Cases

BARNES, Presiding Judge. These two cases involve different plaintiffs and opposing trial court rulings but the same defendants and the same three financial instruments. The issue in both appeals is whether these instruments were securities under Georgia law or simply investments in a common venture. The plaintiffs contend that the investments were unregistered securities and that they are entitled to the return of the money

de JESÚS, Bankruptcy Judge, dissenting. I begin with a synopsis of the salient undisputed facts. Joanne M. Cushing is a single mother caring for three children. She encountered financial difficulties. After obtaining the automatic extension for filing her 2006 federal tax return, she sought bankruptcy protection under chapter 13 of the Code. During the § 341(a) meeting, Ms. Cushing was examined on matters other

ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (Docket # 69). As explained herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing their Complaint (Docket # 1) on August 5, 2

738 F.Supp.2d 146 (2010) Rep. Andre E. CUSHING III, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Walter F. McKEE, et al., Defendants. No. 1:10-cv-330-GZS. United States District Court, D. Maine. September 15, 2010. *147 Anita Y. Woudenberg, James Bopp, Jr., Josiah Neeley, Sarah E. Troupis, Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom, Terre Haute, IN, David P. Crocker

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant Michael Cushing appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Pauley, /.), convicting him, after a two-week trial, of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, obstruction of justice, and perjury

HJELM, J. [¶ 1] David Sullivan appeals from a post-judgment order, entered by the District Court (Portland, Moskowüz, J.), denying his motions to modify and enforce the parties’ divorce judgment. Sullivan contends that the court erred by denying his motions and by declining to allow him to call a rebuttal witness. Because we conclude that the court erred when

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1177 ROBERT R. CUSHING, individually and in his capacity as the Minority Leader of the N.H. House of Representatives; DAVID COTE; KATHERINE D. ROGERS; KENDALL SNOW; PAUL BERCH; DIANE LANGLEY; CHARLOTTE DILORENZO; N.H. DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. SHERMAN PACKARD, in his official capacity as Speaker of the

EDMONDS J., specially concurring. Defendant is alleged to have committed professional malpractice in handling litigation because he did not raise merger as a defense. Although I agree that summary judgment is not appropriate, I disagree with the majority’s reasoning. A discussion of the facts will show why I write separately. Plaintiffs purchased restaurant property from Victor and Mary

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1177 ROBERT R. CUSHING, individually and in his capacity as the Minority Leader of the N.H. House of Representatives, DAVID COTE; KATHERINE D. ROGERS; KENDALL SNOW; PAUL BERCH; DIANE LANGLEY; CHARLOTTE DILORENZO; N.H. DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. SHERMAN PACKARD, in his official capacity as Speaker of the

258 F.3d 465 (6th Cir. 2001) United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David Stafford, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-5706 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: December 1, 2000Decided and Filed: July 17, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Terry M. Cushing, Monica Wheatle

Cushing v Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 05275) Cushing v Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 2019 NY Slip Op 05275 Decided on June 28, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Cushing v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 2012 IL App (1st) 100768 Appellate Court F. JOHN CUSHING, Administrator de bonis non of the Estate of Claudia Caption Zvunca, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants-Appel

965 N.E.2d 1215 (2012) 358 Ill. Dec. 736 F. John CUSHING, Administrator de bonis non of the Estate of Claudia Zvunca, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and Motor Coach Industries International, Inc., Defendants-Appellants (Cristina Zvunca, a Minor, By Her Guardian ad litem, David J. Gubbins, Plaintiff; Wesley Jay Tatum, Defendant). No. 1-10-0768. Appellate C

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Cushing v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 103197 Appellate Court F. JOHN CUSHING, Administrator de bonis non of the Estate of Claudia Caption Zvunca, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.; MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES, INC.; and MOTOR COACH INDUSTRIES INTERNA

OPINION GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Federal drug enforcement agents arrested defendants-appellees David Lopez-Arias and Antonio Egues for trafficking in cocaine. After a federal grand jury indicted them, defendants moved to suppress certain evidence, alleging that it was obtained as a result of an unlawful arrest. The district court granted defendants’ motion

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. DAVID ROMAN Docket: SJC-13348 Dates: September 11, 2024. - March 5, 2025 Present:

444 S.W.2d 815 (1969) Henry Etta Cushing LEWIS et al., Appellants, v. David D. CUSHING, Appellee. No. 7079. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. September 4, 1969. Robert D. Nogueira, Beeville, for appellants. Paul Hill, Corpus Christi, for appellee. KEITH, Justice. The natural mother appeals from a judgment, based upon a jury verdict, whi

OPINION DUGGAN, District Judge. In this interlocutory appeal, the government challenges the district court’s decision to suppress evidence seized at the residence of Barbara Jean Sutton and Peter Jansen Sutton (collectively the “Sut-tons”) pursuant to two search warrants. The district court concluded that the trial commissioner who issued the search warrant

OPINION COCHRAN, J., filed a concurring opinion. I agree that the trial judge did not err when he instructed the jury on the “unknown” manner and means of committing murder. I write separately because I believe that this area' of law has become overly formalististic and divorced from its original purpose of giving notice to the defendant. The common-law r

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1889-11 DAVID LEN MOULTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS CASS COUNTY C OCHRAN, J., filed a concurring opinion.