Cases

280 F.Supp.2d 578 (2003) Vernell SAGO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:03CV536BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. September 2, 2003. *579 *580 Chokwe Lumumba, Chokwe Lumumba, Attorney, Delano Funches, Funches &

[Cite as State ex rel. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2019-Ohio-2523.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. : Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., : Relator, No. 18AP-195 : v.

835 So.2d 1251 (2003) Ronna MARTINO and Raymond Martino, her husband, Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., an Arkansas corporation, Appellee. No. 4D01-2693. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 29, 2003. *1252 Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., and Steven W. Halvorson

CARAWAY, J. In this case, the local taxing authority seeks to impose a sales and use tax on a “sale of services” as defined in our law involving club membership dues for access *1156to the appellant’s commercial retail outlet store. The trial court held that the dues transaction was taxable under the law. From our statutory interpretation of the sales and use tax provi

Memorandum Opinion and Order JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Wal-Mart’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DN 24] and its First Motion in Limine Concerning Plaintiffs’ Expert, Keith Vidal, P.E. [DN 26]. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, Wal-Mart’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED and Wal-Mart’s motion in limine is GR

STARCHER, Justice, concurring: (Filed Dec. 13, 2001) I concur with the majority’s decision to reverse the judgment below, and to remand this case for a new trial. I write separately to emphasize that when a large corporate defendant such as Wal-Mart, an institution with significant power and financial resources, uses obstructive tactics to make litigation difficult for injured victims

I must respectfully dissent. Unfortunately, the trial court's judgment in this case turns the concept of justice entirely on its head, rewards the unjust, and punishes a legitimate business for attempting to protect itself from theft. I do not see how any business can long survive when it loses its merchandise through shoplifting and then gets punished for seeking to enforce the laws against theft. I hope the kind of "legal" action this plaintiff engaged in is not occurring throughout

650 F.Supp.2d 174 (2009) Jenilu ZBORAY, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant. No. 3:08CV00239 (DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 3, 2009. *175 Frank P. Cannatelli, Cannatelli Law Office, Hamden, CT, for Plaintiff. Pamela J. Moore, Robert J. Gallo, II, McCarter & English, Hartf

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Lois Christian and Amber Edens appeal the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law on their federal and state claims of race discrimination in a retail establishment. Christian, who is black, and Edens, who is white, went to a Wal-Mart on December 15, 1997 to buy Christmas presents. A Wal-M

478 F.Supp.2d 1279 (2007) FIRST STATE BANK, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. d/b/a Daniel, Schell, Wolfe and Associates, P.C., Defendant. No. 05-2505-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 20, 2007. *1280 Amy Loth Allen, Leonard B. Rose, Patrick L. Kenney, Lathrop & Gage, LC, Kansas City, MO, for Plainti

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 831–941 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN STROMBERG; SAMUEL No. 19-15159 ROECKER; THOMAS LAMMEL; MARY GALLOWAY; DANIELLE LAGRAVE; D.C. No. THOMAS MCMAHON; BOARDSPORTS 5:17-md-02773- SCHOOL LLC; PATRICK BENAD; LHK LINDSEY CARR; RENEE ACOSTA; PATRICIA BURNESS; CAROL HARRIS; ROBERT LINKS; NICHELLE LYONS; OPINION NUALA VIGNOLES; RACHEL L. MILLER; JOHN WILLIAM KIEFER III; MATTHEW MITCHELL; SUSAN

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge. Plaintiff Softub, Inc. brought this action against Defendant Mundial, Inc. to recover damages allegedly caused , by Mundial’s sale of defective pumps to Softub for use in portable spa tubs it manufactured. The gravamen of Softub’s complaint is that Mundial marketed and sold to it a product that Mundial knew or should have known was not suit

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PACIRA BIOSCIENCES, INC. and ) PACIRA CRYOTECH, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0694-PAF ) FORTIS ADVISORS LLC, SOLELY ) IN ITS CAPACITY AS ) REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ) FORMER SECURITYHOLDERS

ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In this litigation, Plaintiffs TWTB, Inc. (“TWTB”) and Frank Eugene Raper (“Raper”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) allege that Defendant Bruce Rampiek (“Rampiek”) violated his fiduciary duties as a .director, officer, and shareholder of TWTB,1 LRSBR, LLC (“LRSBR”), which was formed by Rampiek, has filed a third party complain

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the following Motions: 1)Plaintiff Engenium Solutions, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Engenium”) Motion to Strike Defendants’ Expert Andrew Wright (“Motion to Strike Wright”) (Doc. No. 147); 2) Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Expert Dave Faiola (“Motion to

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND TO COMPEL DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiffs OrchestrateHR, Inc. and Viva-ture, Inc. have filed a Motion for Sanctions Against All Defendants [Dkt. No. 232], a Motion for Sanctions Against Anthony L. Trombetta for Spoliation of Evidence [Dkt. No. 240], and an Emergency Motion for Sanctions [Dkt. Nos. 245 &

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON ENTITLEMENT TO CONTINGENCY FEE AWARD Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge *203The Jennis & Bowen law firm agreed to represent the Chapter 7 Trustee on a contingency basis. Before the contingency occurred, the firm's two partners decided to practice separately. So they di

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Overview Today’s appeal centers on a district judge’s decision kicking out this battle-scarred defamation case on summary judgment. By way of introduction, plaintiffs are David Andrew Fink, Pan Am Systems, Inc., and Springfield Terminal Railway Company. Fink is the former President and CEO of Pan Am, the parent corporation of Springfie

JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge: A jury awarded the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC") and Contrice Travis back pay, compensatory damages, and punitive damages after finding that Travis's employer, Exel, Inc., discriminated against her because of her sex. The discrimination occurred when Dave Harris, Travis's supervisor, denied her a promotion in favor of Michael Pooler, a male employee. After the verdict, Exel filed a