Cases

TABOR, J. The State appeals from the dismissal of Brian Miller’s operating while intoxicated (OWI) charge, asserting that the timing of the trial information did not violate the speedy indictment rule. The success of that challenge hinges on whether Miller was “arrested” for OWI on the same day he was cited for interference with official acts. Finding the result was dictated by the supreme court’s interpr

OPINION CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: The First Amendment of the Constitution protects citizens from attempts by government officials to chill their speech. One question presented by this case is whether that same constitutional guarantee also requires those officials to remain silent when accused of misconduct, lest they risk liability for unlawful retaliatio

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. Thirteen years ago, this court suggested that cross-examination may be required in school disciplinary proceedings where the case hinged on a question of credibility. Flaim v. Med. Coll. of Ohio , 418 F.3d 629 , 641 (6t

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

MANSFIELD, Justice. I. Introduction. What is a “criminal case”? Today, we are asked to answer this seemingly simple question in the context of Iowa’s recently enacted expungement law. That law mandates expungement of the record when “[t]he criminal case contains one or more criminal charges in which an acquittal was en

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2099 ___________________________ Brian J. Dorsey Petitioner - Appellant v. David Vandergriff

PARKER, Justice. Laura Miller appeals from..a summary judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court (“the circuit court”) in favor of the City of Birmingham (“the City”), Sandy Roberts, and Alice Crutchfield (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the City defendants”). I. Facts and Procedural History Robert Jeffrey Miller, Mrs. Miller’s husband, was employed by the City as a firef

611 F.Supp.2d 274 (2009) Brian CONGELOSI, Plaintiff, v. Superintendent David MILLER, Eastern Correctional Facility, Defendant. No. 02-CV-6014 CJS. United States District Court, W.D. New York. April 27, 2009. *279 Brian Congelosi, Albion, NY, pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Rochester,

GOULD, J., dissenting: ¶ 24 Arizona’s procedure for denying bail has one sole purpose: protecting children *216from persons charged with serious sex crimes. This same procedure has been used for over 200 years to protect the community from persons accused of committing dangerous, violent offenses. I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that Arizo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 16–1650 Filed May 11, 2018 DAVID M. POWERS, Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, George L. Stigler, Judge. Applicant for postconviction relief filed an interlocutory appeal of the district court ruling quashing his subpoena for discovery of police investigative reports and the district cour

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Like many local governments, the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners opens its meetings with a religious invocation. These opening prayers are the subject of this litigation. A group of Secular Humanists and atheists challenge them as violating the Establishment Clause, arguing that the County has wrongfully barred them from offering invocations of thei

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant Audra Lynn Harris is a former inmate of Bedford Hills Correctional Facility. She testified at her deposition that, while incarcerated at Bed-ford Hills, a male officer and three female officers entered her room to take down cotton that she had removed from her mattress and pasted to her room’s windows. The male officer then demanded to know if Harris had any more cotton. According to Harris’s test

594 F.3d 8 (2010) Richard MILLER, Appellant v. Deborah A.P. HERSMAN, Chairman, National Transportation Safety Board, Appellee. No. 08-5494. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 17, 2009. Decided February 5, 2010. *9 David A. Young argued the cause for the appellant. Carl S

OPINION AND ORDER Myron H. Thompson, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs West Alabama Women’s Center, a Tuscaloosa clinic that provides abortions and other reproductive-health services, and William J. Parker, M.D., the clinic’s physician, filed this as-applied Fourteenth Amendment challenge to an abortion regulation with which they could not comply and which had forced the clinic to close. The defendant

(2008) Richard MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Mark V. ROSENKER, Chairman National Transportation Safety Board, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-562 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 25, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Plaintiff Richard Miller brings this action against Defendant Mark V. R

760 N.W.2d 818 (2008) 280 Mich. App. 687 MILLER v. MALIK. Docket No. 277952. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted June 3, 2008, at Detroit. Decided September 18, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. *819 McKeen & Associates, P.C., Detroit (by Brian J. McKeen and Ramona C. Howard), for Nancy Miller.</

(2008) Richard MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Mark V. ROSENKER, Chairman National Transportation Safety Board, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-1071(GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 29, 2008. MEMORANDUM ORDER GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Plaintiff Richard Miller brings this action ("Miller II") against Defendant Mark

OPINION Myron H. Thompson, United States District Judge Providers of abortion and other reproductive-health services in Alabama challenge two 2016 state statutes that regulate abortions and abortion clinics. The first statute, which the court will call the “school-proximity law,” provides that the Alabama Department of Public Health may not issue or renew licenses to abortion clinics located within 2,0

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY {¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellants, David and Keville Miller (collectively "the Millers"), appeal from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas dismissing their case against Attorney Brian J. Williams and his Limited Partnership (collectively "Attorney Williams"). This Court affirms. I {¶ 2} On March 7, 2006,

P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH, PRESIDING JUDGE: ¶ 1 David Wayne Miller II and Heather Leigh Miller (Millers) appeal the refusal of the district court to- vacate a personal judgment made against them during the pen-dency of a bankruptcy stay, and the court’s refusal to vacate a resulting deficiency order, On review, we find the in personmi judgment was void because it was made during the bankruptcy stay, and the subsequent de