Cases

Ruffin, Chief Judge. Bay Meadow Corporation sued Orean Hart for specific performance of a contract provision regarding a right of first refusal to purchase land.1 By order dated November 8, 2001, the trial court found that the contract provision was unenforceable. Over a year later, Bay Meadow purported to amend its complaint. Following a hearing, the trial court clarified that its November 2001 or

989 A.2d 602 (2010) 295 Conn. 907 418 MEADOW STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC v. ONE SOLUTION SERVICES, LLC. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided February 25, 2010. David Eric Ross, Westport, in support of the petition. William J. Kupinse, Jr., Bridgeport, and Andrew M. McPherson, in opposition. The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from

1 A.3d 1194 (2010) 123 Conn.App. 416 418 MEADOW STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC v. CLEAN AIR PARTNERS, LLC. No. 30719. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued May 18, 2010. Decided August 24, 2010. *1195 Andrew M. McPherson, with whom, on the brief, was William J. Kupinse, Jr., for the appellant (pl

15 A.3d 1140 (2011) 127 Conn.App. 711 418 MEADOW STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC v. ONE SOLUTION SERVICES, LLC. No. 31974. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 6, 2011. Decided April 5, 2011. *1141 David R. Gronbach, for the appellant (defendant). *114

980 A.2d 345 (2009) 117 Conn.App. 651 418 MEADOW STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC v. ONE SOLUTION SERVICES, LLC. No. 29856. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 3, 2009. Decided October 20, 2009. David Eric Ross, Westport, for the appellant (defendant). Andrew M. McPherson, with whom, on the brief, was William J. Kup

RUSSON, Justice, concurring in the result: ¶ 17 I concur in the result. I believe our decision in Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc., 2000 UT 2, 993 P.2d 207, renders it unnecessary to address the arguments concerning the continuing jurisdiction of the Commission. According to our plurality opinion in Vigos, the Commission acquires jurisdiction as soon as an injured worker files a prope

560 N.W.2d 588 (1997) Alicia ALVAREZ and Gabriel Alvarez, Individually and as the Next Friend of Gabriel Alvarez, Jr., Alma Alvarez, Adriana Alvarez, and Diana Alvarez, Their Minor Children, Appellants, v. MEADOW LANE MALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Spatz Partners, and William Spatz and David Spatz, Individually and as Partners, Appellees. No. 95-2210. Supreme Court of Iowa. March 26

Meadow E. Assoc. LP v Village of Potsdam (2022 NY Slip Op 07274) Meadow E. Assoc. LP v Village of Potsdam 2022 NY Slip Op 07274 Decided on December 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure

Boggs, Judge. These appeals arise out of a failed real estate venture and the resulting protracted litigation between numerous parties, including the filing of a lis pendens. In this separate claim by an assignee against the law firm that filed the lis pendens, we conclude that the trial court correctly found preemption under the exclusivity provision of the abusive litigation statute, OCGA § 51-7-85, because the lawsuit seeks

PER CURIAM: The defendants were convicted for carrying on the business of distillers of spirituous liquors without having given the required bond under 26 U.S.C. §§ 5173, 5601(a). 1 The court below is charged with error in failing to grant a pre-trial motion to suppress

Opinion DRANGINIS, J. The plaintiffs, James R. Lombard and Lombard Associates, Inc., appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant Meadows Condominium of Middletown Association, Inc.1 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary jud

10/22/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 15, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. NATHANIEL DAVID LABRECQUE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2017-B-1443 Amanda McClendon, Judge No. M2018-01587-CCA-R3-CD The Defendan

29 B.R. 615 (1983) In re SPRING MEADOW TROUT HATCHERY, INC., Debtor. In re Howard DIEHL, Jr. and Leslie J. Diehl, Individually and Jointly as Husband and Wife, Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 81-00427, 81-00428. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 27, 1983. *616 Allan B. Goodman, Bethlehem, Pa., for debtors. Kare

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-795 No. COA21-688 Filed 6 December 2022 Brunswick County, No. 18 CRS 681 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID RAEFORD TRIPP, JR. Appeal by Defendant from order entered 28 June 2021 by Judge Jason C. Disbrow in Brunswick County Superior Court. Heard in the Court o

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED January 25, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK Jay Folse, SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Petiti

10/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 4, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID HERL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 12-27 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

Judgment rendered April 9, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,200-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA Appelle

NO. 07-09-00190-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B ----------------------------------------------------

NO. 07-09-00190-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B APRIL 27, 2010 CADLES OF GRASSY MEADOW, II, LLC AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO PEOPLES BANK & TRUST, APPELLANT v.

Panagoulopoulos v Carlos Ortiz Jr. MD, P.C. (2021 NY Slip Op 02807) Panagoulopoulos v Carlos Ortiz Jr. MD, P.C. 2021 NY Slip Op 02807 Decided on May 5, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York St