Cases

BARRON, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, a Maine dairy farmer seeks to reverse a summary judgment ruling that rejected his First Amendment retaliation claim against the former Commissioner of the Maine Department of Agriculture. The suit alleges that, while in office, the Commissioner used the state’s regulatory apparatus to retaliate for the First Amendment-protected conduct that t

OPINION CORNELIA A. CLARK, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SHARON G. LEE, C.J., and GARY R. WADE, JEFFREY S. BIVINS, and HOLLY KIRBY, JJ., joined. We granted permission to appeal to address two issues: (1) Whether the Governmental Tort Liability Act (“GTLA”), Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-20-10

672 S.E.2d 196 (2008) Andrew YOUNG, Administrator of the Estate of David G. Young, and Andrew Young, individually, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Pamela Sue MCINTYRE, formerly known as Pamela Sue Young and the Huntington National Bank, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 33872. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted: September 24, 2008. Decided: De

FILED May 25, 2016 TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS

948 A.2d 1152 (2008) Peter V. YOUNG and Ellen Roberts Young, Plaintiffs, v. Paul J. KLAASSAN, Teresa M. Klaassan, David W. Faeder, Timothy S. Smick, Thomas B. Newell, Brian C. Swinton, Christian B.A. Slavin, Larry E. Hulse, Tiffany L. Tomasso, Robert R. Slager, Carl Adams, Ronald V. Aprahamian, Craig R. Callen, David G. Bradley, J. Douglas Holladay, and Thomas J. Donohue, Defendants, and Sunrise Senior Living, Inc., Nominal Defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS LABELED AS CONFIDENTIAL UNDER THE PROTECTIVE ORDER BROOKE C. WELLS, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Brigham Young University and Dr. Daniel Simmons (collectively BYU) Motion For Permission to Provide Certain Documents Labeled as Confidential Under the Protective Order.1

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (FURTHER DISCOVERY SANCTIONS) BROOKE C. WELLS, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Brigham Young University’s and Dr. Daniel Simmons’ (collectively BYU) Motion for Sanctions (Further Discovery Sanctions).1 This Court has held numerous hearings regarding discovery in this case and

01/13/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 7, 2021 Session DAVID L. LILES, ET AL. v. MICHAEL E. YOUNG, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 18-467-IV Russell T. Perkins, Chancellor _________________

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 6 TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Pfizer’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Claim that Defendants Have Misappropriated “Project” and “Compilation” Trade Secrets (Count VIII of the First Amended Complaint).1 I. BACKGROUND

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 929 ¶ 1 Plaintiffs MFS Series Trust III, Merrill Lynch High Yield Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., Muniholdings Fund, Inc., Merrill Lynch Municipal Bond Fund, The National Portfolio, Merrill Lynch Municipal Strategy Fund, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., John Hancock Funds, Inc., and Put

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1130 ___________________________ In re: Ruby Jeane Sawyers Debtor ------------------------------ David G. Waltrip, LLC

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Chief Judge. This consolidated appeal involves judgments entered by the circuit courts of Shannon and Oregon counties. In 1985 the Circuit Court of Oregon County entered a judgment on a jury verdict against Lee Davis (“Ms.Davis”) in favor of Dawn Young (“Dawn”) for $65,000, and in favor of her parents, Terry and Mary Beth Young, in the amount of $16,000. Thereafter, Ms. Davis’s liability carrier paid $33

YEAGER, J., — The present action was commenced on January 8, 1997, by the plaintiffs, Barbara L. Reilly and Thomas Reilly, against the defendant, Ernst & Young LLP, successor to Arthur Young and Company and Charles Modispacher with the filing of a complaint in civil action. This complaint was later amended by the plaintiffs on January 13, 1999. The amended complaint sets forth the following claims against Ernst &

ORDER on Use of Depositions at Trial in Lieu of Otherwise Available Live Testimony J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Delta’s Motion to Preclude Improper Use of Deposi*522tions at Trial. The motion has been fully briefed and it was taken under advisement following extensive oral argument. Having reviewed the submis

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 8, 2023 Decided July 5, 2024 No. 22-5305 S. STANLEY YOUNG, DR. AND LOUIS ANTHONY COX, JR., DR., APPELLANTS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 4, 2013 Session DAVID G. YOUNG, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CITY ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE CITY OF LAFOLLETTE v. CITY OF LAFOLLETTE ET AL. Interlocutory Appeal from the Circuit Court for Campbell County No. 14453 John D. McAfee, Judge No. E2013-00441-COA-R9-CV-FILED-FEBRUARY 10, 2014 In this retaliatory discha

PER CURIAM. Derek Young appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Young v. City of Norfolk, No. CA-01-48-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2001; Mar. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 21, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 142857

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: This case involves a marijuana distribution business operated by an extended family, the Youngs, in a rural, secluded area of Southern Aabama. Members of the Young family, along with several confederates not related, were convicted for, inter alia, their participation in this conspiracy in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Patricia Young, Clyde Young, Sr., Clyde Young, Jr., Norm

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS and Judge WYNN joined. OPINION AGEE, Circuit Judge: David McCorkle and William Pender (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s order dismissing two of their class action claims against Bank of America Corp. (“the Bank”) for alleged violations of c