⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “David Karle Moran”

California Supreme Court · 1983-12-22 · Published · cited 94× · 673 P.2d 216; 35 Cal. 3d 229; 197 Cal. Rptr. 546; 1983 Cal. LEXIS 267
35 Cal.3d 229 (1983) 673 P.2d 216 197 Cal. Rptr. 546 JAMES MORAN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; BARBARA RICCARDO, Real Party in Interest. LUTHERAN HOSPITAL SOCIETY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; BARBARA RICCARDO, Real Party in Interest. KARL STORZ, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
Katrina Hare v. David S. Brown Enterprises, Ltd., No. 32, September Term, 2024. DISCRIMINATION – STATE GOVERNMENT § 20-705(1)-(2) – SOURCE-OF- INCOME DISCRIMINATION In 2020, the Maryland General Assembly passed the Housing Opportunities Made Equal (“HOME”) Act. See 2020 Md. Laws, Ch. 117. The HOME Act added “source of income” to a list of prohibited considerations in the rental or sale of housing. Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20-705 (2021 Repl., 2024 Supp.). The appellee, the owner of an apa
Michigan Supreme Court · 2018-06-29 · Published · cited 86× · 917 N.W.2d 355; 502 Mich. 206
Viviano, J. **210 In this case, defendant claims that the trial court violated his constitutional right to present a defense when it denied his request to appoint a DNA expert. The Court of Appeals disagreed, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that
Ohio Supreme Court · 2016-11-15 · Published · cited 5× · 2016 Ohio 7740; 147 Ohio St. 3d 478; 67 N.E.3d 769
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We reverse the First District Court of Appeals’ judgment denying the writs of mandamus and prohibition requested by appellants, the defendants in a multitude of underlying medical-malpractice cases. Appellants seek to require appellee, Judge Robert P. Ruehlman of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton
Moran v. Burbinepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1986-03-10 · Published · cited 3351× · 89 L. Ed. 2d 410; 106 S. Ct. 1135; 475 U.S. 412; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 32; 54 U.S.L.W. 4265
475 U.S. 412 (1986) MORAN, SUPERINTENDENT, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. BURBINE No. 84-1485. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 13, 1985 Decided March 10, 1986 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT *414 Constance L. Messore, Special Assistant Attor
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2020-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************* DAVID LANDIS, * * No. 15-1562V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: August 20, 2019 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Entitlement, T
Droz v. Karlpublic domain
District Court, N.D. New York · 2010-09-08 · Published · cited 2× · 736 F. Supp. 2d 520; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93326; 2010 WL 3502762
736 F.Supp.2d 520 (2010) Thomas DROZ, Plaintiff, v. Peter A. KARL, III, Esq.; Paravati, Karl, Green & DeBella; Patrick J. Hart, CPA; and Moore & Hart, CPA, Defendants. No. 6:09-CV-920. United States District Court, N.D. New York. September 8, 2010. *522 Leonard & Cummings, LLP, Hugh B. Leonard, Esq., of Counsel, Bingh
Indiana Supreme Court · 2013-03-21 · Published · cited 31× · 984 N.E.2d 618; 2013 WL 1169484; 2013 Ind. LEXIS 227
On Petition To Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 91A05-1108-CR-389 RUCKER, Justice. In this case we conclude that the waiver of the right to appeal contained in a plea agreement is unenforceable where the sentence imposed is contrary to law and the Defendant did not bargain for the sentence. Facts and Procedural His
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978-12-29 · Published · cited 12× · 385 N.E.2d 780; 67 Ill. App. 3d 1009; 24 Ill. Dec. 639; 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3900
67 Ill. App.3d 1009 (1978) 385 N.E.2d 780 ROBERT D. MATHIS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 76-508. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. Opinion filed December 29, 1978. *1010 Rex Carr and David J. Letvin, both of Cohn, Carr, Korein, Kunin and Brennan,
Hoglund v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Supreme Court · 2012-03-08 · Published · cited 177× · 962 N.E.2d 1230; 2012 Ind. LEXIS 22; 2012 WL 749416
962 N.E.2d 1230 (2012) Keith HOGLUND, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 90S02-1105-CR-294. Supreme Court of Indiana. March 8, 2012. *1231 John Pinnow, Special Assistant to the State, Public Defender, Greenwood, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-09-12 · Published · cited 28× · 836 F.3d 978; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16642; 2016 WL 4728039
