⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “David M. Russell”

Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2023-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 TN WC 65
FILED Sep 18, 2023 11:02 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992-06-09 · Published · cited 22× · 961 F.2d 1380
*1381 McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Michael W. Beshore and David M. Russell (defendants) appeal from final judgments entered in the United States District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri, upon a jury verdict, finding them guilty of on
State v. Russellpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 136 S.W.3d 904; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 958; 2004 WL 1439940
ORDER David M. Russell appeals the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Russell v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014-06-04 · Published · cited 6× · 2014 Ark. App. 357
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 357 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-13-1022 ROY LEE RUSSELL Opinion Delivered June 4, 2014 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DESHA V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Russell v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 880
PER CURIAM. *881In this Anders1 appeal, William E. Russell, Jr., appeals the judgment and sentence entered after he pled, with the assistance of counsel, no contest to burglary of a dwelling. Although we affirm, one issue merits discussion. Russell did not expressly reserve the right to appeal the denial of
Russell v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 880
PER CURIAM. *881In this Anders1 appeal, William E. Russell, Jr., appeals the judgment and sentence entered after he pled, with the assistance of counsel, no contest to burglary of a dwelling. Although we affirm, one issue merits discussion. Russell did not expressly reserve the right to appeal the denial of
Russell v. Russellpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009-01-16 · Published · cited 1× · 19 So. 3d 886; 2009 Ala. LEXIS 20; 2009 WL 129972
COBB, Chief Justice. This Court granted David Wade Russell’s petition for a writ of certiorari to determine whether the Court of Civil Appeals properly reversed the judgment of the trial court awarding Russell primary custody of the parties’ minor child. See Russell v. Russell, 19 So.3d 879 (Ala.Civ.App.2008). The Court of Civil Appeals included in its opinion a detailed discussion of the facts o
Jackelen v. Russellpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015-11-24 · Published · cited 2× · 366 Wis. 2d 255; 2015 WI App 93; 873 N.W.2d 265
CURLEY, P.J. ¶ 1. The Hertz Corporation (Hertz), Hope L. Russell, and Artisan and Truckers Casualty Company (Artisan) (collectively, "the appealing parties") appeal the trial court's ruling and entry of final judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company *260(Allstate) on Allstate's motion for declaratory and summary judgment seeking a determination that there is no ins
Russell v. McGrathpublic domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015-09-25 · Published · cited 1× · 135 F. Supp. 3d 427; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129065; 2015 WL 5671542
ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, JR., District Judge. I. Introduction This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs decedents, Kelsey Harris, Melinda Sue Pipp, and Billings S. Fuess, IV, were killed in an automobile accident in Columbia, South Carolina on January 18, 2012. Plaintiffs seek to recover underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage fro
Russell v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2011-04-07 · Published · cited 66× · 341 S.W.3d 526; 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2638; 2011 WL 1331866
341 S.W.3d 526 (2011) David Allen RUSSELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. Nos. 02-10-00161-CR, 02-10-00162-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. April 7, 2011. *527 Wade Tyler "W. Ty" Wilson, Fort Worth, TX, for Appellant. Joe Shannon, Jr., Criminal District Attorney; Charles M. Mallin, Chief of the Appellat
State v. Russellpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 265 Or. App. 381; 335 P.3d 337; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1223
SERCOMBE, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained after the car he was riding in was stopped by a police officer. Defendant contends that that evidence should be suppressed, raising two arguments. He first argues that the evidence was obtained after an unlawful extension of a traffic
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993-07-20 · Published · cited 0× · 14 F.3d 610; 1993 WL 535801
14 F.3d 610 Russell (David M.)v.U.S. NO. 93-2535United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. July 20, 1993 1 Appeal From: W.D.Mo. 2 AFFIRMED. <
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992-12-15 · Published · cited 0× · 995 F.2d 228; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 38045; 1992 WL 475897
995 F.2d 228 Russell (David M.)v.U.S. NO. 92-3628 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Dec 15, 1992 1 Appeal From: W.D.Mo. 2 AFFIRMED.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-07-27 · Published · cited 36× · 194 A.3d 139
OPINION BY KUNSELMAN, J.: Adam K. Kapcsos moved for en banc reargument of Malisha J. Benshoff's appeal in this partition action. We granted his motion. However, during our deliberations of the issues that Ms. Benshoff raised on appeal, we discovered a significant procedural error by the parties in the trial court. Because this procedural error is fatal to our appella
Indiana Supreme Court · 2016-03-22 · Published · cited 7× · 51 N.E.3d 136; 2016 Ind. LEXIS 209; 2016 WL 1117691
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Gregory F. Zoeller Clay M. Patton Attorney General Osan & Patton LLP Valparaiso, Indiana Stephen R. Creason Chief Counsel FILED Mar 22 2016, 10:35 am K
In Re Russellpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010-06-30 · Published · cited 18× · 458 B.R. 731; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 2175; 2010 WL 2671496
458 B.R. 731 (2010) In re William F. RUSSELL, Jr., Debtor. No. 10-11720-SSM. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. June 30, 2010. *732 Daniel M. Press, Esquire, Chung & Press, P.C., McLean, VA, for Debtor. William F. Russell, Jr., Fredericksburg, VA, pro se. Eric David White, Esquire, Samue
Indiana Supreme Court · 2013-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 993 N.E.2d 157; 2013 WL 4552535; 2013 Ind. LEXIS 636
RUCKER, Justice. Although a defendant who pleads guilty to driving while suspended as a habitual traffic violator may not later challenge the plea contending that an underlying offense has been set aside on grounds of procedural error, a defendant may be entitled to relief where an underlying offense has been set aside on grounds of material error. Facts a
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2018-03-15 · Published · cited 19× · 238 So. 3d 1139
CHAMBERLIN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is denied. The original opinions are withdrawn and these opinions substituted therefor. ¶ 2. This interlocutory appeal arises from a 2010 civil suit filed in the Circuit Court of Warren County (the "trial court") by Carol Clement against Russell Puckett. After Puckett's death in 2014, Clement substi
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2016-08-02 · Published · cited 2× · 2016 WY 76; 376 P.3d 488; 2016 Wyo. LEXIS 83; 2016 WL 4132487
FOX, Justice. [¶1] Ryan Webster stole a car in Thermop-olis and drove it through Wyoming toward Colorado. Authorities in Cheyenne were alerted, and a vehicular chase eventually ended across the Wyoming border in Colorado, where Mr. Webster was arrested and jailed. The State of Wyoming filed separate charges arising from the incident in Hot Springs County and Laramie County. The
Indiana Supreme Court · 2013-11-12 · Published · cited 12× · 997 N.E.2d 351; 2013 WL 6009719; 2013 Ind. LEXIS 873
DAVID, Justice. In this case, the defendant claims that the trial court should have given his tendered jury instruction on self-defense; however, his tendered instruction would have incorrectly limited the jury’s consideration to his subjective belief without assessing its reasonableness. Further, the defendant alleges that the trial court erred by not completely bifurcating the