Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “David Bruce Martin”
Bruce v. McDonaldpublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is OrdeRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Wardell David Ford v. Bruce Curtispublic domain
OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Wardell David Ford, a Michigan state prisoner, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment. BACKGROUND In 1991, Fo
Martin v. Martinpublic domain
287 S.W.3d 260 (2009) Denise L. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Bruce Q. MARTIN, Appellee. No. 05-07-01571-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. April 13, 2009. Rehearing Overruled June 17, 2009. *261 Peter K. Munson, Christina A. Tillett, Sherman, TX, for Appellant. David M. Stagner, Stagner & Corley, Sherman,
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00401-CV Appellants, Rene Ffrench, John Richard Dial, and Stuart Bruce Sorgen// Cross-Appellants, Dana Martin and Friendship Homes & Hangars, LLC v. Appellees, Friendship Homes & Hangars, LLC; Windermere Oaks Water Supply Corporation; Dana Martin, William Earnest, Thomas Michael Madden, Robert Mebane, Joe Gimenez,
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 10, 2024 NO. 03-23-00401-CV Appellants, Rene Ffrench, John Richard Dial, and Stuart Bruce Sorgen// Cross-Appellants, Dana Martin and Friendship Homes & Hangars, LLC v. Appellees, Friendship Homes & Hangars, LLC; Windermere Oaks Water Supply Corporation; Dana Martin, William Ea
Martin v. Trott Law, P.C.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND DENYING DEFENDANT DAVID TROTT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge This second round of dispositive motions deals with the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint and the defendants’ answers and affirmative d
In Re Martinpublic domain
358 S.W.3d 767 (2012) In re Scott D. MARTIN. No. 06-11-00126-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted: January 12, 2012. Decided: January 12, 2012. *768 Bruce A. Smith, Ward & Smith Law Firm, Longview, Philip A. Werner, David P. Ayers, Scott E. Raynes, Werner Kerrigan Ayers, LLP, Houston, for appellant.
LILLARD, Judge. In this case, Plaintiff, Martin H. Aussen-berg (“Aussenberg”), appeals the trial court’s *369 valuation of his former partnership’s work-in-progress and accounts receivable as well as its finding regarding Aussenberg’s interest in the partnership’s accounts receivable and work-in-pro
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00401-CV Appellants, Rene Ffrench, John Richard Dial, and Stuart Bruce Sorgen// Cross-Appellants, Dana Martin and Friendship Homes & Hangars, LLC v. Appellees, Friendship Homes & Hangars, LLC; Windermere Oaks Water Supply Corporation; Former and Current Directors Dana Martin, William Earnest, Thomas Michael Ma
Martin v. Trott Law, P.C.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS, GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND ORDERING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Brian J. Martin and Yahmi Ñundley have filed the present lawsuit, as members of a putative class, alleging that the defendants violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA
MARTIN, Circuit Judge: Bruce Rich is an Orthodox Jew serving time as a prisoner of the State of Florida. He filed a pro se complaint against the Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections and other defendants 1 alleging violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (R
People of Michigan v. Bruce Martin Farleypublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 8, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 160131
Paul Solomon v. Lockheed Martin Corporationpublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge. Paul Solomon brought a False Claims Act action against his employer Northrop Grumman and against Lockheed Martin for making false claims against the government. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court held that it lacked jurisdiction over Solomon’s claims based on the Act’s public disclosure bar. We AFFIRM.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00544-CV Style: Terry Neff and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. v. Nicholas F. Brady, David J. Butters, William E. Macaulay, Robert B. Millard, Ro
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00544-CV Style: Terry Neff and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. Nicholas F. Brady, David J. Butters, William E. Macaulay, Robert B. Millard, Rober
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00544-CV Style: Terry Neff and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. v. Nicholas F. Brady, David J. Butters, William E. Macaulay, Robert B. Millard, Ro
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00544-CV Style: Terry Neff and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. v. Nicholas F. Brady, David J. Butters, William E. Macaulay, Robert B. Millard, Ro
Martin v. ERMC, IIpublic domain
23 So.3d 1008 (2009) Lynette M. MARTIN v. ERMC, II, et al. No. 09-491. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 4, 2009. *1009 Laurence E. Best, Mark E. Best, Best Koeppel, A.P.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellants, American Home Assurance Company ERMC, II, L.P. Miles A. Matt, Law Offices of Matt &a;
David Anthony Martin v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-17-00145-CR ________________________ DAVID ANTHONY MARTIN, APPELLANT V. STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE
David Anthony Martin v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-17-00145-CR ________________________ DAVID ANTHONY MARTIN, APPELLANT V. STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE