Cases

OPINION PER CURIAM: Serial Appellant, Jean Coulter, appeals pro se from the order entered on April 1, 2016. In this case, we hold that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 233.1 is not void for vagueness under the federal and state constitutions and that our Supreme Court had the authority under the Pennsylvania Constitution to

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, David Coulter, appeals from the April 11, 2007 judgment entry of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, in which he was sentenced for rape and sexual battery. {¶ 2} On December 28, 2006, appellant was indicted by the Portage County Grand Jury on two counts of rape, felonies of the first degree, in violation of R.C. 2907.02

The opinion of the court was delivered by Johnson, J.: Royalty owners entitled to receive a share of the production of natural gas in tire Hugoton gas field in southwest Kansas brought a class action against Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (APC) claiming that the company and its affiliates had effected an underpayment of the royalties required by the plaintiffs’ respective oil and gas leases. The original petiti

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant George Stuck appeals from a judgment of the trial court dismissing both his personal injury claim and his claim for uninsured/underinsured (UM/UIM) motorists benefits. Stuck contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his claims for damages against the alleged tortfeasor, Dennis Coulter, because the court had previously granted a default judgment against Coulter and had sched

PUDLOWSKI, Judge. Defendant, Lee Coulter, appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County of two counts of conspiracy to commit murder, one count of first degree assault and one count of armed criminal action. He was sentenced to life imprisonment plus thirty-three years. We affirm in part and reverse in part. On May 29, 1992, between 9:30 and 10:00 p.m., Milton and June Chisum were at

106 F.3d 413 97 CJ C.A.R. 155 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, o

MEMORANDUM OPINION COOPER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on two motions: Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey’s (“Rutgers”) motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 24 to intervene in this action, and defendant Beckman Coulter, Inc.’s (“Beckman”) motion pursuant to Rule 19 to join Rutgers as a party in this action. Plaintiff Princeton Biochemicals, Inc. (“PBI”)

The petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, pursuant to a request for temporary custody made by the officials of Putnam County, Georgia, according to the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act ("Interstate Agreement on Detainers"). The appellant is presently in the custody of the Alabama Department of Corrections, pursuant to his conviction of capital murder for a robbery murder. He was sentenced to death. In sentencing t

Appellate Case: 24-6026 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 04/15/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 15, 2025

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT JEAN COULTER, : No. 59 WM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : :

BUTTLER, P. J. The state appeals from a post-conviction judgment that vacated and set aside petitioner’s sentence and remanded him to the Klamath County Circuit Court for resentencing. At the time of petitioner’s initial sentencing in 1979 for the crime of robbery in the first degree, the trial court found him to be a dangerous offender. The court then attempted to sentence him to the maximum term of impriso

328 N.W.2d 232 (1982) Earl Grant COULTER, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Donna Jean COULTER, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 10189. Supreme Court of North Dakota. December 17, 1982. *233 David Kessler, Grand Forks, for defendant and appellant. Pearson & Christensen, Grand Forks, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by Doug

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of error coram nobis. In 1981, David Leroy Coulter's conviction for the capital killing and robbery of George Morris and sentence of death were reversed because of a constitutional infirmity in the death penalty act under which he was prosecuted. Coulter v. State,396 So.2d 1098 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981), on authority of Beck v.Alabama, 447 U.S. 625

David Leroy Coulter was sentenced to die for the intentional killing of one George Morris during the course of a robbery. Code 1975, § 13-11-2 (a)(2). On appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals, Coulter raised several issues which he claimed entitled him to either a new trial or to a new sentence hearing. The Court of Criminal Appeals, in a lengthy opinion, discussed each of Coulter's arguments, found no reversible error, and after independently determining that the sentence of death

CAMERON, Justice. The defendant (petitioner), David T. Hinson, is charged with four counts of driving while intoxicated (DWI) and three counts of driving with a blood alcohol content in excess of .10 percent. A.R.S. § 28-692. The charges were all class 5 felonies, as petitioner has two prior DWI convictions. A.R.S. § 28-692.01(F). From a denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss, defendant petitioned this court for a special a

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EMILY COULTER, Individually, as ) Administratrix of the Estate of Bryan ) Dukes, Deceased, and as Next Friend) and Guardian of J.F., a minor, O.D., ) a minor, J.F., O.D. and R.D., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N20C-12-207 SPL

PER CURIAM: In this capital case appeal, we affirm the district court’s denial of habeas corpus relief. BACKGROUND In October 1978, appellant, David L. Coulter, was convicted of capital murder in Colbert County, Alabama. 1 The trial judge sentenced Coulter to death. Th

Reversed and remanded on the authority of Beck v. State,396 So.2d 645 (Ala. 1981). REVERSED AND REMANDED. All Judges concur. *Page 1099

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge. | ¶ This appeal involves the division of property and debt after a divorce. Daniel Ray Horton brings this appeal from the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s decree ending his marriage to Virginia Ruth Horton. For reversal, Mr. Horton contends that the circuit court erred by (1) denying his motion for a new trial because he was denied the opportunity for a fair trial and an opportunity

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge. | ¶ Appellant Jamie Russenberger appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing her complaint against appellees Thomas Pest Control, Inc.; Marilyn Thomas Robison, individually; Marilyn Robison d/b/a Thomas Pest Control, Inc.; Bobby Hill, individually; Bobby Hill as “Operations Manager” of Thomas Pest Control, Inc.; and Western Surety Company.1 For s