrate Judge The question presented by this case is a recurring one in litigation between insurance companies and their insureds: to what extent documents generated in connection with a “coverage review”- — a phrase with an elastic definition — by a lawyer hired by the carrier, are insulated from disclosure in discovery by virtue of the attorney/client privilege

93 B.R. 1014 (1988) In re FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., et al., Debtor(s). Bankruptcy No. 86 B 8021 E. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado. December 12, 1988. *1015 Carl A. Eklund, John E. Maas, Faegre & Benson, Denver, Colo., for debtors. Bruce R. Zirinsky, Brian S. Rosen, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, for Con

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

63 Cal.Rptr.3d 433 (2007) 163 P.3d 118 41 Cal.4th 1277 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Maria Del Rosio ALFARO, Defendant and Appellant. No. S027730. Supreme Court of California. August 6, 2007. Rehearing Denied October 24, 2007. Certiorari Denied March 3, 2008. See 128 S.

388 B.R. 705 (2008) In re Jamy Monte VARONA, Jr., Danielle Demetrius Varona, Debtors. No. 07-71761-SCS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. May 22, 2008. *707 Thomas B. Dickenson, Norfolk, VA, for Debtors. Kenneth N. Whitehurst, III, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Norfolk, VA, for U.S. Trustee.

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams