Cases

369 F.Supp.2d 1291 (2005) Ronald O. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAXTER SPRINGS, KANSAS, Donna Wixon and Robert Myers, Defendants. No. 04-2257-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 10, 2005. *1292 *1293 Brennan P. Fagan, William J. Skepnek, Skepnek Law Firm, PA, Lawrence, KS, Sam

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

BARATTA, J., ORDER OF COURT And now, this 18th day of June, 2014, upon consideration of the defendants, Michael Jones and Barbara Jones’s, motion for partial summary judgment, and the plaintiff, Melanie Ramos’s, response thereto, it is hereby ordered that said motion is granted, and the plaintiff is precluded from asserting and recovering any and all non-economic damages due to her selection of the lim

PER CURIAM: In this case, which is not a class action, the plaintiffs, nearly 100 individuals, appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as well as the court’s denial of their subsequent Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. The complaint, which sought damages for personal injury and wrongful death resulting from exposure to asbestos, alleged that the court had di

The opinion of the court was delivered by Brenda Kay Dunn appeals her convictions by a jury of aggravated arson (K.S.A. 21-3719), conspiracy to commit arson (K.S.A.21-3302, K.S.A. 21-3718), and criminal solicitation (K.S.A.21-3303). Dunn claims: (1) There was insufficient evidence for a rational factfinder to conclude she was guilty beyond a reason

Volume 1 of 2 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAUL WAYNE DERRICK, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-4230 DALE L. DUTREMBLE; E. BART DANIEL; RICHARD GREER, Amici Curiae, and CHARLESTON POST AND COURIER, Movant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JEFFERSON MARION LONG, JR., a/k/a Bud, No. 97-4231 Defendant-Appellee. DALE L. D

ACCEPTED 03-15-00447-CV 8312763 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER MICHAEL J., DAVIS, Chief Judge. I. Summary of Decision In this case, Plaintiffs seek possessory rights and damages concerning a twelve square mile area of land in southwestern Minnesota. In order to obtain such relief, Plaintiffs sought to eject an Indian Tribe from .reservation lands and seventy-five private landowners, who, together with their ancestors, hav

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-3079, 17-3125 & 18-1207 NATHSON FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-3079, 17-3125 & 18-1207 NATHSON FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-3079, 17-3125 & 18-1207 NATHSON FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 17-3079, 17-3125 & 18-1207 NATHSON FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for t

Mihara, J. *514*65After a lengthy court trial, the People of the State of California (plaintiff) prevailed in this representative public nuisance action against defendants ConAgra Grocery Products Company (ConAgra), NL Industries, Inc. (NL), and the Sherwin

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Innovation Ventures, LLC; Living Essentials, LLC; and International IP Holdings, LLC (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “Living Essentials”) commenced this action alleging that defendants have been involved in a widespread scheme to manufacture, distribute, and sell counterfeit 5-hour ENERGY drinks bearing plaintiffs’ trademarks and copyrig

787 A.2d 786 (2001) 141 Md. App. 679 Harold H. BURNS, Jr., et al., v. SCOTTISH DEVELOPMENT CO. INC., et al. No. 0081, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 28, 2001. *788 Howard J. Schulman (Schulman & Kaufman, LLC on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellants. Laura Marold

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si

Court of Appeals DEC 2 i 2015 NO.05-15-O1362-CV Lisa Mate Clerk, 5th District IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS FOR THE 401st DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS DIANA FAY BASS, APPELLAN