Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “David Lavery and Amy Lavery”
Bower v. D'Onfropublic domain
Lavery, J. The defendants Bradley D. Ausmus and Lin Ausmus appeal1 from a judgment awarding money damages after a jury trial in an automobile negligence case. They claim that the trial court improperly (1) refused to permit testimony and evidence of the plaintiffs failure to wear a seat belt on the basis of General Statutes § 14-100a (c) (4), (2) applied the collateral sources statute to this case, (3
Gleason v. Borough of Moosicpublic domain
15 A.3d 479 (2011) David and Leslie GLEASON, Individually and as Parents of Lacie L. Gleason, a Minor, Laura L. Gleason, and Derek W. Gleason, Appellants v. BOROUGH OF MOOSIC, Pennsylvania, Michael J. Pasonick, Jr. and M.F. Ronca & Sons, Appellees. No. 7 MAP 2010. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 20, 2010. Decided April 4, 2011.
Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Brehenypublic domain
Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v Breheny (2020 NY Slip Op 07675) Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v Breheny 2020 NY Slip Op 07675 Decided on December 17, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Publish
Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Brehenypublic domain
Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v Breheny (2020 NY Slip Op 07675) Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v Breheny 2020 NY Slip Op 07675 Decided on December 17, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Publish
Wallingford Turnpike, LLC v. Webster Insurance, Inc.public domain
1 A.3d 231 (2010) 123 Conn.App. 99 WALLINGFORD TURNPIKE, LLC v. WEBSTER INSURANCE, INC. No. 30437. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued November 19, 2009. Decided August 3, 2010. *232 Katherine H. Hagmann, with whom was Amy Blume, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff). David A.
State v. Hackettpublic domain
*129 Opinion LAVERY, C. J. The defendant, Kevin J. Hackett, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was under suspension in violation of General Statutes § 1.4-2152 where his license had been suspended for having operated a moto
Russell v. Yale Universitypublic domain
*574 Opinion LAVERY, J. The plaintiffs, an heir of the settlor of a charitable trust,1 alumni donors2 and students3 of the named defendant, Yale University (Yale), appeal from the judgment of dismissal rendered by the trial court in granting Yale’s motion to
In Re M. Brett Cooper, M.D. v. the State of Texaspublic domain
ACCEPTED 15-25-00101-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/12/2025 4:25 PM
Evory v. RJM ACQUISITIONS FUNDING LLCpublic domain
505 F.3d 769 (2007) Tammy A. EVORY, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RJM ACQUISITIONS FUNDING L.L.C., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Kelly Lauer and Karla Lauer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mason, Silver, Wenk & Mishkin, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Kevin I. Captain, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARS National Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Philip Jacks
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. This is the latest in a series of cases arising from the United States’ efforts to collect some $2,600,000 in taxes owed by the late Felix Benitez Rexach, a Puerto Rican engineer who earned large sums from construction projects in the Dominican Republic between 1944 and 1958. See United Sta
Justice Indeglia, for the Court. "Economy is the method by which we prepare today to afford the improvements of tomorrow." 1 Rhode Island, unfortunately, failed to prepare for tomorrow. Its problems all came to a breaking point in 2009, at the depth of the recession, at which ti
In Re M. Brett Cooper, M.D. v. the State of Texaspublic domain
15-25-00094-CV ACCEPTED 15-25-00094-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/21/2025 11:02 PM NO. ___________________ CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE _______________________________________
Hyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. Gundersonpublic domain
279 S.W.3d 93 (2008) HYMAN & ARMSTRONG, P.S.C., et al., Appellants, v. Ronald GUNDERSON (Administrator of the Estate of Mary Margaret Gunderson), et al., Appellees. and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation (n/k/a Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation), Appellants, v. Ronald Gunderson (Administrator of the Estate of Mary Margaret Gunderson), et al., Appellees. Nos. 2006-SC-000175-DG, 2006-SC-000179-DG. <
In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
521 F.3d 169 (2008) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. William D. McCue, Barry J. Albrecht, Maureen McCue, John Baiano, Vincent McNally, Gina McNally, Lisa Deneau, Janet Healy, Michael Spiller, Frances Hickey, Joseph Healy, Lori Malloy, Leah Spiller, Timothy Villari, Maria Villari, John F. Taggart, Theresa Taggart, William Quinlan, Bertha Quinlan, James Sweeney, Kathleen Sweeney, Joan Beyer, Peter Blake, Sharon Blake, James Blake, Joh
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Innovation Ventures, LLC; Living Essentials, LLC; and International IP Holdings, LLC (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “Living Essentials”) commenced this action alleging that defendants have been involved in a widespread scheme to manufacture, distribute, and sell counterfeit 5-hour ENERGY drinks bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks and copyrig
McCue v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
WESLEY, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, Defendants contend that the district court erred in denying their motions for judgment on the pleadings for immunity under New York state law, and their motions for summary judgment for immunity under federal law. We do not have jurisdiction over the state law immunity claims, as the immunity is from liability, not suit. We do have jurisdiction over the federal claims, and hold that the
In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
762 F.Supp.2d 631 (2010) In re WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER SITE LITIGATION. In re Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. In re Combined World Trade Center and Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. Nos. 21 MC 100(AKH), 21 MC 102, 21 MC 103. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 2010. *632 Marion Sandra M
In Re: World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
06-5324-cv In Re: W orld Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 4 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 5 6 7 8 August Term, 2007 9 10 (Argued: October 1, 2007 Decided: March 26, 2008) 11 12 Docket No. 06-5324-cv 13 14 15 IN RE : WORLD TRADE CE
In re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigationpublic domain
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel