⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “David E. Snyder and Jennifer J. Snyder”

District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-05-21 · Published · cited 1× · 387 F. Supp. 3d 867
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: The plaintiffs in this case filed suit against U.S. Bank N.A., Wilmington Trust, *869N.A., and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company on behalf of a putative class, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the defendant banks owned certain
DeBoer v. Snyderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-11-06 · Published · cited 7× · 772 F.3d 388; 2014 WL 5748990
MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. “The great tides and currents which engulf the rest of men do not turn aside in their course to pass the judges hy.” Benjamin Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921) The author of the majority opinion has drafted what would make an engrossing TED Talk or, possibly, an introductory lecture in Political Phi
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019-04-01 · Published · cited 46× · 384 F. Supp. 3d 802
JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge *822This is a class action lawsuit that is part of the litigation collectively referred to as the Flint Water Cases. To those following these cases, the facts are by now well known. Plaintiffs, residents and property owners in Flint, Michigan, were exposed to lead, legionella, and other contaminants within the municipal wate
Illinois Supreme Court · 2004-01-23 · Published · cited 108× · 804 N.E.2d 546; 208 Ill. 2d 457; 281 Ill. Dec. 581; 2004 Ill. LEXIS 6
804 N.E.2d 546 (2004) 208 Ill.2d 457 281 Ill.Dec. 581 The PEOPLE ex rel. Lisa MADIGAN, Attorney General of Illinois, et al., Petitioners, v. Donald N. SNYDER, Jr., Director of Corrections, et al., Respondents. No. 95663. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 23, 2004. *549 Lisa Madigan
Snyder v. Snyderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-12-02 · Published · cited 1× · 300 F. App'x 440
PER CURIAM. Gary Snyder appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment disposing of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review, we have found no basis for reversal and therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-04-06 · Published · cited 5× · 684 F. App'x 710
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiffs
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-09-15 · Published · cited 184× · 834 F.3d 696
OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Like many states, Michigan has amended its Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) on a number of occasions in recent years for the professed purpose of making Michigan communities safer and aiding law enforcement in the task of bringing recidivists to justice. Thus, what began in 1994 as a non-public registry mai
Schiavone v. Snyderpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002-11-26 · Published · cited 5× · 73 Conn. App. 712; 812 A.2d 26; 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 599
Opinion MIHALAKOS, J. The plaintiff, Jennifer Schiavone, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her appeal from the order of the Probate Court approving the interim account filed by the conservator of her late mother’s estate. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly held that (1) she was not an aggrieved party and had no standing to appeal and (2) she was prec
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018-08-01 · Published · cited 0× · 329 F. Supp. 3d 369
JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge On April 25, 2014, Flint, Michigan's water switched from the supply provided by the Detroit Water and Sewer Department ("DWSD") to water from the Flint River, treated by the Flint Water Treatment Plant ("FWTP"). As set forth in the complaint, from that switch came the Flint water contamination crisis. The water was not treated properly for human consumption, and the residents of Flint did
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016-12-08 · Published · cited 1× · 149 A.3d 1060
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Nos. 11-FS-1217, 11-FS-1218, 11-FS-1255, 11-FS-1256, DEC - 8 2016 11-FS-1257, 11-FS-1258, 11-FS-1259 & 11-FS-1260 IN RE TA.L.; IN RE A.L.; IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W.; IN RE PETITION OF E.A.; ADA-115-09; A.H. AND T.L. ADA-116-09; Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-07-19 · Published · cited 16× · 864 F.3d 280
OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge Appellants, who are oil producers, sold their product to SemGroup L.P. and affiliates (including SemCrude L.P.), midstream oil and gas service providers and the Debtors in the underlying Chapter 11 cases. SemGroup sold oil to and traded oil futures with Appellees, downstream oil purchasers. The producers took no actions to protect themselves in case of Sem-Group’
District Court, N.D. California · 2005-02-17 · Published · cited 9× · 392 F. Supp. 2d 1116; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25385; 2005 WL 418542
392 F.Supp.2d 1116 (2005) Dale SNYDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C 03-4234(BZ). United States District Court, N.D. California. February 17, 2005. *1117 *1118 *1119 Steven Bauer, Deepa Shailesh Vora, Latham
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013-02-28 · Published · cited 3× · 109 Fed. Cl. 760; 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 130; 2013 WL 766531
Contract damages; expectation damages; cost of cover; reasonableness of mitigation; foreseeability; causation of damages. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CLAIMS OF STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case, before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal C
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-12-23 · Published · cited 11× · 946 F.3d 227
Case: 18-30876 Document: 00515246589 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/23/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-30876 FILED December 23, 2019
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 109 Fed. Cl. 460; 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 129; 2013 WL 751280
Contract damages; expectation damages; cost of cover; reasonableness of mitigation; foreseeability; causation of damages. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CLAIMS OF CENTRAL SAN JOAQUIN WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case, before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeal
Snyder v. Footepublic domain
Alaska Supreme Court · 1991-12-13 · Published · cited 3× · 822 P.2d 1353; 1991 Alas. LEXIS 146; 1991 WL 262462
OPINION RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice. A jury returned a defense verdict in a medical malpractice suit. The Snyders appeal the admission of certain evidence. We reverse. I. The parties do not dispute the relevant underlying facts. On July 6,1987, Jennifer Snyder’s parents took her to see Dr. Timothy Foote, a pediatrician. Jennifer was six years old, and was complai
Michigan Supreme Court · 2021-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Michigan Supreme Court · 2021-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-09-11 · Published · cited 3× · 968 F. Supp. 2d 411; 2013 WL 4832705; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129690
*416 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I.INTRODUCTION Defendants Joseph Zolot, a physician, and Lisa Pliner, a nurse practitioner, are charged with illegal distribution of methadone, oxycodone, and fentanyl under the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), 21 U.S.C. § 841. They are also charged with conspiracy. The i
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0292-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/17/2015 4:35:05 PM Accepted 12/18/2015 8:08:53 AM