Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: Bronnimann Motions THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court are defendant Roland Bronnimann’s (“Bronnimann”) Motion to Dismiss the Cargill complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and the Car-gill plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Roland *64Bronnimann’s testimony.1 U

JJ\ 'ff\). ... ,. try ,~, Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus ~I From Smith County ~ Ex Parte: KIMBERLY CARGILL (Name of ,A.pplicant) 241stoistn

843 F.Supp. 759 (1994) Frederick ASHMORE, David Boya, William Simone, and Richard Simeone, Plaintiffs, v. NORTHEAST PETROLEUM DIVISION OF CARGILL, INC., Northeast Petroleum Corporation of Maine, Northeast Petroleum Corporation of Cape Cod, d/b/a Northeast Petroleum, and Cargill, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 93-199-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. January 19, 1994.

490 F.Supp.2d 994 (2007) Glynn JONES, Plaintiff, v. CARGILL, INC., Defendant. No. 05-CV-129-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. March 6, 2007. *995 Thomas Andrew Newkirk, Fiedler & Newkirk, PLC, Urbandale, IA, for Plaintiff. Mark A. Zaiger, Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, Cedar Rapids, IA

Schindler, J. ¶ 1 Following the second trial in this case, a jury convicted Bruce Allen Hummel of premeditated murder in the first degree of his spouse, Alice Kristina Hummel. Even when viewed in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence does not support finding the essential element of premeditation beyond a reasonable doubt.

YELVERTON, Judge. Cargill, Incorporated, sued Norman Sut-tles, a farmer, for damages for failure to deliver a crop of soybeans. The petition alleged that a contract dated February 2, 1988, obligated Suttles to deliver 10,000 bushels of soybeans for $6.60 per bushel in the last half of October/first half of November, to Cargill’s elevator in Port Allen, Louisiana. The petition alleged that a subsequent agreement extended the

USCA11 Case: 22-13548 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 03/01/2024 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13548 ____________________ MICHAEL DAVID CARRUTH,

ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 45] filed by plaintiffs David A. Bovino P.C. d/b/a Law Officers of Bovino & Associates and David A. Bovino. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1367. I. BACKGROUND1

891 P.2d 57 (1995) CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Appellant (Defendant), v. MOUNTAIN CEMENT COMPANY, Appellee (Plaintiff), and Salt Creek Welding, Appellee (Third-Party Plaintiff). SALT CREEK WELDING, a sole proprietorship, Appellant (Third-Party Plaintiff), v. CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Appellee (Third-Party Defendant). MOUNTAIN CEMENT COMPANY, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. SALT CREEK WELDING; and Cargill Incorporated, Appellees (Def

855 F.Supp. 438 (1994) Frederick ASHMORE, David Boya, William Simone, and Richard Simone, Plaintiffs, v. NORTHEAST PETROLEUM DIVISION OF CARGILL, INC., Northeast Petroleum Corporation of Maine, Northeast Petroleum Corporation of Cape Cod, d/b/a Northeast Petroleum, and Cargill, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 93-199-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. June 21, 1994.

PER CURIAM. This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel; And it appearing that the District Court made careful and detailed findings of fact which are supported by the evidence; And no reversible error appearing in the record: It is ordered that the judgment be an

255 Ga. 616 (1986) 340 S.E.2d 891 CARGILL v. THE STATE. 42698. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided March 18, 1986. Reconsideration Denied April 1, 1986. H. Haywood Turner III, for appellant. William J. Smith, District Attorney, Douglas C. Pullen, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General,

ORDER AND REASONS MENTZ, District Judge. Plaintiff J. Aron & Company brought this suit against American .Commercial Barge Line Company (“ACBL”) for damages due to the alleged deterioration and infestation of four barge loads of com. The barges were delayed on the Mississippi River for several weeks ..when the United States Coast Guard closed the river to .navigation from July 2, 1993 to Oct

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2723-11T1 L.J. ZUCCA, INC., APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Respondent, January 9, 2014 v. APPELLATE DIV

24 Kan. App.2d 896 (1998) 955 P.2d 141 W. J. FITZPATRICK, Conservator for JESSICA BATY, a minor, Appellant, v. SAMANTHA S. ALLEN, Appellee, and MEL-O-DY ICE CREAM, INC., and TINA BATY, Defendants. No. 76,979. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed February 27, 1998. *897 W. J. Fitzpatrick, of

174 F.Supp.2d 678 (2001) INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MIDWEST MAINTENANCE, INC., Defendant. No. C-3-99-351. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 26, 2001. Christopher Mark Bechhold, Thompson, Hine & Flory, Cincinnati, OH, for Indiana Ins. Co. *679 Michael L. Cargill, Dungan, McGr

Lynch, J. This appeal arises in an action by George P. Poly (plaintiff) and Maureen S. Poly (plaintiff’s wife) against the defendants because of their alleged improper handling of a prior action against the United States Air Force (USAF), the plaintiff’s former wife, Janet C. Gillis, and her husband, Air Force Sergeant Earl J. Gillis. On appeal the plaintiff argues that: (1) the trial judge erred in allowing the defendants’ moti

391 F.Supp.2d 872 (2005) Bill MILLENKAMP and Susie Millenkamp, husband and wife, d/b/a Millenkamp Cattle, Plaintiffs, v. DAVISCO FOODS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Minnesota Corporation; and Cargill Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. No. CIV 03-439-S-EJL. United States District Court, D. Idaho. June 20, 2005. *873

OPINION Appellee's motion for rehearing is denied. We withdraw our opinion of April 4, 2008. This is now the opinion of the Court. Indemnity Insurance Company appeals the trial court's order granting the City of Garland's motion for summary judgment and dismissing Indemnity's claims against the City. We reverse the judgment and remand this case to the trial court. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The underlying e

453 B.R. 346 (2011) In re Dale F. SCHMIDT; Terri E. Schmidt, Debtors. Dale F. Schmidt; Schmidt Electric Service, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Klein Bank, Defendant-Appellant. In re Douglas W. Schmidt; Kelly A. Schmidt, Debtors. Douglas W. Schmidt; Schmidt Development Corporation; Schmidt Builders of Buffalo, Inc.; Schmidt Land Co.; David L. Schmidt; F.H. Schmidt, Inc.; Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Klein Bank, Defendant-Appellant.<