⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “David N. Golphin”

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-05-08 · Published · cited 57× · 161 A.3d 1009; 2017 Pa. Super. 137; 2017 WL 1855156; 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 330
OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County following Appellant’s conviction by a jury on the charges of third-degree murder, conspiracy, aggravated assault, and endangering the welfare of a child.(“EWOC”). 1
Golphin v. Brankerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008-03-07 · Published · cited 24× · 519 F.3d 168; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 5033; 2008 WL 615073
519 F.3d 168 (2008) Tilmon C. GOLPHIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gerald J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee. No. 07-8. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: December 4, 2007. Decided: March 7, 2008. *169 *170 ARGUED
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2006-11-09 · Published · cited 0×
Criminal Case Template COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MARTIN GOLPHIN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. §
State v. Golphinpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000-08-25 · Published · cited 301× · 533 S.E.2d 168; 352 N.C. 364; 2000 N.C. LEXIS 618
533 S.E.2d 168 (2000) 352 N.C. 364 STATE of North Carolina v. Kevin Salvador GOLPHIN. State of North Carolina v. Tilmon Charles Golphin, Jr. No. 441A98. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 25, 2000. *183 Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by William B. Crumpler and Robert C. Montgomery, A
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017-04-27 · Published · cited 70× · 855 F.3d 278; 2017 WL 1506327
AGEE, Circuit Judge: After being sentenced to death upon first-degree murder convictions, Marcus Robinson and Tilmon Golphin (collectively, “Petitioners”) sought post-conviction relief in state court pursuant to North Carolina’s Racial Justice Act (“RJA”), N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 15A-2010 to 2012 (2009) (repealed 2018). Following separate evidentiary hearings, the North Carolina trial
State v. Simspublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018-08-07 · Published · cited 6× · 818 S.E.2d 401; 260 N.C. App. 665
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-45 Filed: 7 August 2018 Onslow County, Nos. 01 CRS 2993–95 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANTWAUN SIMS Appeal by defendant from order entered 21 March 2014 by Judge Jack W. Jenkins in Onslow County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 17 October 2017. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney General K
State v. Vidovichpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 798 S.E.2d 813; 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 334; 2017 WL 1632640
McGEE, Chief Judge. This matter involves the alleged commission of indecent liberties against a child, C.C.1 C.C.'s grandmother ("Grandmother") testified she and her mother took C.C. to Big Lots ("the store") around noon on 9 June 2014, to celebrate C.C.'s fourteenth birthday. Grandmother testified a man she later came to learn was Kelly Joe Vidovich ("Defendant") followed them into the store from the pa
State v. Simspublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2025-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 297PA18 Filed 21 March 2025 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANTWAUN KYRAL SIMS On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 260 N.C. App. 665 (2018), finding no error after an appeal from an order entered on 21 March 2014 by Judge Jack W. Jenkins in Superior Court, Onslow County. Heard in the S
Ohio Supreme Court · 2020-01-14 · Published · cited 29× · 159 Ohio St. 3d 106; 148 N.E.3d 542; 2020 Ohio 61
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Smith v. May, Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-61.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or oth
State v. Robersonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 Ohio 3162
[Cite as State v. Roberson, 2021-Ohio-3162.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-12-24 · Published · cited 40× · 813 F.3d 770; 2015 WL 9461515
IKUTA, Circuit Judge, joined by TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, concurring: I write separately to address a question raised by the majority: whether Miller-El v. Dretke (Miller-El II), 545 U.S. 231, 125 S.Ct. 2317, 162 L.Ed.2d 196 (2005), established a new procedural rule that a state court must use comparative juror analysis when adjudicating a Batson claim, such that a failure to d
State v. Lenoirpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018-06-05 · Published · cited 1× · 816 S.E.2d 880; 259 N.C. App. 857
DAVIS, Judge. *858 In this appeal, we revisit the issue of how much factual information a law enforcement officer's affidavit must contain in order to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant. Because we conclude that the affidavit at issue in this case lacked sufficient
State v. Tuckerpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2023-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 113A96-4 Filed 15 December 2023 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RUSSELL WILLIAM TUCKER On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order entered 24 August 2020 by Judge R. Stuart Albright in Superior Court, Forsyth County, denying defendant’s motions for appropriate relief. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 February 2023. Josh
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 48 So. 3d 421; 2010 La.App. 1 Cir. 0077; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 1588; 2010 WL 4263709
PER CURIAM. | ¡.Relator, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), filed this writ application seeking supervisory review of the district court’s judgment denying its motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we grant the writ and reverse the district court’s judgment. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The plaintiff, David R. Bordelon, Jr., filed suit seek
State v. Diehlpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2001-05-04 · Published · cited 13× · 545 S.E.2d 185; 353 N.C. 433; 2001 N.C. LEXIS 430
EDMUNDS, Justice. On 16 January 1996, defendant David Charles Diehl was indicted for first-degree murder. The case was tried capitally. The jury found defendant guilty of first-degree murder on the basis of premeditation and deliberation. After a capital sentencing proceeding, the jury recommended life imprisonment without parole, and on 10 March 1998, the court imposed sentence accordingly. In a split decision, the Court of
State v. Alstonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014-04-01 · Published · cited 1× · 233 N.C. App. 152; 756 S.E.2d 70; 2014 WL 1366031; 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 304
GEER, Judge. Defendant Kenneth Eugene Alston appeals from his conviction of robbery with a dangerous weapon. On appeal, defendant primarily contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”) when his trial counsel failed to object to the joinder for trial of defendant’s charges of robbery with a dangerous weapon and possession of a firearm by a felon. Defendant
Ohio Supreme Court · 2018-06-05 · Published · cited 14× · 2018 Ohio 2120; 116 N.E.3d 91; 154 Ohio St. 3d 476
Per Curiam. *476 {¶ 1} These two appeals, which we consolidate for decision, arise out of the same underlying facts. In case No. 2016-1284, appellant, Robert L. Johnson, appeals the judgment of the Eleventh District Court of Appeals dismissing his petition for a writ
State v. Martinpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2004-10-27 · Published · cited 279× · 103 Ohio St. 3d 385; 816 N.E.2d 227
Moyer, C.J., concurring in judgment only. {¶ 46} I concur in the judgment rendered by the majority but write separately for the reasons that follow. I agree with the majority that the trial court did not make a sufficient inquiry to determine whether Martin fully understood and intelligently relinquished his right to counsel as required by both the federal and Ohio Constitutions and Crim.R. 44(A). I do not a
State v. Shepherdpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003-02-04 · Published · cited 5× · 575 S.E.2d 776; 156 N.C. App. 69; 2003 N.C. App. LEXIS 31
575 S.E.2d 776 (2003) STATE of North Carolina v. Maurice SHEPHERD. No. COA02-219. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 4, 2003. *777 Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Celia Grasty Lata, for the State. Belser & Parke, P.A., by David G. Belser, Asheville, for defendant-appellant. B
State v. Holmespublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002-06-28 · Published · cited 22× · 565 S.E.2d 154; 355 N.C. 719; 2002 N.C. LEXIS 549
Defendant Mitchell David Holmes was indicted on 15 February 1999 for the first-degree murder of Dean Ray Creech, the attempted first-degree murder of Ronnie Lynn Hardison, and robbery with a dangerous weapon. Defendant was tried capitally and found guilty of first-degree murder on the basis of premeditation and deliberation and under the felony murder rule. He was also found guilty of attempted first-degree murder and of robbery with a firearm. Following a capital sentencing proceedin