Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “David Barber”
Ronnie L. Bonner v. David Barberpublic domain
Decisions of The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Without Published Opinions Dismissed.
FILED F ebru.a.ey 23 2tn TN COURTOF l\'ORKI.R.S'COUPI. S.>UION
DAVID AUBREY BARBER vs STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID AUBREY BARBER, Appellant, Case No. 5D22-0052 v. LT Case No. 2019-CF-000447-A STATE OF FLORIDA,
Bartlett v. Barberpublic domain
1. Pit’s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (COA15-72) 1. Dismissed 2. Pit’s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel 2. Dismissed
People of Michigan v. David Michael Barberpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 13, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161277 &
People of Michigan v. David Michael Barberpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan May 13, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161277 &
City of Dallas v. Barber, David L.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-12-00965-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS
City of Dallas v. Barber, David L.public domain
Order entered February 11, 2013 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00965-CV CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant V. DAVID L. BARBER, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court
Bonner v. Barberpublic domain
Decisions of The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Without Published Opinions Transferred to Sup. Ct. for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
City of Dallas v. Barber, David L.public domain
Order entered October 4 , 2012 In The Court of appeafo jfiftb 313iotritt of Texao at 1aftao No. 05-12-00965-CV CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant V. DAVID L. BARBER, Appellee On Appeal from
Barber v. City of Springfieldpublic domain
943 N.E.2d 1157 (2011) David BARBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, and Legacy Pointe Development Company, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 4-10-0199. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. January 26, 2011. *1159 David Barber, pro se.
Sharkey v. Barberpublic domain
ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Under section 15-l-49(2)’s discovery rule, in actions “involvpng] latent injury or disease, the cause of action does not accrue *1246until the plaintiff `has discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury."1 But this provision only applies to "actions for which n
EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983, John D. Dean sued Sheriff Mel Bailey of Jefferson County, Alabama, the Jefferson County Sher *1212 iff s Department and Jefferson County District Attorney David Barber. Dean claimed his constitutional rights were violated by defendants’ policie
Barber v. Bicepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge. When leaders fail to lead, all types of maladies tend to follow. The reasons behind such failures are many and varied. There may be a failure to account for the critical nature of a particular crisis. Petty politics and self-interest (rather than the interests of those who should be served) may improperly motivate those tapped to lead. Off
Barber v. LM Property & Casualty Insurancepublic domain
782 F.Supp.2d 628 (2011) David BARBER, Plaintiff, v. LM PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant. No. 10 C 0213. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 22, 2011. *629 John L. Nisivaco, Boudreau & Nisivaco, LLC, Robert R. Duncan, Duncan Law Group, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Pla
State v. Barberpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 99-1-02283-3, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered March 16, 2001. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, J., concurred in by Morgan and Bridgewater, JJ.
United States v. Barberpublic domain
ORDER ON RESTITUTION P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief Judge. Defendant Brandon Lynn Barber was originally indicted in case 12-50035 on July 11, 2012 and in case 13-50004 on January 16, 2013. Barber ultimately pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to two counts of a third superseding indictment in 12-50035 (one count of conspiracy to commit bankruptcy fraud and one count of money laundering)
Morgan v. Barber Bros. Contracting Co.public domain
McCLENDON, J., concurring. hBased on current jurisprudence regarding the effect of the 1983 amendments to the workers’ compensation statute and given the deference owed the Office of Workers’ Compensation with regard to credibility determinations, I cannot conclude that the Office of Workers’ Compensation committed manifest error in finding that Barber Brothers met its burden of proof to show that Mr. Morgan
Barber v. Cornerstone Community Outreach, Inc.public domain
MURDOCK, Justice. On December 30, 2008, Governor Bob Riley issued Executive Order No. 44 creating the Governor’s Task Force on Illegal Gambling (“the Task Force”). The order stated that the purpose of the Task Force was “promoting and supporting uniform statewide enforcement of Alabama’s anti-gambling laws and to carry out the Alabama Constitution’s strong public policy against lottery schemes and illegal gambling.” The order
Patterson v. Barberpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons