Cases

WISE, Justice. Lawton Higgs, Sr., formerly a pastor and pastor emeritus at the Church of the Reconciler (“COR”), a United Methodist church, brought an action in the Jefferson Circuit Court against Tom Bole, a lay member of COR, alleging defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. During the proceedings, Higgs filed a civil subpoena requesting the production of certain documents from Rever

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Mark Lynn J., FILED Petitioner Below, Petitioner February 21, 2017 vs) No. 15-1034 (Mercer County 13-C-431-DS) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0275 Filed March 5, 2025 CHARLES DAVID BROWN, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Linda M. Fangman, Judge. An applicant appeals the denial of postconviction relief from his convictions for inti

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge This domestic-relations appeal arises from long-running and contentious litigation between appellant J. David John (David) and appellee Megan Marie Bolinder (Megan). The only issue in this appeal involves attorney's fees. In an order entered on December 14, 2017, the trial court ordered David to pay Megan $ 29,140 in attorney's fees. David argues that the attorney's-fee award should be reversed in its entire

587 F.Supp.2d 1236 (2008) FLORIDA CLEAN WATER NETWORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Colonel Paul L. GROSSKRUGER, etc., et al., Defendants. No. 3:08-cv-120-J-32TEM. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. October 30, 2008. *1238 Christopher H. Marraro, James Boles, Jennifer K. McDannell, Linda Gordon Hes

FIAMINGO, J.T.C. This matter is before the Tax Court on plaintiffs appeal of the decision of the Bergen County Tax Board affirming the assessment imposed on the subject property for tax year 2013. The complaint filed by plaintiff appeals an alleged denial of the Veter*346an’s Exemption available to a surviving spouse under N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.30(b).

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 24, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-1244 Lower Tribunal No. F18-24827 ________________ David Michael Carnright, Appellant,

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge | t Appellant J. David John and appellee Megan Marie Bolinder were never married, but share a son, Isaiah, who was born on March 12, 2010. 1 On February 9, 2012, the trial court entered an order awarding primary custody of the child to Megan, while awarding David visitati

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1651 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. DAVID WATSON, Defendant‐Appellant. _

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1651 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. DAVID WATSON, Defendant‐Appellant. _

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1651 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. DAVID WATSON, Defendant‐Appellant. _

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 299 CA 16-01520 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. DAVID H. PEELLE AND BAIBA PEELLE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TOWN OF IRONDEQUOIT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (BRIDGET A. O’TOOLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. LAW OFFICES OF JOHN WALLACE, ROCHESTER (DA

Kane, J. (dissenting). I do not agree with the conclusion that the refusal by the Hearing Officer to call one of the witnesses requested by petitioner to testify at the hearing resulted in noncompliance with 7 NYCRR 254.5. It is true that testimony concerning justification or mitigating circumstances is relevant in prison disciplinary proceedings (see, Matter of Coleman v Coombe, 65 NY2d 777, 780; Matter of De Mauro v

42 A.3d 379 (2012) UNITED AIRLINES, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (GANE), Respondent. No. 2028 C.D. 2011 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs March 30, 2012. Decided April 23, 2012. *380 David R. Kunz, Philadelphia, for petitioner. Gregory J. Boles, Philadelphia, for r

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 19-0048 Filed May 13, 2020 DAVID MICHAEL JOHNSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt, Judge. The Iowa Department of Transportation revoked driving privileges

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. A decade ago Cecil Watson applied for a managerial position at a post office. He was turned down, and in 1993 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission concluded that his race influenced the adverse decision. The eeoc required the Postal Service to promote Watson and restore salary and benefits lost during the interim. (When the Postal Service is the

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2022 Term FILED _______________ June 7, 2022 No. 20-0765 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK ____________

WORKMAN, Justice: *406 In 2011, Petitioner Jasman Montgomery waived his constitutional right to grand jury indictment and pled guilty by information to the first-degree murder of seventeen-year-old Matthew Flack. He received substantial benefits for proceeding in this manner including parole

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS William G., Petitioner Below, Petitioner FILED February 21, 2017 vs) No. 15-1189 (Berkeley County 12-C-336) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APP

PER CURIAM. In this appeal, the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) seeks review of an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) Final Order. The Final Order declared certain DJJ rules relating to cost sharing for secure detention invalid exercises of DJJ’s authority; specifically, DJJ’s interpretations of “final court disposition” and “actual costs.” We find the ALJ correctly determined that DJJ’s interpretations were improper.</