Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “David Brock Hays”
Manchanda v. Hays Worldwide, LLCpublic domain
ORDER JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Defendant Hays Worldwide,, LLC and David Hays’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 43] is DENIED; (2) All parties shall submit to the court proposed redactions to Liability Release and Assumption of
David McKim v. Jack B. Sullivanpublic domain
Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 485 Digitally signed by Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2022.08.04 11:45:03 -05'00' Adobe Acrobat version: DIVISION II 2022.001.20169 No. CV-18-994 DAVID L. MCKIM Opinion Delivered: October 23, 2019
Brock v. Statepublic domain
676 So.2d 991 (1996) James Edward BROCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 94-1250. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 11, 1996. Rehearing Denied July 26, 1996. *992 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Chet Kaufman, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ro
David Lynn Jordan v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 3, 2016 Session DAVID LYNN JORDAN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-11-159 Don R. Ash, Senior Judge No. W2015-00698-CCA-R3-PD - Filed October 14, 2016 _____________________________ The petitioner, David Lynn Jordan, appeals the
Jason Oil Company v. Littlerpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Johnson, J.: This is a quiet title action involving the mineral interests in two tracts of real estate that were conveyed by deeds in which the grantor excepted the mineral interests for a "period of 20 years or as long thereafter" as minerals may be produced. The grantor's successors in interest (Grantor's heirs) claim that the future interes
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Spring 2024 Term July 12, 2024 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK INTERMEDIA
Martin v. Commonwealthpublic domain
KELLER, J., DISSENTING: The majority opinion accurately sets forth the law with regard to unanimous verdict issues. However, ,1 dissent from the majority’s opinion reversing Martin’s *18convictions for two reasons. First, I believe that, in this case, the error cited by the majority simply is not palpable. To establish that palpable error occurred, a defen
State v. Prierpublic domain
725 S.W.2d 667 (1987) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Michael Steve PRIER, Appellant. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. February 16, 1987. *668 Rogers N. Hays, Jerry W. Wallace, Wade, Forrester, Hays & Wallace, Pulaski, for appellant. W.J. Michael Cody, Atty. Gen. & Reporter David M. Himmelreich, Deputy Advocate General, N
People v. Redigerpublic domain
JUSTICE GABRIEL delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 We granted the People's petition and David Delbert Rediger's cross-petition for certiorari from the court of appeals division's decision affirming in part and reversing in part Rediger's convictions for (1) interference with a public employee in a public building under section 18-9-110(1), C.R.S. (2017), and (2) interference with t
JP Morgan Trust Co. v. Mid-America Pipeline Co.public domain
473 F.Supp.2d 1162 (2007) JP MORGAN TRUST COMPANY, National Association, in its capacity as Trustee of the FI Liquidating Trust, on behalf of Farmland Industries, Inc., now known as Reorganized FLI, Inc., Plaintiff, v. MID-AMERICA PIPELINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 05-2231-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 12, 2007.
State v. Ashepublic domain
226 S.E.2d 398 (1976) 30 N.C. App. 74 STATE of North Carolina v. Lloyd Calvin ASHE and Hillard Prince Ashe. No. 7630SC210. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. July 7, 1976. Certiorari Denied September 1, 1976. Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. David S. Crump, Raleigh, for the State. McKeever, Edwards
GEE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Sara Price was injured in a truck accident caused by the negligent driv *495 ing of defendant David Westmoreland, a truck driver for defendant Utah Carriers, Inc., an interstate trucking company. The district court found th
Hirsch v. Vermont Department of Taxespublic domain
Gibson, J. In these consolidated appeals, we consider whether 32 V.S.A. § 5822, as it existed in 1989 through 1992, improperly taxed income earned on federal obligations. The Washington Superior Court concluded § 5822 impermissibly taxed such income and held the statute unconstitutional. We conclude that § 5822 as it existed during 1989 through 1992 violates 31 U.S.C. § 3124, which exempts United States stocks and obligations fro
People v. Redigerpublic domain
Opinion by JUDGE WEBB *909¶ 1 A jury convicted David Delbert Rediger of interfering with a public employee in a public building under section 18-9-110(1), C.R.S. 2014, and interfering with staff, faculty, or students of an educational institution under section 18-9-109(2), C.R.S. 2014. He appeals on two grounds: first, the evidence was insuffic
Censke v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION Following a two-day bench trial in July 2013, I found in favor of the government on all counts of Mr. Censke’s Federal Tort Claims Act Complaint. My decision was based in part on Mr. Censke’s contrived and mendacious testimony. See Censke v. United States, 27 F.Supp.3d 920 (N.D.Ill.2014); [D
Elliott, J.: David A. Norlin appeals the denial of his motion and the granting of the Cloud County Community College Board of Trustees’ (College) motion for summary judgment. We affirm. The facts are not really in dispute. Norlin is a tenured teacher at the College and was paid a base salary plus additional income for additional duties as specified in his contract. While Norlin’s teaching ass
United States v. Wakninepublic domain
IKUTA, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority that Wak-nine’s sentence should be vacated and the case should be remanded for resentencing. I further concur in the majority’s decision not to reassign this case to a different judge on remand. On the restitution issue, I agree with the majority that the district court clearly erred in it
McMickle v. Griffinpublic domain
254 S.W.3d 729 (2007) Linda McMICKLE, Administra-Trix of the Estate of Calvin McMickle, Deceased, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. David GRIFFIN and David E. Taylor, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 06-672. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 5, 2007. Supplemental Opinion on Denial of Rehearing May 17, 2008. *734 Easley
CHAFIN, Judge. Advance Auto and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America (referred to collectively as “the employer”) appeal a decision of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission (“the commission”) awarding Brenda Lee Craft (“Craft”) benefits for cervical and thoracic spinal injuries resulting from an accident at work. On
Isp. Com LLC. v. Theisingpublic domain
805 N.E.2d 767 (2004) ISP.COM LLC and ISP.net LLC, Appellants (Defendants below), v. David J. THEISING, Receiver of IQuest Internet, Inc., Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 29S02-0308-CV-00366. Supreme Court of Indiana. March 4, 2004. Rehearing Denied June 1, 2004. *768 Jeffrey R. Gaither, T. Joseph Wendt, Indianap