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. In 2008, a Missouri jury convicted Zack-ary Stewart of murdering David Dulin. On appeal, Stewart argued the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based on newly-discovered evidence. The Supreme Court of Missouri agreed, reversed the conviction, and remanded for a new trial. State v. Stewart, 313 S.W.3d 661 (Mo. banc 2010). The charges were dro
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008-02-08 · Published · cited 33× · 450 Mass. 583; 880 N.E.2d 736; 2008 Mass. LEXIS 29
Spina, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Cowin, J., joins). I agree that a new trial is required, but I disagree with the reasoning of the court. 1. The evidence does not warrant an instruction under Commonwealth v. Burke. Although the defendant objected to the judge’s instruction on the question whether the complainant was “wholly insensible so
Hodson v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2011-11-09 · Published · cited 14× · 350 S.W.3d 169; 2011 WL 1796088
350 S.W.3d 169 (2011) Karl Anthony HODSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 04-10-00060-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. May 11, 2011. Rehearing Overruled June 24, 2011. Discretionary Review Refused November 9, 2011. *171 Kurtis S. Rudkin, Law Office of Kurtis S. Rudkin,
People v. Garnerpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969-04-08 · Published · cited 4× · 248 N.E.2d 313; 109 Ill. App. 2d 81; 1969 Ill. App. LEXIS 1136
109 Ill. App.2d 81 (1969) 248 N.E.2d 313 People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. David T. Garner, Defendant-Appellant. Gen. No. 68-11. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. April 8, 1969. *82 *83 Karl D. Dexheimer, of Pope & Driemeyer, of East St. Louis,
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994-05-10 · Published · cited 7× · 894 P.2d 422; 1994 OK CIV APP 76; 1994 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 175; 1994 WL 758464
894 P.2d 422 (1994) Jack McCLAIN, Plaintiff/Appellant, Joe K. Lester, Plaintiff, Fred Rick Opitz, Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred Opitz, and Ben McClain, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. RICKS EXPLORATION COMPANY, Sanguine Ltd., Cotton Petroleum, Inc., now Oxy USA, Inc., Hal French, Inc., Longhorn Energy Corporation, Fossill Oil and Gas, Inc., Meyer-Moran Revocable Trust, Dale Cheek, Ran Ricks, Jr., Jerral W. Jones, Don H. Nelson, R
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-12-22 · Published · cited 103× · 553 F.3d 881; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 26429; 2008 WL 5295103
553 F.3d 881 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert C. ARLEDGE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 07-60825, 08-60106. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 22, 2008. *885 Richard Terrell Starrett (argued), Harold Hendricks Brittain, Asst. U.S. Attys., Jackson, MS, for U.S. Amy M. Adelson (
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-06-21 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************* DILLON COPENHAVER and * AMANDA COPENHAVER, on * No. 13-1002V behalf of their deceased minor child, * Special Master Christian J. Moran NICHOLAS COPENHAVER, * * Filed: May 31, 2016 Petitioners, * * Ent
Ransom v. Bebernitzpublic domain
Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001-08-24 · Published · cited 14× · 782 A.2d 1155; 172 Vt. 423; 2001 Vt. LEXIS 266
782 A.2d 1155 (2001) Albert L. RANSOM v. Phyllis BEBERNITZ, Chester C. Anderson, David Ransom, et al. No. 00-142. Supreme Court of Vermont. August 24, 2001. *1157 John D. Hansen, Rutland, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Karl C. Anderson of Anderson & Eaton, P.C., Rutland, for Defendants-Appellants. Present: AMESTOY, C.J
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-02-11 · Published · cited 4× · 690 F. Supp. 2d 274; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13932; 2010 WL 582352
690 F.Supp.2d 274 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. David MORGAN, Jason Morgan, John Brown, John Franklin, Courtney Branch, Ebrima Jobarteh, and Sheldon Morgan, Defendants. No. 09 CR 699(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 11, 2010. *278 Jessica Massella and Parvin Moyne, Assistant United States Attorneys
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978-11-17 · Published · cited 4× · 586 F.2d 1020
WINTER, Circuit Judge: Defendants, Alfred David Crowell, Donal Jarrett Gillespie and Michael Marion Robertson, were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense the controlled substance phencyclidine (PCP), in violation of 21 U.S.C §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Crowell was also convicted of four separate charges of traveling in interstate co