Cases

308 Ga. 863 FINAL COPY S20A0259. NEWTON v. THE STATE. BLACKWELL, Justice. Cedric Newton, Jr., was tried by a Bibb County jury and convicted of murder and other crimes in connection with the fatal shooting of Udondra Hargrove. On appeal, Newton claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence of two out-of-court identifications. He also contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial. Finding no error,

Affirmed in part and Vacated in part and Opinion Filed September 29, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00747-CV CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP, Appellant V. KAREN F. NEWTON REVOCABLE TRUST, SATHU SUBBIAH, JANET ANDERS, TIM ANDERS, RAUL PEREZ, JR., JERRY BROWN, TREY MONSON, COLEEN MONSON, JILL

OPINION WALLS, Senior District Judge. This case presents a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the New Jersey law governing permits to carry handguns. The challenged provisions in N.J. Stat. § 2C:58-4 and the attendant regulations *816(the “Handgun Permit Law”) require permit applicants to demonstrate a “justifiable need to carry a handgun

273 S.W.3d 1 (2008) Daniel BREEDEN, as the Personal Representative, has consented to the substitution of the Estate of Don Merchant, and Greg Katzing, individually and on behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated consumers, Appellants, v. James N. HUESER, M.D., et al., Respondent. No. WD 68069. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 30, 2008.

PRADO, Circuit Judge: This consolidated appeal arises out of an alleged multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme perpetrated by R. Allen Stanford through his various corporate entities. These three cases deal with the scope of the preclusion provision of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (“SLUSA”). That provision states: “No covered class action based upon the statutory o

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

(2008) John WHOLEY, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen TYRELL and Paula Delaney, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-11927-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM TAURO, District Judge. Before this court are Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [# 2], and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [# 9

595 F.Supp.2d 139 (2009) Diane and James KIDDER, Plaintiffs, v. RICHMOND AREA HEALTH CENTER, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CV-08-282-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. January 29, 2009. James F. Pross, Esq., Tarbell & Brodich, P.A., Augusta, ME, for Plaintiffs. David R. Collins, Evan J. Roth, U.S. Attorney's Office District of Maine, Megan Adele

933 F.Supp. 1124 (1996) Kenneth R. JACKSON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. TRUCK DRIVERS' UNION LOCAL 42 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 92-10242-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 7, 1996. *1125 *1126 *1127

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Nicholas Lewis filed this putative class action against Scottrade, Inc,, a securities brokerage firm, alleging violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 407.010 et seq„ breach of a common law fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment. After Lewis filed the action in the Southern District of California, it w

106 S.W.3d 510 (2003) DEAN MACHINERY COMPANY, Respondent, v. UNION BANK f/k/a Bannister Bank, Appellant. Nos. WD 61205, WD 61217. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. April 15, 2003. Motion for Rehearing and Transfer Denied May 27, 2003. Application for Transfer Denied July 1, 2003. *512

OAKES, Chief Judge: BACKGROUND From the 1930’s through 1966, thousands of workers at the New York Naval Shipyard, commonly known as the Brooklyn Navy Yard (BNY), breathed air laden with carcinogenic asbestos fibers. Manufacturers of the asbestos-containing products used at BNY did not warn users of the hazards posed by asbestos dust. Nor did the Navy war

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge. This is an appeal from the dismissal, for lack of personal jurisdiction, of appellant’s petition for conversion and trespass of chattels against three non-resident defendants. Two of the defendants had been served and filed the motion to dismiss. The other defendant, who fives in Jordan, was never served. For the reasons stated below, the court dismisses the appeal for lack of a final judgment ag

Thompson, Chief Justice. Appellant Franklin Benson appeals his convictions for malice murder and other crimes relating to the death of Leslyan Williams. 1 On appeal, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his *619 convicti

ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

9 A.3d 882 (2010) 204 N.J. 320 Lula M. HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; Hon. Clark E. Bruno, Acting Commissioner of Human Services; Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital; Gregory P. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer for Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital, Defendants-Respondents. A-69 September Term 2009. Supreme Court of New Jersey.

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. When Thermal Specialties Acquisition Company, LLC, acquired Thermal Specialties, Inc., an industrial-services company, TSAC refused to fulfill TSI’s collective-bargaining obligations to its union members. In particular, TSAC chose to cease contributions to employee pension funds. Plaintiffs, wh

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion to remand. The Court, having considered the motions, the responses thereto, and the briefs and authorities cited, concludes that the motion should be DENIED. I. FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY In the instant lawsuit, which was originally filed on September 30, 20

CYR, Circuit Judge. Along with thirteen other defendants, appellant Andres Bello-Perez was charged with conspiring to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Finding no error in the indictment, trial or sentence, we affirm. I BACKGROUND Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the govern

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Samuel Goldwyn, the legendary movie mogul, reportedly said that a “verbal contract isn’t worth the paper it is written on.” 1 The same, we conclude, goes for a *1093refusal of medical care form that, if the testimony of the plaintiff is to be believed, was materially altered after he signed it. And because the val